@nazokiyoubinbou @Viss Exactly
Uncategorized
1.4k
Posts
383
Posters
0
Views
-
@Viss my old neighbor had a bluetooth soundbar in his man cave that i could connect to because it was open auth, so i used to drop in and blast “Hello” by Adele every so often.
-
@Viss who remembers upsidedownternet
-
@Viss my old neighbor had a bluetooth soundbar in his man cave that i could connect to because it was open auth, so i used to drop in and blast “Hello” by Adele every so often.
@SecureOwl heh, yeah in this case it wont pair but it stops whatever im watching, which is annoying
-
@Viss I mean aren’t you curious though? What exactly are they watching? Perhaps they want to simply share it with you ;)
-
@Viss I mean aren’t you curious though? What exactly are they watching? Perhaps they want to simply share it with you ;)
@k3ym0 yeah thats the opposite of whats happening. if they control my chromecast they control what i watch
-
@Viss my old neighbor had a bluetooth soundbar in his man cave that i could connect to because it was open auth, so i used to drop in and blast “Hello” by Adele every so often.
@SecureOwl @Viss
THAT WAS YOU?! -
@k3ym0 yeah thats the opposite of whats happening. if they control my chromecast they control what i watch
-
@Viss I identify with this but my brain instructs me to complete a task unrelated to the deadline
-
@Viss s/handling of the touchpad //
FTFY
-
@Viss It’s the modern equivalent of “Hey Peter, man, check out channel 9! Check out this chick!”
-
@Viss @zarchasmpgmr At this point all stocks are meme stocks. There's no rational decision making being made.
-
@Viss I guess an alternate reading of the data is it only takes 3% to make a space extremely toxic :/
@aburka @Viss This is kind of a well-known thing among experienced community moderators already, though - it's always just a handful of people inciting shit and riling up everyone else. Even in the context of school bullying, it's the same thing - a few bullies and a pile of bystanders.
Where it often goes wrong in practice is that people are afraid to moderate decisively against such people because those people tend to be very good at walking lines, and with a prevailing ideology of "you can't ban someone unless they are clearly breaking a defined rule".... well, you can see where this is going.
Pretty much the only working defense against this sort of toxicity is moderating subjectively for community health rather than legalistically, and just not enough places are willing to do that today. -
@aburka @Viss This is kind of a well-known thing among experienced community moderators already, though - it's always just a handful of people inciting shit and riling up everyone else. Even in the context of school bullying, it's the same thing - a few bullies and a pile of bystanders.
Where it often goes wrong in practice is that people are afraid to moderate decisively against such people because those people tend to be very good at walking lines, and with a prevailing ideology of "you can't ban someone unless they are clearly breaking a defined rule".... well, you can see where this is going.
Pretty much the only working defense against this sort of toxicity is moderating subjectively for community health rather than legalistically, and just not enough places are willing to do that today. -
-
@aburka @Viss This is kind of a well-known thing among experienced community moderators already, though - it's always just a handful of people inciting shit and riling up everyone else. Even in the context of school bullying, it's the same thing - a few bullies and a pile of bystanders.
Where it often goes wrong in practice is that people are afraid to moderate decisively against such people because those people tend to be very good at walking lines, and with a prevailing ideology of "you can't ban someone unless they are clearly breaking a defined rule".... well, you can see where this is going.
Pretty much the only working defense against this sort of toxicity is moderating subjectively for community health rather than legalistically, and just not enough places are willing to do that today.@etherdiver this sounds very familiar, eh?
-
@ifixcoinops @joepie91 @aburka @Viss RPS policy was, I paraphrase, no warnings just ban them. checking comments and banning dickheads is a valid worktime activity
The one time I went against my better judgement and warned someone (they were making a valid criticism of the site, but channelling it into an attack on one young writer with obviously zero influence over management decisions), they kept up with the shit so it was just a waste of energy and I had to ban them anyway
-
@ifixcoinops @joepie91 @aburka @Viss RPS policy was, I paraphrase, no warnings just ban them. checking comments and banning dickheads is a valid worktime activity
The one time I went against my better judgement and warned someone (they were making a valid criticism of the site, but channelling it into an attack on one young writer with obviously zero influence over management decisions), they kept up with the shit so it was just a waste of energy and I had to ban them anyway
@ifixcoinops @joepie91 @aburka @Viss also when I banned someone on another writer's article cos they were giving me the "nah this one's trying to start shit" feeling, that writer had a go at me for overdoing it. And now that commenter was kicking off ranting about how they were banned for nothing and we were awful and etc etc
So like... I was fuckin right and I'd do it again
-
@ifixcoinops @joepie91 @sinvega @aburka @Viss
So much this.
I have a group of real life in-person friends. We don't have a written set of bylaws or code of conduct, and if/when someone gets obnoxious, they stop getting invited. Why would my online friend group be different? "Be cool and nice, don't cause problems" shouldn't need to be explicit.
-
@ifixcoinops @joepie91 @aburka @Viss RPS policy was, I paraphrase, no warnings just ban them. checking comments and banning dickheads is a valid worktime activity
The one time I went against my better judgement and warned someone (they were making a valid criticism of the site, but channelling it into an attack on one young writer with obviously zero influence over management decisions), they kept up with the shit so it was just a waste of energy and I had to ban them anyway
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@valigiablu @radiopopolare @arianna Siamo in tanti a pensarla così, Arianna! Certo non avevo grandi aspettative da questo governo, ma almeno difendere l'interesse nazionale.. 🙄
-
Ask him about good things instead. Even if he never said them! Push him in the other direction.
-
@G3rt sha256sum prima :) un vecchio Lenovo anche tu?
-
"Mr. President, I don't think you're *smart* enough to invade Panama. I double-dog dare you! You don't have the guts! Last one to invade Panama is a low-down skunk!"
-
Especially don't ask in a way that makes it sound like he's DUMB or BAD AT HIS JOB if he doesn't do the thing. We all know that he is dumb and bad at his job! We do not need piece of evidence no. 3,564,189 to be entered into the public record!
-
-
Look, I know that this is part of what you learn at journalism school.
"Mr. Politician, you said you were going to do X and you haven't done it yet. Can you comment?"
"Mr. Politician, what did you mean when you said you'd do X?"
I can tell you definitively on behalf of the general public, we do not need those answers from Donald Trump, thank you very much! It's perfectly OK not to ask those questions and remind him of some terrible thing he said he'd do.
-
@Otttoz il Giorno della Dimenticanza.
