Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Cerulean)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Fediverso
  4. Have you seen this news?

Have you seen this news?

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Fediverso
mastodonfediversee2ee
192 Post 56 Autori 6 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • jaz@toot.walesundefined jaz@toot.wales

    @evan @benpate

    >I think it's good to give people the privacy they need

    To be super clear, so do I. I just don't want to be the person giving it to them.

    >Would you be more inclined to support E2EE on a server where you control who uses it, like mastodon.iftas.org?

    Me personally, no, I will trust my highly-sensitive data to a very focussed, reputable org that does this for a living.

    (I honestly don't remember who hosts that server. Every once in a while I have to go look it up.)

    evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    evan@cosocial.ca
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #121

    @jaz @benpate That's interesting, thanks!

    jaz@toot.walesundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • evan@cosocial.caundefined evan@cosocial.ca

      @jaz @benpate That's interesting, thanks!

      jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      jaz@toot.wales
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #122

      @evan @benpate I'll put tongue firmly in cheek and ask you if you would recommend to a dear friend that they should use E2EE services to preserve the privacy of their most sensitive data from a company whose privacy policy is uncertain which country the service is located in, and doesn't publish any terms of service?

      evan@cosocial.caundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • jaz@toot.walesundefined jaz@toot.wales

        @evan @benpate I'll put tongue firmly in cheek and ask you if you would recommend to a dear friend that they should use E2EE services to preserve the privacy of their most sensitive data from a company whose privacy policy is uncertain which country the service is located in, and doesn't publish any terms of service?

        evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        evan@cosocial.ca
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #123

        @jaz @benpate I don't understand who you are talking about. IFTAS, SWF, cosocial.ca, Emissary, toot.wales, Mastodon? Also using technology from that company, or preserving privacy from that company?

        I think users should use E2EE messaging for as many conversations as they can. Using encryption technology that is open source, reviewed by security pros, and based on open standards is the best.

        evan@cosocial.caundefined jaz@toot.walesundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
        0
        • benpate@mastodon.socialundefined benpate@mastodon.social

          Have you seen this news?

          #Mastodon just got funding to add end to end encryption into their software.

          So, some time next year, you’ll be able to send truly private messages to the vast majority of the #Fediverse

          Im so excited about this.

          Because it’s an open spec, this opens the doors for every Fediverse app to join the party.

          Yesterday, this project was a proof of concept. Today, Mastodon has turned it into a stampede.

          #E2EE

          https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/

          felis_catus_domesticus@mastodon.cloudundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          felis_catus_domesticus@mastodon.cloudundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          felis_catus_domesticus@mastodon.cloud
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #124

          @benpate

          E2E encryption is great. Not including that from the start was a glaring oversight.

          As for the other changes, well.. Mastodon the platform that sells itself on de-centralization is moving towards.. centralization. I have long said that Mastodon is just Telegram, if Telegram were designed by a group of idiots.

          The euros in the fediverse seem dead set on making Mastodon a premier censorship platform.

          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0
          • evan@cosocial.caundefined evan@cosocial.ca

            @jaz @benpate I don't understand who you are talking about. IFTAS, SWF, cosocial.ca, Emissary, toot.wales, Mastodon? Also using technology from that company, or preserving privacy from that company?

            I think users should use E2EE messaging for as many conversations as they can. Using encryption technology that is open source, reviewed by security pros, and based on open standards is the best.

            evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            evan@cosocial.ca
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #125

            @jaz @benpate my question was in particular about operating a server. I think there's a higher level of trust between users and server operators when there's a real-world relationship, like a business, household, non-profit or club.

            jaz@toot.walesundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            0
            • evan@cosocial.caundefined evan@cosocial.ca

              @jaz @benpate I don't understand who you are talking about. IFTAS, SWF, cosocial.ca, Emissary, toot.wales, Mastodon? Also using technology from that company, or preserving privacy from that company?

              I think users should use E2EE messaging for as many conversations as they can. Using encryption technology that is open source, reviewed by security pros, and based on open standards is the best.

              jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              jaz@toot.wales
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #126

              @evan @benpate

              I'm suggesting that a company, any company, whose privacy policy states "if this server is in jurisdiction X then certain things apply, but if not, then maybe something else" /and/ does not provide a terms of service, whosoever that company may be, they would not be my first choice for trusting them with my highly-sensitive messages, and nor would the software they may have created and distributed to keep those messages safe.

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              0
              • evan@cosocial.caundefined evan@cosocial.ca

                @jaz @benpate my question was in particular about operating a server. I think there's a higher level of trust between users and server operators when there's a real-world relationship, like a business, household, non-profit or club.

                jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                jaz@toot.wales
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #127

                @evan @benpate for sure, real-world relationships between you and your encryption provider would be strong trust foundations.

                evan@cosocial.caundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                0
                • jaz@toot.walesundefined jaz@toot.wales

                  @evan @benpate for sure, real-world relationships between you and your encryption provider would be strong trust foundations.

                  evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  evan@cosocial.ca
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #128

                  @jaz @benpate I thought you were concerned from the other direction, as a server operator.

                  jaz@toot.walesundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  0
                  • evan@cosocial.caundefined evan@cosocial.ca

                    @jaz @benpate I thought you were concerned from the other direction, as a server operator.

                    jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    jaz@toot.wales
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #129

                    @evan @benpate I guess the clarification is I don't have real-world connections with the 15,000 people signed up on the service I operate.

