Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Ho passato il primo giorno di festa a realizzare una bambola vodoo con mio figlio.#SpiritoDelNatale

Uncategorized
3 2 0

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • ROBOANTE (@roboante.bsky.social)

    Uncategorized fotografia
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    ROBOANTE (@roboante.bsky.social)https://bsky.app/profile/roboante.bsky.social/post/3majcbufppc2k> Una #fotografia a caso. Muschio 💚
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    🔴 UNHCR says “we never forget anyone”.Yet refugees in the Agadez “humanitarian center” remain stranded in the desert, adults & children, waiting for years for dignity, rights, answers.Forgetting them is a choice. #KeepEyesOnAgadez
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    0 Views
    @dansup ban hashtag spammers.
  • a random statistics question

    Uncategorized
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    @oblomov Yeah this all makes sense to me, and I can sort by variance to find the most/least agreement.However, an intermediate variance could be either two people agreeing and one really disagreeing OR everybody slightly disagreeing? It feels harder to "find" those values, if that makes sense.I guess I'm looking for some formula/function where a maximum value of the formula is one where two people agree and one disagrees. I'd even be fine if this was a specific per-person formula, like person A disagrees and people B and C agree and I just replicate that formula.Like one hypothetical to find one where A disagrees is:sqrt((B-A)^2 + (C-A)^2) - stdev(B, C)essentially the stdev with A as the mean (how much B and C disagree with A) and then counteract that value by subtracting the stdev of B and C (how much B and C agree)and this ~sort of works but also still has very high values in ways that don't make sensemostly curious if I'm just making stuff up or there's something obvious I should consider