I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit.
Uncategorized
37
Posts
12
Posters
155
Views
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
@astronomerritt it varies. I do both.
-
@astronomerritt it varies. I do both.
@astronomerritt my first drafts are usually pretty clean, but also there are stories I have been writing and rewriting for decades.
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
@astronomerritt depends on the draft and the scene content. I often focus on the dialogue and fill in the scene after.
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
@astronomerritt my partner tends to add words when editing (depending on the type of edit he's doing). Often he wants to keep the book under a word goal, and will purposefully edit with the secondary goal of removing words
-
@astronomerritt my first drafts are usually pretty clean, but also there are stories I have been writing and rewriting for decades.
@Rhube Same on both "clean first draft" and "writing and rewriting for decades". For the latter I tend to start over from scratch every single time because my vision for the story has changed. Exhausting. I should stop.
It's actually nice to hear from someone else who writes pretty clean first drafts. I know that common writing advice is to let your first draft be absolute hot garbage, and I've tried going in with that mindset, but I find that I just don't enjoy writing that way. I LIKE sitting there for a bit fiddling with a paragraph until it doesn't suck.
-
@astronomerritt depends on the draft and the scene content. I often focus on the dialogue and fill in the scene after.
@Emmacox Yeah, I've done that. And sometimes I don't explicitly set out to do that, but then I'll go in for the second draft and realise a scene has absolutely no sense of physical place past the introductory paragraph. Oops.
-
@astronomerritt my partner tends to add words when editing (depending on the type of edit he's doing). Often he wants to keep the book under a word goal, and will purposefully edit with the secondary goal of removing words
@Artemis201 Interesting! Is your partner a fiction writer or non-fiction? I'm wondering if it's different.
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
@astronomerritt Yeah I think I tend to do this. (But I also sometimes remove words or replace words where I feel it's needed.)
-
@astronomerritt Yeah I think I tend to do this. (But I also sometimes remove words or replace words where I feel it's needed.)
@Aaron_Davis Oh yeah, for sure I still remove words, I have a horrible tendency to use weasel words in a first draft and I have to cut ALL of them in the second. But on the whole, the second draft will have a longer word count.
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
My professional writing is for academic purposes, but yes, my first drafts tend to be terse, and readers complain that they need more context/explanation/expansion.
(My superpower is that when everyone else is done writing a grant proposal and it's 30% over the length limit, I come in and condense it until it fits.)
-
@Rhube Same on both "clean first draft" and "writing and rewriting for decades". For the latter I tend to start over from scratch every single time because my vision for the story has changed. Exhausting. I should stop.
It's actually nice to hear from someone else who writes pretty clean first drafts. I know that common writing advice is to let your first draft be absolute hot garbage, and I've tried going in with that mindset, but I find that I just don't enjoy writing that way. I LIKE sitting there for a bit fiddling with a paragraph until it doesn't suck.
@astronomerritt I rarely rewrite entirely from the beginning, tho I have on occassion.
A lot of writing advice is just what works for one person that they're convinced will work for everyone else.
Editing garbage is much more painful to me than getting something down in the first place, so I prefer to not write garbage 😅 but also I have been a proofreader & editor for 15~ years and in and out of half a dozen writing groups. My first drafts weren't always clean; I've just had a lot of practice.
-
@Artemis201 Interesting! Is your partner a fiction writer or non-fiction? I'm wondering if it's different.
@astronomerritt fiction.
And when I say "tends to", I mean if he's not paying attention to word count, his word count often balloons. So he tries to be rigorous about keeping under the limit he sets himself (120k), which often means purposefully removing words during edits (unless it's an edit where he realizes that the story needs a while extra scene to make things make sense) -
My professional writing is for academic purposes, but yes, my first drafts tend to be terse, and readers complain that they need more context/explanation/expansion.
(My superpower is that when everyone else is done writing a grant proposal and it's 30% over the length limit, I come in and condense it until it fits.)
@stevegis_ssg Ooh, now this is interesting to me, because I tended to overwrite in my professional, academic writing! You have a true superpower there, honestly, anyone who can condense a proposal down like that is a genius and a saint.
