@nyhan the fuck

@nyhan It would be fun to go back in time to before I saw that and warn my past self.

@nyhan Why? Just why?

@nyhan No.
Nononono.
Nope.

@nyhan amazing

@nyhan I assume the page was built for a desktop and wasn't made properly responsive for smaller screens.

@nyhan thank you for the laugh!

@nyhan LOL 😱

@nyhan *twitches*

@nyhan Yikes. I might actually recognize this.

@nyhan you’ve been cursed to interpret incorrect numeric sequencing more than once this week!

@nyhan I'm not a librarian, but I'm horrified nonetheless.

@nyhan 😱🙀😭

I sincerely hope it will horrify everyone … with working eyes I wanted to write, but this abomination will also horrify users of screenreaders.

@nyhan they're not even alphabetized

@nyhan I should have believed the CW. Augh!

@nyhan That’s Evil.

@nyhan Amd people wonder why, within a couple of months of starting to use computers at work, I had switched to ISO 8601 date formats (though not having Internet access, I didn't know that for most of a decade).
I checked. ISO8601 came out in 1988, about when I was getting caught by the problem. Obviously something in the air then.

@nyhan I showed it to the former librarian sitting next to me, and she is suitably horrified.

@CordiallyChloe @nyhan I don't think it makes any more sense on a desktop.