Could we build a governance protocol, something like Loomio, on top of ActivityPub?
General Discussion
5
Posts
3
Posters
32
Views
-
Could we build a governance protocol, something like Loomio, on top of ActivityPub? I’m thinking of a way to do federated governance. #fediverse #activitypub
-
Could we build a governance protocol, something like Loomio, on top of ActivityPub? I’m thinking of a way to do federated governance. #fediverse #activitypub
Like, how might we build a recursively complete self-governing protocol? #fediverse #activitypub
-
Like, how might we build a recursively complete self-governing protocol? #fediverse #activitypub
Yes, you could.
You might need to create a new JSON-LD name-spaxe for some things that aren't in ActivityPub yet.
But, it could be done.
...
Probably, most of the work is in creating the client front-end app.
-
Yes, you could.
You might need to create a new JSON-LD name-spaxe for some things that aren't in ActivityPub yet.
But, it could be done.
...
Probably, most of the work is in creating the client front-end app.
@reiver @heybenji there is a WIP FEP by @lax doing something like that https://codeberg.org/Laxystem/FEP/src/branch/main/fep/5a4f/fep-5a4f.md
-
@reiver @heybenji there is a WIP FEP by @lax doing something like that https://codeberg.org/Laxystem/FEP/src/branch/main/fep/5a4f/fep-5a4f.md
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@bengo i'm genuinely curious to hear your thoughts on this matter, because it seems to me like activitypub and fedi were never really on the same page, and the w3c spec diverged from the mastodon network almost before it was ever published. is there a path to fixing this within w3c cg/wg structure? what does that look like? are there any other paths?
-
> It's a bad and unfair idea [to make class 3 and 4 changes] [...] Totally respect your position if you disagree
i'm not super familiar with the w3c process but from a pragmatic standpoint what do you do when userspace is already broken and nothing is class conformant?
activitystreams was intended to describe streams of activities, and activitypub was intended for publishing activities to those streams of activities. no one in fedi does this. they syndicate posts and discard activities
-
@SimonTB @javahippie no fosdem for me unfortunately. Keep an eye out for the first commits. Still mulling over a testing strategy that is manageable and not too complex.
-
@tokyo_0 Whoever shows up and contributes. So you could!
-
@myfear @javahippie looks like what I've been wanting to build for a long time. Even similar tech stack (Java + Postgres). Guess it'll be hard to contribute as long as there's no existing code, right? But I'll keep an eye out for my chance to join #OpenPace :)
You guys don't happen to be at #FOSDEM to discuss about this project? Note: I'm not sure yet, if I can make it to FOSDEM this year.
-
@julian yes. BadgeFed has an API. But the concept is really simple, it is a Note (or Document) that has an attachment. The attachment is a property of the ActivityPub object usually used for videos or images. In this case the attachment includes a full OpenBadge object.
The only restriction is that the Note attributed (activitypub actor) MUST be the url in the OpenBadge issuer (issuer = actor). Also the recipient url from the OpenBadge SHOULD be mentioned in the Note.
With this simple mechanism you can pretty much create a compatible badge that can be decentralized with BadgeFed.
-
This needs integration with #GadgetBridge, of course
-
@mapache@hachyderm.io from what I understand you're using the ActivityPub note for compatibility. I wonder if a custom object type might open more doors.
Doesn't really matter, just thinking out loud 🙂
Does BadgeFed have an API to create new badges? Or fetch badges?
