this is *exactly* my point,

[luca@sironi.xyz]

RE: https://connectedplaces.online/reports/fr150-on-ice-verification-and-presence-as-harm/

this is *exactly* my point,

"When fediverse users say they don’t want to be bridged to Bluesky, they’re applying an ActivityPub mental model to ATProto infrastructure. In one sense this is a bit of a category error, the bridge connects to networking infrastructure, not the application. This way you’re not just refusing to federate with the Bluesky-the-app but with the entire ecosystem, including apps with different values, such as Blacksky or Leaflet."

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@luca this also shows a significant issue with the AT proto model, that makes it impossible to only federate with the part you want.

[luca@sironi.xyz]

@oblomov

No, it's just that we are putting a square plug in a round hole.

That account was created for trolling on the still big 99% instance.
Will it ever decrease to blacksky/northsky/ w (lol) ? We don't know.

Let's say that it enables the bridge, then you can user block it.
There is no way it can harm you.
I think one of the last bridgyfed feature is that you can even subscribe to public block list.

Do I think an irregular immigrant should be on the ATproto network or linkedin or amazon ?
hell, no.

I shouldn't physically go to US as well, if they are gonna search on the internet for my comments on their administration and politics

[luca@sironi.xyz]

@oblomov comunque l'altro giorno ero a cena con alcuni amici e se dovessi tenere lo standard che tengo sui social li avrei dovuti bloccare tutti🙂

[gioseve20@mastodon.social]

@luca @oblomov
Come ti capisco, però devo dire che negli ultimi 2/3 anni ho fatto una bella pulizia, parlo della vita reale.

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@Gioseve20 @luca LI HAI SCIOLTI NELL'ACIDO?