Mozilla can't imagine a web without AI.
Uncategorized
22
Posts
8
Posters
4
Views
-
Why would anyone, at this point, use Firefox over Chrome?
Diehards like me are absolutely disgusted with the AI BS Mozilla is pushing down everyone's throats, to just mention one thing. We will find a fork, or eventually hopefully a new independent browser.
Anybody else doesn't give a fsck so why would they use a cheap Chrome knock-off Mozilla made Firefox into, if they can get the real deal for free?
Well done Mozilla. You outplayed yourself.
@rysiek I am using Firefox because ad block is a security feature, and for now we can still disable all AI in Firefox (though it requires checking about 7 different settings stay disabled at every update). I agree this is not sustainable for most people. But for me it's what I prefer to do.
With how much AI has been pushed into Android, how long do you think it will take for it to be pushed into Chrome too? And probably no way to disable.
We really need another browser that respects its users.
-
Why would anyone, at this point, use Firefox over Chrome?
Diehards like me are absolutely disgusted with the AI BS Mozilla is pushing down everyone's throats, to just mention one thing. We will find a fork, or eventually hopefully a new independent browser.
Anybody else doesn't give a fsck so why would they use a cheap Chrome knock-off Mozilla made Firefox into, if they can get the real deal for free?
Well done Mozilla. You outplayed yourself.
Mozilla is the browser vendor equivalent of centrist political parties.
> We can do whatever the fsck we want because who you gonna vote for, the actual far-right?
> Also, we need to try to out-far-right the far-right because that's where the voters are!
And then there's the inevitable surprised pikachu face when people just don't choose them.
Either because they vote for the actual far-right, not the cheap centrist knock-off; or because they refuse to make a choice between shit and crap.
-
@rysiek I am using Firefox because ad block is a security feature, and for now we can still disable all AI in Firefox (though it requires checking about 7 different settings stay disabled at every update). I agree this is not sustainable for most people. But for me it's what I prefer to do.
With how much AI has been pushed into Android, how long do you think it will take for it to be pushed into Chrome too? And probably no way to disable.
We really need another browser that respects its users.
@skylark13 I never said I would switch to Chrome or one of its forks. In fact I said the opposite multiple times. There are Firefox forks, and I intend to explore that space instead.
We really need to *fund* another independent browser. I'd like to see more activity around Verso:
https://gitlab.com/verso-browser/verso -
@skylark13 I never said I would switch to Chrome or one of its forks. In fact I said the opposite multiple times. There are Firefox forks, and I intend to explore that space instead.
We really need to *fund* another independent browser. I'd like to see more activity around Verso:
https://gitlab.com/verso-browser/verso@rysiek Sorry I misinterpreted "why would anyone use Firefox over Chrome" as you saying people should use Chrome. I understand you were more saying people *would* use Chrome. Not necessarily by choice but because there are no good alternatives once you eliminate Firefox.
-
@rysiek Sorry I misinterpreted "why would anyone use Firefox over Chrome" as you saying people should use Chrome. I understand you were more saying people *would* use Chrome. Not necessarily by choice but because there are no good alternatives once you eliminate Firefox.
@skylark13 right. And Firefox is becoming less and less of an actual alternative. By choice, simply because Mozilla insists on chasing Chrome.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
-
Mozilla can't imagine a web without AI.
So I imagine there soon is going to be a web without Mozilla.
@rysiek i can imagine a web without mozilla leadership.
-
@rysiek i can imagine a web without mozilla leadership.
-
@oblomov I read that more as "without the current leadership of the mozilla organization", not as "without mozilla leading"
-
@rysiek and now that you mentioned this other interpretation I feel like it's obviously what @canleaf meant and I have no idea why I interpreted it the other way at first, LOL.
Ironically, if we could get rid of Mozilla leadership (remove from the position of power the people currently leading Mozilla) we might get Mozilla leadership (Mozilla products leading the change in what could be) on the Web again.
-
@rysiek and now that you mentioned this other interpretation I feel like it's obviously what @canleaf meant and I have no idea why I interpreted it the other way at first, LOL.
Ironically, if we could get rid of Mozilla leadership (remove from the position of power the people currently leading Mozilla) we might get Mozilla leadership (Mozilla products leading the change in what could be) on the Web again.
-
undefined mora@mastodon.uno shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
eh, ma lo sai che nonostante io lo abbia sofferto come "punizione", oggi, col senno di poi, posso dire che era una materia davvero pregevole?
A prescindere dai lavori manuali, in economia domestica di 50 anni fa, c'era una parte dedicata alla pianificazione e all'organizzazione che mi sono ritrovata a studiare negli anni da project manager!
Questo per avvalorare anche la questione che anche dalle cose che non ci piace fare si impara sempre tanto.
-
@jonikorpi @lritter none of the interactive objects in my house have dynamic lighting
-
-
@aeva @lritter Here's a fun one: was the “interactable things are unlit" thing in early 3D games diegetic or non-diegetic?
-
@lritter @jonikorpi ah, right, like dk bananaza
-
-
@bradipo là dove la pratica "privata" porta guadagni enormi, l'affezione per la maglia della nazionale è proporzionalmente più debole.
-
@aeva @jonikorpi in the ideal game, the answer to the question "which elements in my environment can i interact with?" is "yes"
