Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
I suppose, although in that scenario theoretically one could add as:sensitive to mark the status as CW'd? I don't think CW logic is even run for non-Notes at the moment, though I could be mistaken.
-
Marcia PerugiAssisi “Imagine all the people” https://www.legambiente.it/news-storie/marcia-perugiassisi-imagine-all-the-people/ #CittadinanzaAttiva #News&Storie
-
So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW’d by Mastodon currently.
I know, I was just saying that it prevents a non-Note from being CW'd, as the summery is used as the post's content.
-
Not necessarily, no. Content warnings were implemented in Mastodon specifically as summary plus sensitive=true. Perhaps not originally, but that is enforced now (all CW'd posts from Mastodon are marked sensitive). Might be Mastodon will CW notes that don't have sensitive, out of caution, but this doesn't apply to non-Notes.
So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW'd by Mastodon currently.
-
If it has a summary, I will use that as the content
But isn't that how Mastodon handles content warnings? Baffling that they'd do it like that frankly given that it prevents long-form content (when masto actually starts supporting that) from being CW'd.
-
Thanks. Yes, this is just how Mastodon renders content from Lemmy and Piefed at the moment.
Mastodon sees something that is not a Note, and says "I will treat it using a fallback mechanism. If it has a title, it is added to the top, I will add the URL back to the site at the bottom. If it has a summary, I will use that as the content"
Note that it does not use content, that's why there's no actual content. This is why the link preview also links back to Lemmy, not to the article itself.
nutomic@lemmy.ml and rimu@piefed.social can add this to their software, respectively, by populating summary. It can just be a copy of content, or it can be a summarization... or it could be the link to the article... anything goes really.
-
We at the Center for Digital Rights and Democracy (Zentrum für Digitalrechte und Demokratie) are proposing a concept to fund the #Fediverse with tax money!
The German federal government should set up a funding program with a fixed budget of 20.000.000€ and clear responsibilities.
This should be implemented in the budget for 2026, because time is running fast.Seize the opportunity now!
Spread our plan! #foefed_digitalrechte
-
How they see it: https://sfba.social/@otters_raft@lemmy.ca/115267196743748430
Do note that Mastodon forces a redirect to the original instance for non-local posts, here's a direct link to the comment: https://sfba.social/@karlauerbach/115267230182946226
It seems that threadiverse posts are being seen by more mastodon users now, which is great, but maybe the formatting could use some improvements?
There's actually some related (yet-to-be-merged) changes to this on the Mastodon side, add support for links in Attachments (this is how Lemmy and the like federate links).
I don't think anything's changed, just two users finding a post in a hashtag (Lemmy adds the community name as a hastag for posts). I've seen some masto users complain about this in the past on the #lemmy tag.
