Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
Vai ser meu navegador principal no PC
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox It depends on what LLM's are used when it comes to AI. I'd say Qwen and maybe DeepSeek when locally downloaded on one's own might be a good option.
I wouldn't take any other countries other than the open-source Chinese LLM's (especially Qwen), considering that most of them hallucinate purposely.
There's a study called "ChatGPT is bullshit", which is here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5
-
@Waterfox OK, I spent some time in Waterfox and Mozilla documentation and didn't find an answer: does Waterfox support the "file" URI scheme (as specified in RFC8089 and its predecessors)? If there is a setting to enable it I didn't find it, but if it has been removed I didn't find a statement to that effect either. (It didn't seem to be enabled by default, I just got an error).
-
@Waterfox OK, I spent some time in Waterfox and Mozilla documentation and didn't find an answer: does Waterfox support the "file" URI scheme (as specified in RFC8089 and its predecessors)? If there is a setting to enable it I didn't find it, but if it has been removed I didn't find a statement to that effect either. (It didn't seem to be enabled by default, I just got an error).
@soaproot yes it does - what platform and any specific error?
-
@Waterfox Platform is Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS. Waterfox was... installed from the Pop!_Shop maybe? Let me try uninstalling and reinstalling before I take more of your time. Just knowing file URLs are supposed to work is quite helpful.
-
@Waterfox Platform is Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS. Waterfox was... installed from the Pop!_Shop maybe? Let me try uninstalling and reinstalling before I take more of your time. Just knowing file URLs are supposed to work is quite helpful.
@Waterfox OK, I uninstalled in Pop!_Shop and reinstalled using "flatpak install flathub net.waterfox.waterfox" as suggested at https://www.waterfox.com/support/install-waterfox-linux/ . Now if I navigate to file:///home/jkingdon/work/set.mm/mmil.html (a URL which works in firefox) the error is "
File not foundWaterfox canโt find the file at /home/jkingdon/work/set.mm/mmil.html."
-
@Waterfox OK, I uninstalled in Pop!_Shop and reinstalled using "flatpak install flathub net.waterfox.waterfox" as suggested at https://www.waterfox.com/support/install-waterfox-linux/ . Now if I navigate to file:///home/jkingdon/work/set.mm/mmil.html (a URL which works in firefox) the error is "
File not foundWaterfox canโt find the file at /home/jkingdon/work/set.mm/mmil.html."
@soaproot hmm, Iโve only tested on macOS and windows! Will try Linux tomorrow and let you know if I can see whatโs going on
-
@Waterfox OK, I uninstalled in Pop!_Shop and reinstalled using "flatpak install flathub net.waterfox.waterfox" as suggested at https://www.waterfox.com/support/install-waterfox-linux/ . Now if I navigate to file:///home/jkingdon/work/set.mm/mmil.html (a URL which works in firefox) the error is "
File not foundWaterfox canโt find the file at /home/jkingdon/work/set.mm/mmil.html."
@soaproot@sfba.social @Waterfox@mastodon.social It could be Flatpak sandboxing. Have you tried checking its permissions in Flatseal?
-
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox honestly, I fail to see how it undermines trust, transparency, and user agency.
How, exactly?
Cc @skinnylatte @jbz
-
undefined filobus@sociale.network shared this topic on
-
@Longplay_Games @grahamperrin @Waterfox @skinnylatte @jbz Yeah I think the issue Waterfox is concerned about is the mechanistic interpretability of the model, not the intention of the developer/browser/prompt. They're fairly unpredictable almost by design. Not something you want in a browser, design-wise.
At least not at baseline. They do have information on how to add that kind of functionality in their documentation.
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox Hi, We're currently looking around for a new webbrowser on account of all the "AI" stuff, this statement looks promising, though, if We may, We'd like to hear some more direct statements about where Waterfox as a project stands. In decreasing order of relevance:
What are the politics of Waterfox? In general, but in particular regarding marginalized folks such as black and/or queer individuals? What critiques does the project usually get about its politics and what's the stance on those?
The blogpost focuses on the usage of "AI"/LLM in the context of webbrowser usage, but what is the stance on the technology of "generative" "AI" as a whole? In particular relating to the financial bubble around it, the slave labor necessary to create it, the poisoning of the web, climate destabilization and energy grid degradation that it causes? What about locally ran models?
The blogpost mentions that "LLMs have utility, measurably so" - Which is that?
The Waterfox repository has a folder for the Zed editor, of which a key feature is the integration of LLMs. Is "AI"/LLM produced code used in the Waterfox project? Are "AI"/LLM produced code contributions accepted?
The Waterfox.com 404 page includes the following image: https://www.waterfox.com/_astro/astronaut-nobg.CW-JfQlf_Z125kPS.png - Is this made by an artist, and, if so, whom?
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox I just downloaded Waterfox and am trying it out because of this statement. Looks good so far :)
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox@mastodon.social thank you.
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox Best Firefox alternative browser.
-
@Waterfox It depends on what LLM's are used when it comes to AI. I'd say Qwen and maybe DeepSeek when locally downloaded on one's own might be a good option.
I wouldn't take any other countries other than the open-source Chinese LLM's (especially Qwen), considering that most of them hallucinate purposely.
There's a study called "ChatGPT is bullshit", which is here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5
-
@ulfi where are you seeing that?
-
Some thoughts on Mozilla's trajectory and Waterfox's stance on AI in the browser ๐
https://www.waterfox.com/blog/no-ai-here-response-to-mozilla/?v=1
@Waterfox well put!