Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

#WritersCoffeeClub (Sep) 1: Intro: Shameless Self Promotion.

Uncategorized
885 1 4.7k

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    17 Views
    #WritersCoffeeClub Dec 26 Who or what serves as your "rubber duck"?Friends. I get all my best flashes of insight when telling friends about my current work in progress over a coffee or a beer.(I suspect the act of explaining forces me to linearize my chain of reasoning, which exposes weak links: and the audience asks questions or cues me by indicating what they're paying attention to, which uncovers other stuff.)NB: I have the ASD thing of missing conversational pass-the-parcel cues.
  • #WritersCoffeeClub Nov 12th.

    Uncategorized writerscoffeeclub
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    28 Views
    @SteveClough @cstross I write nothing more creative than documentation for the software I produce, but people misunderstand that, too.The experience of people misunderstanding my docs, or simply failing to read them, was one of the things that turned me away from evangelicalism. (I bet you didn't see that coming.) I wasn't using parables to hint at ineffable spiritual truths in the face of religious persecution: I was just explaining how software worked, how to see its current state, and how to configure and maintain systems. People who were paid to read and understand this material would not or could not do so: their repeated questions made it obvious. Within a very few years, instead of reading TFM, people developed folk stories of commands they could type that usually did something that could be mistaken for success. They veered constantly off-course, and I kept having to drag them back. They consulted each other, rather than the docs, and developed their own mythology about how the software worked. They intuitively felt they knew the software better than I did, because my approach to problem-solving was careful and methodical but they knew a golden shortcut.If concrete, human-level explanations, written out literally, landed so badly, there's no chance that people will have remembered the figurative and unfathomable teachings of Jesus seventy years after his death, written them down accurately and fully, and built from them a useful picture of worlds seen and unseen and the will of God. I'm sorry; it just doesn't ring true.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    20 Views
    #WritersCoffeeClub Oct 20 - What role does death (or undeath!) play in your work?I write genre fiction and it is *surprisingly hard* to write a novel in which nobody dies; death tends to be trivialized or used to advance the plot and seldom traumatizes the survivors.To which I say, to hell with that!(Current WIP massacres with gleeful abandon, but it's SF set in a future with lossy mind uploading and replay, so they've effectively got mechanised reincarnation. Societal whackiness ensues.)
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    15 Views
    Interesting question from: #WritersCoffeeClub day 17: Should modern writers worry about proving their work is not generated by an LLM?My answer: Only if their writing is vacuous. As @kagan writes, the "tells" of AI "writing" are a moving target, but vacuity is still a strong indicator that something is probably written by AI, and if not, that it's almost certainly slop and not worth your time regardless. Just don't write slop, or if you do, don't publish it.