Apple displays finally move beyond 60Hz, but only if you have an M4 Mac or newer.
-
Apple displays finally move beyond 60Hz, but only if you have an M4 Mac or newer.
I'm powering a 160Hz 4K display with a GPU from 2019. đ
-
Apple displays finally move beyond 60Hz, but only if you have an M4 Mac or newer.
I'm powering a 160Hz 4K display with a GPU from 2019. đ
@thomholwerda I still just want a 32" 6K LCD non-HDR plain 60Hz screen. Display color/quality and refresh rae became more than good enough a decade ago, I just want more screen real estate (at HiDPI).
-
Apple displays finally move beyond 60Hz, but only if you have an M4 Mac or newer.
I'm powering a 160Hz 4K display with a GPU from 2019. đ
@thomholwerda my "old" MacBook Pro M1 Pro is driving a Dell monitor - 4K at 120Hz. The only thing is: you need to plug it using the display port via thunderbolt, as hdmi will limit it to 60hz.
Apple displays are too expensive, for me, and I don't need them.
-
@thomholwerda my "old" MacBook Pro M1 Pro is driving a Dell monitor - 4K at 120Hz. The only thing is: you need to plug it using the display port via thunderbolt, as hdmi will limit it to 60hz.
Apple displays are too expensive, for me, and I don't need them.
@stefano @thomholwerda In fairness, these are 5K displays, so have about 77% more pixels than 4K ones. So the additional bandwidth required is nontrivial, and there arenât a lot of 5K+ ~120Hz displays on the market. As far as I'm aware the others don't use a USB-C port for those data rates. (Of course, Mini-DP ports are no longer fashionable in Cupertino; and I fully agree the displays are overpriced for most users, video professionals may disagree however.)