Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Complete this sentence:

Fediverso
169 88 79

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @johannab No, not at all snarky. πŸ’•

    What is so interesting is to discern between the technical and social, and I think that most people have a very functional-technical perspective of what it means to communicate online, so to say. Consider it merely as extra channels to interact with others, more choice to connect.

    But of course our online social network is much more than merely a channel, and we have to 'project our social' somehow over these thin copper and fiberglass wires, while we try to make sense and interpret the social signals that come from other remote places.

    I think we underestimate the impact of communicating online, and the narrow 'social bandwidth' that our current networking tools support. Then we translate online situations to how we would behave offline and get wrong expectations, misconceptions, and subequenctly miscommunications.

    We are still all youngers online, still all learning the ropes, while we do social networking offline for 1,000's of years already.

    read more

  • @smallcircles

    Awesome!

    I hope my response didn't come off snarky, as that wasn't how I meant it - at worst I intended to be a bit pedantic. And relatable analogies are *always* at my fingertips when talking to the inexperienced or "non-tech" social network users, for sure.

    But *eventually* we need to draw people in to a little more media- and tech-literate understanding.

    I'm bookmarking your blog post, thanks - this is a topic in my current academic modules and my hoped-for masters capstone

    read more

  • @johannab

    What I particularly like in your definition, is that it makes clear that "fediverse" by itself indicates a pure technosphere. It enables social communication, and merely facilitates it. What people do on that channel, the way they communicate and how they interact with others then determines the social experience.

    SX starts to consider a social experience from the most personal perspective, where a person has individual needs wrt their online participation. Then using the "Pyramid of perspective" this scale up to consider inter-personal relationships, and at the top of the pyramid and at the largest scale we shape the constructs of society together.

    (Note that SX is a universal solution development methodology, even though it starts with a focus on social web and software development.)

    See also: https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#pyramid-of-perspective

    read more

  • @johannab

    That is a good, more matter of fact characterization to all the analogies indeed. Thank you.

    read more

  • @smallcircles

    Other: loosely-bound meta-network of more tightly-bound community or topical networks.

    I *describe my experience* using all kinds of analogies such as the other options in this poll.

    read more

  • @Curry @theraccoonbytes I was thinking of privately reaching out to Casey and PJ first (Kevin has barely used the instance) to see what their plans are for the future...

    and then maybe try to assemble a group of volunteers to see if anyone is interested in helping out with hosting, moderation, onboarding, community engagement, etc.

    For now whenever I can I browse their local timeline and interact with people to make them feel seen and valued...

    read more

  • @draNgNon thanks, some very good food for thought.

    I think the crucial point is that we do not know and do not offer proper ways to deal with different modes of communication, esp. if the only medium channel constitutes a stream of sticky notes, such as we have here in this space.

    On the first point, when is something an vs. a healthy interest area, I think depends how well one is able to cross the 'membranes' of all the various social contexts and information spaces one navigates online, as it were.

    There should be a place for 'influencing' to an extent if only to reach your crowd and build community and such. But all in balance and proportion and clear social context preferably. Non-profits and groups want to influence, we may want to be informed.

    To the last point. There's urgency to address the dark world situation, and either organize or lose. defines as a way to engage in constructive ..

    https://social.coop/@smallcircles/116159361728695210

    read more

  • @theraccoonbytes @_elena Are there specific measures I can be taking to help keep our beloved alive? Besides being active myself?

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • Ready for FediMTL!

    FediMTL fedimtl conference activitypub
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    16 Views
    @matt@writing.exchange nice! Will you be around tomorrow evening? Let's catch up!
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    18 Views
    @servus I know @_elena is interested in these topics as well, and may have some ideas for you.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    13 Views
    πŸ˜… πŸ˜‰ β›Ί 🚚 #emoji #poll
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    16 Views
    Apologies in advance if I misrepresented anybody or missed any crucial bits of information. Jesse Karmani (jesseplusplus@mastodon.social), Ted Thibodeau Jr. (tallted@mastodon.social, and Julian Lam (julian@activitypub.space) in attendance Julian provided an update on adoption of FEP 7888 Both Piefed and Lemmy have adopted 7888, and will begin publishing resolvable context collections in their next release Jesse opened a PR to Mastodon, which received preliminary approval from Gargron@mastodon.social (ed. it was later merged, rolled back, updated, a new PR opened, which was then merged) This PR is the first of two planned pull requests. The first generates the outgoing context (the same as what Lemmy/Piefed have done recently) The seconds handles incoming contexts and backfills Jesse was asked whether it would conflict with existing reply-tree crawling methods, but the two are complementary. She expects additional discussion before the PR is opened. Julian noted that it would be helpful if statistics/analytics were gathered by the Mastodon team to see how conversation contexts and backfill works at scale; admits that existing implementations and testing has been small scale and may not reflect real-world usage. Julian noted that Lemmy's implementation (nutomic@lemmy.ml) does not paginate their resolvable context implementation. All objects are listed in one OrderedCollection Jesse noted that she followed Mastodon's pagination convention for collections. Context inheritance Julian asked for opinions on whether contexts were inherited in existing implementations. Notes that NodeBB inherits parent context, but checks further up the known parent chain for further contexts Julian admits that not everybody can and should do this, is also not sure anymore whether NodeBB actually does this. Julian notes the ideal implementation would be every object referencing their immediate parent, which would lead to the entire collection referring to the same context collection. Jesse: Decodon inherits immediate parent context only Ted: notes that this is a reinvention of inReplyTo Julian and Jesse note that there are marked differences between crawling the reply chain. A short discussion about how netnews and usenet handled reply chains was had. Julian notes that Lemmy will not inherit context. Every object will point back to its own server's context collection. This was a conscious decision by Nutomic as each instance is meant to consider its own representation of remote content as the canonical representation ActivityPub.Space Julian made a short shout-out to a new site called ActivityPub.Space, meant to be a hub for AP development discussions ("A federated space for ActivityPub discussions so that they don’t just get lost in ephemeral replies") A short double-back to NNTP and how they approach "eventual consistency" Ted: β€œCloud of NNTP servers are all hosts of articles and replies.” Strictly speaking it’s not a reply tree as replies can be inReplyTo multiple parents