Par🇮🇹le n°1416 6/6#parle
Uncategorized
1
Posts
1
Posters
0
Views
-
Par🇮🇹le n°1416 6/6
#parle🟨⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩
⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩
⬛⬛🟩⬛🟩
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@TomAoki Yes, probably. I haven't investigated deeply, but seeing the http result, I think it's related to the aes-ni.
-
-
@cryptomator @cyberduck
Squircle Rejection Society?
-
@cienmilojos thank you!
-
ALZATI, Ursula! Combatti per l'Europa, non per Trump e le grandi aziende tecnologiche
Aggiungi il tuo nome ora: chiedi all'UE di opporsi a Trump e alle grandi aziende tecnologiche, iniziando dallo smantellamento di Google.
-
AFAIK this is the first known case of "celebrity scientist" making profit of scientific popularization, which can be a counterproductive #scicomm strategy where the risk is to polarize the content of the scientists around the paying audience, confirming the prejudices and biases of anti-vaxxers regarding the alleged economic interests that drive virologists to promote vaccines, casting the entire scientific community under the shadow of a single and questionable online business initiative.
-
@stefano
Interesting writing as usual, and interesting result!
Maybe supporting aesni or not, or how offloading to NIC matters here on TLS tests?
-
2) But no context and no scientific information is provided directly by Burioni: following the link to his personal website within the tweet, the scienific knowledge is HIDDEN BEHIND A PAYWALL.
My fear is that the alarm generated by the legal news without scientific published on the Twitter account of Burioni with 342K followers could have been greater than the reassurance provided to the ones willing to pay for it, which presumably already agree with Burioni.
See https://burioni.substack.com/p/il-vaccino-a-mrna-contro-il-covid
