@nyhan Yikes. I might actually recognize this.

@nyhan you’ve been cursed to interpret incorrect numeric sequencing more than once this week!

@nyhan I'm not a librarian, but I'm horrified nonetheless.

@nyhan 😱🙀😭

I sincerely hope it will horrify everyone … with working eyes I wanted to write, but this abomination will also horrify users of screenreaders.

@nyhan they're not even alphabetized

@nyhan I should have believed the CW. Augh!

@nyhan That’s Evil.

@nyhan Amd people wonder why, within a couple of months of starting to use computers at work, I had switched to ISO 8601 date formats (though not having Internet access, I didn't know that for most of a decade).
I checked. ISO8601 came out in 1988, about when I was getting caught by the problem. Obviously something in the air then.

@nyhan I showed it to the former librarian sitting next to me, and she is suitably horrified.

@CordiallyChloe @nyhan I don't think it makes any more sense on a desktop.

@resuna @nyhan

I say that bc it looks like there were probably 2 columns of links side-by-side and when shrunk to a smaller screen, the columns stacked, leaving the user with this view.

@resuna @nyhan altho...I guess the last few are still pretty confusing lolll

@nyhan
😱

@nyhan oh you don't have to be a librarian to be horrified by that.

@nyhan I'm not a librarian but I could fix that for them ...and I really hope that someone does!

@nyhan The longer I look at it the worse it gets.

@WizardOfDocs @nyhan, why would you want to make an alphabet of them?