                    Again, I am in favour of encrypted messaging services. I do not want to provide such a service personally.

                    evan@cosocial.caundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    0
                    • jaz@toot.walesundefined jaz@toot.wales

                      @evan @benpate I guess the clarification is I don't have real-world connections with the 15,000 people signed up on the service I operate.

                      Again, I am in favour of encrypted messaging services. I do not want to provide such a service personally.

                      evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      evan@cosocial.caundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      evan@cosocial.ca
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #130

                      @jaz @benpate yeah, absolutely. I think other people who run public servers may have the same concerns. I have a lot less concern with my colleagues at SWF, for example.

                      jaz@toot.walesundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      0
                      • evan@cosocial.caundefined evan@cosocial.ca

                        @jaz @benpate yeah, absolutely. I think other people who run public servers may have the same concerns. I have a lot less concern with my colleagues at SWF, for example.

                        jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        jaz@toot.walesundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        jaz@toot.wales
                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                        #131

                        @evan @benpate 100%, you should get to do whatever you want to do for your family, colleagues, or 15,000 person server (if that's your desire).

                        My original reply is in reference to the original post about E2EE being added to Mastodon, which has has historically kind of sort of not been super great on the admin-gets-to-choose front, so I'm on record now saying make it optional for admins, or I have to pass the torch.

                        sturmsucht@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                        0
                        • benpate@mastodon.socialundefined benpate@mastodon.social

                          Have you seen this news?

                          #Mastodon just got funding to add end to end encryption into their software.

                          So, some time next year, you’ll be able to send truly private messages to the vast majority of the #Fediverse

                          Im so excited about this.

                          Because it’s an open spec, this opens the doors for every Fediverse app to join the party.

                          Yesterday, this project was a proof of concept. Today, Mastodon has turned it into a stampede.

                          #E2EE

                          https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/

                          ddlyh@topspicy.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          ddlyh@topspicy.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          ddlyh@topspicy.social
                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                          #132

                          @benpate
                          Ruins communication with #Tootik and #snac2 and #honk and other JS-less Fedi software though?

                          benpate@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                          0
                          • ddlyh@topspicy.socialundefined ddlyh@topspicy.social

                            @benpate
                            Ruins communication with #Tootik and #snac2 and #honk and other JS-less Fedi software though?

                            benpate@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            benpate@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            benpate@mastodon.social
                            scritto su ultima modifica di
                            #133

                            @ddlyh

                            First, I'd just like to say that the notification summary on my phone read "Ben Pate ruins communication with..." and I said oh god, what has that asshole done now...

                            To be serious:

                            Yes and no. You obviously can't have E2EE if one side can't run actual software. Those platforms might manage keys and decrypt for you on the server, but that kind of breaks the spirit of E2EE.

                            More likely, those platforms would just not publish encryption keys, and continue sending plaintext messages.

                            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                            0
                            • benpate@mastodon.socialundefined benpate@mastodon.social

                              Have you seen this news?

                              #Mastodon just got funding to add end to end encryption into their software.

                              So, some time next year, you’ll be able to send truly private messages to the vast majority of the #Fediverse

                              Im so excited about this.

                              Because it’s an open spec, this opens the doors for every Fediverse app to join the party.

                              Yesterday, this project was a proof of concept. Today, Mastodon has turned it into a stampede.

                              #E2EE

                              https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/

                              nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social
                              scritto su ultima modifica di
                              #134

                              @benpate I love that almost immediately after the announcement of potentially adding E2EE support there are a whole lot of posts saying "how dare they give us encryption!"

                              Like even if you have... some kind of bugaboo about it, it doesn't hurt you if it's there... It does, however, help protect a lot of users.

                              (And I'll never understand the "first fix absolutely everything else before adding anything new!" mentality. A. people can do two things at once, that's one of the great things about having more than one person working on a thing and B. there will always be something else that needs fixing. That is the nature of reality and imperfect things... If everything else must be fixed first, nothing would ever get done. Literally. We'd still be trying to perfect pointy sticks.)

                              benpate@mastodon.socialundefined benroyce@mastodon.socialundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
                              0
                              • nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.socialundefined nazokiyoubinbou@urusai.social

                                @benpate I love that almost immediately after the announcement of potentially adding E2EE support there are a whole lot of posts saying "how dare they give us encryption!"

                                Like even if you have... some kind of bugaboo about it, it doesn't hurt you if it's there... It does, however, help protect a lot of users.

                                (And I'll never understand the "first fix absolutely everything else before adding anything new!" mentality. A. people can do two things at once, that's one of the great things about having more than one person working on a thing and B. there will always be something else that needs fixing. That is the nature of reality and imperfect things... If everything else must be fixed first, nothing would ever get done. Literally. We'd still be trying to perfect pointy sticks.)

