Sam Bankman-Fried has just filed a pro se motion for a new trial, via his mother

[molly0xfff@hachyderm.io]

Sam Bankman-Fried has just filed a pro se motion for a new trial, via his mother

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66631292/583/united-states-v-bankman-fried/

#crypto #SBF

[riley@toot.cat]

@molly0xfff That's a good sign. Means that he can't afford to buy a pardon.

[glyph@mastodon.social]

@molly0xfff is this going to be as amazing as it sounds or is the court just going to say “no”

[badsamurai@infosec.exchange]

@molly0xfff

Stanford Law School @ Gmail.. Like lifting the hood to a mustang and seeing a 4 cylinder.

[ryan@m29.us]

@molly0xfff Reading the Chapsky declaration, what is the '"special features" that were added to the Alameda "info@" account on FTX'? Google is being useless and I'm imagining some sort of backchannel email-based bot.

[joshg@mathstodon.xyz]

@molly0xfff
his mother is a law professor at Stanford

his mother

is a law professor
at

... god why is this timeline so fucking ridiculous

[molly0xfff@hachyderm.io]

His motion mainly argues that two former FTX employees who didn't testify (Daniel Chapsky and Ryan Salame) would have undercut prosecutors' narrative, but were threatened out of testifying. He also claims Nishad Singh was coerced by prosecutors into changing his testimony.

It also repeats his longstanding argument that the funds were never missing and that FTX was never insolvent. (Judge Kaplan got a bit sick of this argument during trial, pointing out that repayment doesn't negate fraud).

#crypto #SBF