Chat Control 1.0 lets Big Tech scan ALL your messages.
-
@Tutanota Thank goodness my country opposes to this madness, but I hope other countries will do the same.
@anotheridiotontheweb @Tutanota There are countries opposing this? How many? And which ones? (I guess Ive been hearing a lot of the negative stuff lol)
-
Chat Control 1.0 lets Big Tech scan ALL your messages. đÂ
And the EU wants this to continue. Decision is this WEDNESDAY.
âĄÂ Call your MEPs now! âĄÂ
âĄď¸ https://fightchatcontrol.eu/@Tutanota a reminder that considering mechanisms to circumvent this abominable law once it's implemented misses a critical issue:
Circumventing the scanning puts you on the wrong side of the law, making you fair game for prosecution. You are now in the same bucket as the terrorists and CSAM distributors.
This is a classic authoritarian catalyst: change the law so you can "legally" persecute your enemies.
These kinds of power grabs must be stopped before they are approved in the first place.
-
#ChatControl must be stopped because it:
đ¨ Undermines Europe's digital sovereignty
đ¨ Weakens everybody's security
Curious if your emails are safe? Check here which providers scan your data:
đ https://tuta.com/blog/voluntary-scanning-google-microsoft@Tutanota How do you propose to detect people recruited by the KGB to commit acts of sabotage? https://theins.ru/news/278528
-
@Tutanota I can send messages over gmail that Google can't scan because gmail supports IMAP 4, and my mail client supports GPG encrypted email. Google can still see subject lines and email addresses, but not the contents of those messages. My open-source mail client is not provided by Google. The catch: I don't know people who normally use GPG.
-
@anotheridiotontheweb @Tutanota There are countries opposing this? How many? And which ones? (I guess Ive been hearing a lot of the negative stuff lol)
@child_of_God @Tutanota As far as I've checked, there are 4 or 6 countries opposing, including Italy.
-
@gilraen79 Incredibile ma vero.
@Azarilh @gilraen79 Ma davvero? O_O
-
@reiddragon @Tutanota Unfortunately "this shit" is part of the "world on fire" issue. Imagine Nazis getting to power after chat control is implemented and we all are screwed.
-
@Nic3 @Tutanota @AboutSignalNL
Signal won't be legal under such legislation.
@didek @Tutanota @AboutSignalNL so, the Chat Control is gonna lose :) (atleast that is what i think/hope)
-
@Tutanota I can send messages over gmail that Google can't scan because gmail supports IMAP 4, and my mail client supports GPG encrypted email. Google can still see subject lines and email addresses, but not the contents of those messages. My open-source mail client is not provided by Google. The catch: I don't know people who normally use GPG.
-
@Tutanota wtf again??????
@aeva We know right. đ
-
@jg @Tutanota GPG is used a lot more than one would think if you include indirect uses such as signing Debian packages. For "in case the house burns down" backups, I wrote a program that sets up a LUKS file system on a flash drive and mounts it, with the LUKS password (a long random one) stored on the flash drive in a GPG-encrypted file. I keep the flash drive with my house keys and don't take my GPG keyring with me.
-
undefined 77nn@goto.77nn.it shared this topic on