Listen, Bluesky fails in moderation and when it happens, you're 100% silenced.
-
Listen, Bluesky fails in moderation and when it happens, you're 100% silenced. But Mastodon teams regularly fail in moderation too, and some of them have influence which spreads through the fedi. Not sure it's much better.
https://aftermath.site/bluesky-charlie-kirk-dead-rest-in-piss -
Listen, Bluesky fails in moderation and when it happens, you're 100% silenced. But Mastodon teams regularly fail in moderation too, and some of them have influence which spreads through the fedi. Not sure it's much better.
https://aftermath.site/bluesky-charlie-kirk-dead-rest-in-piss@osma In my humble opinion, it's impossible to have a perfect moderation, one that got all my nuances, for free, on a millions user social network.
You can have that, just on decentralized social networks, if you own the instance, or the pds.
Or if you are a journalist and it's owned by your newspaper.Then you're responsible for what you say, and for what your readers understand.
-
@osma In my humble opinion, it's impossible to have a perfect moderation, one that got all my nuances, for free, on a millions user social network.
You can have that, just on decentralized social networks, if you own the instance, or the pds.
Or if you are a journalist and it's owned by your newspaper.Then you're responsible for what you say, and for what your readers understand.
No, you can't. If you own the server/instance/pds you're less likely to be completely thrown out, but no less likely to be silenced (by intent or error) with practically no recourse. Federation/decentralization just changes the management of moderation.
Responsibility over what you say bears little relation to moderation actions taken by unrelated third parties.
@luca -
No, you can't. If you own the server/instance/pds you're less likely to be completely thrown out, but no less likely to be silenced (by intent or error) with practically no recourse. Federation/decentralization just changes the management of moderation.
Responsibility over what you say bears little relation to moderation actions taken by unrelated third parties.
@lucathe point, for me, is that by using bluesky or blacksky , or mastodon.social , to some extent you are exchanging timeline discoverability with mass moderation.
If you own the server, nobody can tell you what to write.
Of course, if those servers label/silence your content, less people will read you, but that to me is more fair.You can't have the cake and eat it
I think I'm a relatively decent person, I can behave properly without a third part
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@JessTheUnstill (I think you mean Kirk's shooter's SO right?)
-
@aeva This is why we threw our hands up and said, just use what's already been done. We outsource "where are the space things" to NAIF SPICE: https://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/naif/aboutspice.html (there's also the rust rewrite, ANISE, but we don't trust that at my place of work yet)
-
Jesus fucking Christ.
Now people are saying Kirk's girlfriend is trans...
-
Par๐ฎ๐นle nยฐ1350 6/6
โฌ๐ฉโฌโฌโฌ
โฌ๐ฉโฌโฌโฌ
โฌ๐ฉโฌ๐จ๐ฉ
โฌ๐ฉ๐จโฌ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฉโฌโฌ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
https://pietroppeter.github.io/wordle-it/
-
@antanicus il click day del bonus monopattino era piรน dignitoso
-
The "bella ciao" thingโhere's an explanation...
-
Trieste Next, oltre cento eventi sulla ricerca scientifica
@scienza (HASHTAG)
Il festival in programma dal 26 al 28 settembre
-
@talksina @storiespettinate per curiositร , perchรฉ ad un cliente dovrebbe interessare da chi รจ scritto un articolo, una volta che la qualitร , il copyright e i diritti sono ok? Io valuterei solo il ritorno di investimento e la fiducia in chi lo propone. Di sicuro la AI รจ un concorrente difficile per i contenti creator: gli articoli poco importanti, lettere formali o cose di questo tipo li faccio scrivere direttamente da AI. Se uso un intermediario รจ perchรฉ voglio un parere di un esperto.
