#WritersCoffeeClub Motivation
Uncategorized
1
Posts
1
Posters
15
Views
-
#WritersCoffeeClub Motivation
This question has come at a good time because a lovely writer friend of mine is struggling to get back into writing after a long absence and mental health problems are heightening the issue.
I’ve given them suggestions to rekindle their writing practice. But if you have any suggestions, please share them.
-
undefined filobus@sociale.network shared this topic on
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@gargron@mastodon.social that actually makes a lot of sense. I don't want to subscribe to the idea that you're on your way to the third E (😝)... that you're simply trying to stay in your lane is the simplest most logical explanation.
-
@hiker @Mastodon @fediversereport Probably the body best suited to publish something like a fediverse share tool is the @swf. Regardless, I think we're well within our rights to publish a tool our users asked for, catered to our own platform. Not everything has to be for everyone. PeerTube has a PeerTube app and Sepia Search, nobody is upset (nor should they be) that those don't work with Mastodon.
-
@cwebber Not only do I hear stuff like this from regular brogrammers, I've even heard it from people I've traditionally admired a great deal for being (to date) serious developers and stewards of platforms & APIs.
I. Don't. Get. It. At. All.
Please make it make sense!! (I know, it doesn't… 😭)
-
@tassoman non c'era modo di spegnerlo senza poter vedere lo schermo, e lo schermo era morto
-
@cwebber LLM-boosting colleagues keep making this assertion and then retracting it after they see my facial expression
-
@hiker @Mastodon @fediversereport My impression is that a lot of people would be upset with us if we published something claiming to be a "fediverse" tool, as if we own the fediverse. Of course, there's also not nearly the same amount of brand recognition for the fediverse as a concept. There are at least 3 unofficial symbol proposals and most people outside the fediverse aren't familiar with any of them.
-
@cwebber in the context of rewriting code, though, I think they should be treated like a "translation" tool (like compilers and linkers) and should not be able to change the copyright of the original (other than adding more ambiguity, I suppose).
-
@cwebber exactly this. on the flip side, their seemed to be a vast desire among management types and maybe hobbyists for some super easy super high level language. but idk if it's even worth going there. avoiding the details only works until it doesn't
