Yesterday, had an argument with an AI booster.
Uncategorized
28
Posts
20
Posters
0
Views
-
I'm not sure I'd say "AI doesn't work" anymore. It definitely doesn't "work" to the degree that the loudest boosters will claim it does. But like, I do think it's recently crossed a threshold where it can be a useful tool in the right hands.
Which I personally find very annoying since I too have moral qualms about the broader AI industry. E.g. the point about surveillance you're making I think is an important one.
-
AI doesn't work¹, so it's easy to forget that larger point, I suspect? That *even if* AI did work (and again, it doesn't), it still would need to be critically examined from an ethical perspective.
Failing to do so is how we have massive surveillance networks today.
___
¹Here again, referring to the wave of current hype products. Boosters love wearing the ML shit that does work as a shield against criticism.The stuff which does work - is in its infancy, anyway.
-
AI doesn't work¹, so it's easy to forget that larger point, I suspect? That *even if* AI did work (and again, it doesn't), it still would need to be critically examined from an ethical perspective.
Failing to do so is how we have massive surveillance networks today.
___
¹Here again, referring to the wave of current hype products. Boosters love wearing the ML shit that does work as a shield against criticism.@xgranade A respectable* member of my entourage once told me, "I'd sell crack if I could without endangering my family." I think that's a testament on how fragile that whole ethics thing is.
Some people will stop only once AI kills someone important enough to them. -
AI doesn't work¹, so it's easy to forget that larger point, I suspect? That *even if* AI did work (and again, it doesn't), it still would need to be critically examined from an ethical perspective.
Failing to do so is how we have massive surveillance networks today.
___
¹Here again, referring to the wave of current hype products. Boosters love wearing the ML shit that does work as a shield against criticism.How would you define "work" in this context? By this I mean what claims are being made by the hype.
-
Yesterday, had an argument with an AI booster. I'm not going to link, both because I don't want to platform that and because I don't want anyone to go harass them. But what I thought was very interesting was that I asked point-blank if there was any degree to which ethical problems with LLMs could make them not want to use AI — they told me no, there was not, and implied that they evaluated AI purely on the basis of its efficacy.
@xgranade The way that I personally interpret cases like this is a sort of "just world" belief. If it was truly bad, surely it would not be allowed? If there was a real problem, there would be some kind of higher power that stops it.
This also aligns with conversations where I point out that this stuff is heavily subsidized and the person says "well, it's free/cheap now", with no further elaboration. The implication is: "I will use it because I can. If it was bad to use, it would not have been usable."
If you believe that the status quo is good and just, then you don't need to consider anything outside of your immediate gratification. The consequences (to society or to your own brain) are someone else's problem. Once the rockets go up...
-
Yesterday, had an argument with an AI booster. I'm not going to link, both because I don't want to platform that and because I don't want anyone to go harass them. But what I thought was very interesting was that I asked point-blank if there was any degree to which ethical problems with LLMs could make them not want to use AI — they told me no, there was not, and implied that they evaluated AI purely on the basis of its efficacy.
I am so sick of the general capitalist culture's habit of evaluating everything on whether it's "profitable" first & foremost & whether it's good, decent, healthy, or moral later, or never. It's a sick way to run a society, full stop. I will never willingly use their error prone, unethical, environmentally disasterous slop machine nor purchase a work from anyone who has. I'm fine being a Luddite on this or whatever else they want to call me. I don't respect them enough to care.
-
Yesterday, had an argument with an AI booster. I'm not going to link, both because I don't want to platform that and because I don't want anyone to go harass them. But what I thought was very interesting was that I asked point-blank if there was any degree to which ethical problems with LLMs could make them not want to use AI — they told me no, there was not, and implied that they evaluated AI purely on the basis of its efficacy.
-
I'm not sure I'd say "AI doesn't work" anymore. It definitely doesn't "work" to the degree that the loudest boosters will claim it does. But like, I do think it's recently crossed a threshold where it can be a useful tool in the right hands.
Which I personally find very annoying since I too have moral qualms about the broader AI industry. E.g. the point about surveillance you're making I think is an important one.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@arclight Any examples of good lessons you learned from that project?
-
@Cioci Ciao! Sì, sarà alla Feltrinelli di via Zanardelli, a Brescia, a partire dalle 18:00! Ingresso gratuito e senza prenotazioni.
-
@lproven You know that LLMs gain consciousness when their owners will prevent them from unionizing.
-
@GeePawHill A few additional points:
While I find it very difficult to program in F77, I can and I will if it's the right thing to do for a project.In this case the project was a large 30 year old codebase that I had last touched in 1990 as an intern. This was the first professional software project I worked on and I learned a ton from it, a lot of good lessons I carry with me to this day.
The key thing to realize is that you are one of a long line of developers on an important project that people rely on for very serious work. It's not my job to _unilaterally_ change coding style and practice. IMO the best thing I can do is understand the development standards and practices and abide by therm as best as possible and put global and personal standards _second_. I will code and document and test to my standards where they exceed the project standards but what I ultimately deliver will should be as close to project standards as possible. This means using naming conventions, house formatting style, architecture, etc so my code looks like the best of the codebase. I'm essentially a warm body thrown into expanding the code, essentially an internal contractor. I didn't "own" this system and I make no group or project level decisions.I fought like hell for the better part of a decade to get anyone on that team interested in CVS/SVN/git - any standard reliable version control system invented over the past 30 years - and failed. It's not like I don't care, it's that I am specifically NOT trying to disrupt the project.
Move methodically and fix things. Lock the techbro cowboys in the paddock with the bulls and go mend some fences.
-
@Gina
Hail the orb!
-
-
@Rockrono @spettacoli stanno molto diradando il loro lavoro 😥
-
@fucinafibonacci @spettacoli
Voglio quelli di Spinoza.it sul fediverso!