-
@astronomerritt I rarely rewrite entirely from the beginning, tho I have on occassion.
A lot of writing advice is just what works for one person that they're convinced will work for everyone else.
Editing garbage is much more painful to me than getting something down in the first place, so I prefer to not write garbage 😅 but also I have been a proofreader & editor for 15~ years and in and out of half a dozen writing groups. My first drafts weren't always clean; I've just had a lot of practice.
@Rhube Yes, exactly!! I was trying to think through why my first drafts are so clean and I think you've nailed it. I do not want to edit garbage. Also, I've been writing since I learned how and seriously studying writing and narratives since I was a teenager, so I suppose that's rubbed off on me too. But absolutely the thought of editing my own garbage gives me hives.
-
@astronomerritt fiction.
And when I say "tends to", I mean if he's not paying attention to word count, his word count often balloons. So he tries to be rigorous about keeping under the limit he sets himself (120k), which often means purposefully removing words during edits (unless it's an edit where he realizes that the story needs a while extra scene to make things make sense)@Artemis201 Ah, that's very interesting! I don't pay attention to word count at all, really, but I can definitely see how that would be a useful thing to do.
-
I feel like most writers I know end up cutting words from the draft when they edit. Do any writers reading this find that they tend to add words instead?
My first drafts are often pretty sparse. When I'm editing, I work out where I need to slow down a bit, set a scene, let the story breathe, give the reader a little bit more information.
As a person, I am... loquacious, let's say, but apparently this doesn't translate to my writing.
I do. A rough chapter may start at 700 words and take several fluffings to get to 2,000 words.
-
I do. A rough chapter may start at 700 words and take several fluffings to get to 2,000 words.
@UncoveredMyths Fluffings! :D
You're even more sparse than I am! I'd say a normal chapter word-length increase for me would be anything from a sixth to a third. That's really interesting. What do you tend to leave out in the first draft that you add in the second?
-
@UncoveredMyths Fluffings! :D
You're even more sparse than I am! I'd say a normal chapter word-length increase for me would be anything from a sixth to a third. That's really interesting. What do you tend to leave out in the first draft that you add in the second?
It varies. Apparently a lot though. I always make a senses pass as well.
-
It varies. Apparently a lot though. I always make a senses pass as well.
@UncoveredMyths Can I ask what you mean by a senses pass? I think I know, and do something similar, but I'd like to know your definition.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@gargron@mastodon.social that actually makes a lot of sense. I don't want to subscribe to the idea that you're on your way to the third E (😝)... that you're simply trying to stay in your lane is the simplest most logical explanation.
-
@hiker @Mastodon @fediversereport Probably the body best suited to publish something like a fediverse share tool is the @swf. Regardless, I think we're well within our rights to publish a tool our users asked for, catered to our own platform. Not everything has to be for everyone. PeerTube has a PeerTube app and Sepia Search, nobody is upset (nor should they be) that those don't work with Mastodon.
-
@cwebber Not only do I hear stuff like this from regular brogrammers, I've even heard it from people I've traditionally admired a great deal for being (to date) serious developers and stewards of platforms & APIs.
I. Don't. Get. It. At. All.
Please make it make sense!! (I know, it doesn't… 😭)
-
@tassoman non c'era modo di spegnerlo senza poter vedere lo schermo, e lo schermo era morto
-
@cwebber LLM-boosting colleagues keep making this assertion and then retracting it after they see my facial expression
-
@hiker @Mastodon @fediversereport My impression is that a lot of people would be upset with us if we published something claiming to be a "fediverse" tool, as if we own the fediverse. Of course, there's also not nearly the same amount of brand recognition for the fediverse as a concept. There are at least 3 unofficial symbol proposals and most people outside the fediverse aren't familiar with any of them.
-
@cwebber in the context of rewriting code, though, I think they should be treated like a "translation" tool (like compilers and linkers) and should not be able to change the copyright of the original (other than adding more ambiguity, I suppose).
-
@cwebber exactly this. on the flip side, their seemed to be a vast desire among management types and maybe hobbyists for some super easy super high level language. but idk if it's even worth going there. avoiding the details only works until it doesn't