                                benpate@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                benpate@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                benpate@mastodon.social
                                scritto su ultima modifica di
                                #135

                                @nazokiyoubinbou

                                So true, and I’m so glad you said this. I’ve been holding back on so many super-snarky replies that I really shouldn’t post publicly 😇

                                The biggest thing I’m seeing is fear.. fear of change, and fear of the unknown.

                                No, the E2EE solution we’re building isn’t perfect (nothing is) but it’s been vetted by some very smart people who care deeply about getting this right.

                                So, most of the hot takes dissipate once you clarify the questions and alleviate the fear.

                                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                0
                                • benpate@mastodon.socialundefined benpate@mastodon.social

                                  Have you seen this news?

                                  #Mastodon just got funding to add end to end encryption into their software.

                                  So, some time next year, you’ll be able to send truly private messages to the vast majority of the #Fediverse

                                  Im so excited about this.

                                  Because it’s an open spec, this opens the doors for every Fediverse app to join the party.

                                  Yesterday, this project was a proof of concept. Today, Mastodon has turned it into a stampede.

                                  #E2EE

                                  https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2026/04/sovereign-tech-agency-funding/

                                  mikebabcock@floss.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                  mikebabcock@floss.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                  mikebabcock@floss.social
                                  scritto ultima modifica di
                                  #136

                                  @benpate I'm reminded of an old adage, Zawinski's Law: "Every program attempts to expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand are replaced by ones which can." I've always thought it was stupid. Not the law. The fact that it happens. I already have perfectly good messaging systems, I don't need another one. Can't programs just stick to doing what they do well and let other programs do what they do well?
                                  I already have RCS, Signal, WhatsApp, Instagram, oh and E-mail ...

                                  benpate@mastodon.socialundefined benroyce@mastodon.socialundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
                                  0
                                  • rusty__shackleford@mastodon.socialundefined rusty__shackleford@mastodon.social

                                    @sampler @benpate @dusk

                                    Done, no AI used so criticism is welcome:
                                    https://pen.waltuh.cyou/autumn/the-social-web-foundation-adds-end-to-end-encryption-to-mastodon-and-why-this

                                    dusk@todon.euundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                    dusk@todon.euundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                    dusk@todon.eu
                                    scritto ultima modifica di
                                    #137

                                    @rusty__shackleford @sampler @benpate

                                    Great read! Thanks for taking the time to write and share

                                    rusty__shackleford@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                    0
                                    • jaz@toot.walesundefined jaz@toot.wales

                                      @evan @matt @benpate

                                      Groups.

                                      Also, groups.

                                      Then groups.

                                      😂

                                      paride5745@mastodon.bsd.cafeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                      paride5745@mastodon.bsd.cafeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                      paride5745@mastodon.bsd.cafe
                                      scritto ultima modifica di
                                      #138

                                      @jaz @evan @matt @benpate and Nomadic Identities!

                                      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                      0
                                      • jaz@toot.walesundefined jaz@toot.wales

                                        @evan @benpate 100%, you should get to do whatever you want to do for your family, colleagues, or 15,000 person server (if that's your desire).

                                        My original reply is in reference to the original post about E2EE being added to Mastodon, which has has historically kind of sort of not been super great on the admin-gets-to-choose front, so I'm on record now saying make it optional for admins, or I have to pass the torch.

                                        sturmsucht@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                        sturmsucht@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                        sturmsucht@mastodon.social
                                        scritto ultima modifica di
                                        #139

                                        @jaz

                                        Ok, I'm confused. What are your concerns exactly about E2EE in the fediverse? Is it added complexity for server admins?

                                        As an user living through this period of the internet I barely see a reason why I wouldn't want E2EE for anything with direct personal communication. In fact I choose services exactly for that.

                                        Shouldn't good E2EE be able to operate securely especially under hostile conditions? And is that not the point of open standards to do so?

                                        @evan @benpate

                                        jaz@toot.walesundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                        0
                                        • dusk@todon.euundefined dusk@todon.eu

                                          @rusty__shackleford @sampler @benpate

                                          Great read! Thanks for taking the time to write and share

                                          rusty__shackleford@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                          rusty__shackleford@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                          rusty__shackleford@mastodon.social
                                          scritto ultima modifica di
                                          #140

                                          @dusk
                                          @sampler @benpate

                                          I do need to update with new info/ best practices, but this is the gist of my logic surrounding the issue, thank you so very much for reading it!

                                          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                          0

                                          Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

                                          Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

                                          Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

                                          Registrati Accedi
                                          Rispondi
                                          • Risposta alla discussione
                                          Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                                          • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                                          • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                                          • Più Voti


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 5
                                          • 6
                                          • 7
                                          • 8
                                          • 9
                                          • 10
                                          Feed RSS
                                          Have you seen this news?
                                          @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                                          V4.10.1 Contributors
                                          • Accedi

                                          • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                                          • Primo post
                                            Ultimo post