Time to get back to reading this garbage.
-
Time to get back to reading this garbage.
“Some artists and creative thinkers have experimented with hallucinatory drugs precisely because they want to try to think the unthinkable. The AI ability to hallucinate might be a strength in creative endeavors.”
-_-
-
Time to get back to reading this garbage.
@Moosader what is it and why are you reading it, out of interest?
-
“Some artists and creative thinkers have experimented with hallucinatory drugs precisely because they want to try to think the unthinkable. The AI ability to hallucinate might be a strength in creative endeavors.”
-_-
-
@Moosader what is it and why are you reading it, out of interest?
@theTangentSpace Because other teachers wanted to read it, so I insert myself into any of the AI-related spaces on campus to be inconvenient and fact-check and dispute everything.
-
“Some artists and creative thinkers have experimented with hallucinatory drugs precisely because they want to try to think the unthinkable. The AI ability to hallucinate might be a strength in creative endeavors.”
-_-
@Moosader AI could beat you up and steal your lunch money and they’d call it a feature
-
@Moosader AI could beat you up and steal your lunch money and they’d call it a feature
@garrison It is simply TEACHING YOU how to DEFEND YOURSELF as a way to prepare for bigger threats down the line!
-
“Some artists and creative thinkers have experimented with hallucinatory drugs precisely because they want to try to think the unthinkable. The AI ability to hallucinate might be a strength in creative endeavors.”
-_-
@Moosader that feels like a joke, how can someone write that completely seriously 😭
-
“Some artists and creative thinkers have experimented with hallucinatory drugs precisely because they want to try to think the unthinkable. The AI ability to hallucinate might be a strength in creative endeavors.”
-_-
"Originality is about thinking the unthinkable, and AI appears on track to do this better than humans. It is hardly a surprise that many artists also display occasionally odd and antisocial behavior: it might be a feature of creative thinking."
The irony will probably be lost on everyone as they find me odd and antisocial during these meetings.
-
"Originality is about thinking the unthinkable, and AI appears on track to do this better than humans. It is hardly a surprise that many artists also display occasionally odd and antisocial behavior: it might be a feature of creative thinking."
The irony will probably be lost on everyone as they find me odd and antisocial during these meetings.
"Science is also about new ideas and new knowledge. Since scientists are humans and therefore social beings, the scientific method is also constrained by human confirmation bias and myriad other inherited or learned social and cultural biases."
So the expected inference here is that humans bad at science so let LLM do it instead??
-
@theTangentSpace Because other teachers wanted to read it, so I insert myself into any of the AI-related spaces on campus to be inconvenient and fact-check and dispute everything.
@Moosader sweet. I'm I'm secondary education and my employer is very keen on AI, it's annoying
-
"Originality is about thinking the unthinkable, and AI appears on track to do this better than humans. It is hardly a surprise that many artists also display occasionally odd and antisocial behavior: it might be a feature of creative thinking."
The irony will probably be lost on everyone as they find me odd and antisocial during these meetings.
@Moosader This whole "But AI can drive originality" angle drives me fucking bananas. The entire bloody point, the fundamental working mechanism of these systems is statistically-driven standardised homogeneisation. It's the antithesis of the thing!
-
"Science is also about new ideas and new knowledge. Since scientists are humans and therefore social beings, the scientific method is also constrained by human confirmation bias and myriad other inherited or learned social and cultural biases."
So the expected inference here is that humans bad at science so let LLM do it instead??
@Moosader what the fuck
-
@theTangentSpace Because other teachers wanted to read it, so I insert myself into any of the AI-related spaces on campus to be inconvenient and fact-check and dispute everything.
@Moosader
Thank you for your perseverance 😊
@theTangentSpace -
"Science is also about new ideas and new knowledge. Since scientists are humans and therefore social beings, the scientific method is also constrained by human confirmation bias and myriad other inherited or learned social and cultural biases."
So the expected inference here is that humans bad at science so let LLM do it instead??
Still the book authors have twice emphasized how they didn't have AI write the book or design the book cover.
Wonder why they're afraid of admitting a thing like that? 🤔
-
Still the book authors have twice emphasized how they didn't have AI write the book or design the book cover.
Wonder why they're afraid of admitting a thing like that? 🤔
"Ai can already design book covers (not ours), do a voice-over, create summary podcasts of text, write scripts, build credible video ads, and force Johnny Cash to sing "Barbie Girl.""
Just no second thought at "forcing" somebody to do something without consent, eh?
-
"Science is also about new ideas and new knowledge. Since scientists are humans and therefore social beings, the scientific method is also constrained by human confirmation bias and myriad other inherited or learned social and cultural biases."
So the expected inference here is that humans bad at science so let LLM do it instead??
@Moosader Considering LLMs are trained on social media posts with cultural biases, I don't think they will be any less social or culturally biased than the humans they are designed to mimic.
-
"Ai can already design book covers (not ours), do a voice-over, create summary podcasts of text, write scripts, build credible video ads, and force Johnny Cash to sing "Barbie Girl.""
Just no second thought at "forcing" somebody to do something without consent, eh?
"Some artists will focus on using AI to do tedious and repetitive jobs (like generating backgrounds for animations"
These authors are never allowed to watch a Studio Ghibli movie ever again. They are BANNED.
-
@Moosader This whole "But AI can drive originality" angle drives me fucking bananas. The entire bloody point, the fundamental working mechanism of these systems is statistically-driven standardised homogeneisation. It's the antithesis of the thing!
@VileLasagna @Moosader Exactly. It seems that the research into this topic finds a major risk of "homogenous output" from "LLM-assisted" writing (worse still, it seems to linger even after the tools are not used by participants so they're making their own writing trend towards the mean sentence just by using such tools previously). Which you'd expect given they are just a tool for creating statistically likely word sequences.
-
"Some artists will focus on using AI to do tedious and repetitive jobs (like generating backgrounds for animations"
These authors are never allowed to watch a Studio Ghibli movie ever again. They are BANNED.
"It is easy to imagine AI writing an endless stream of Fast and Furious movies or bland (but mildly appealing) pop hits. Photography has given us both extraordinary new forms of art and an endless stream of selfies."
Tired sexist trope of selfies being shallow, not art, not expression, worth less than a "true" work of art.
-
"It is easy to imagine AI writing an endless stream of Fast and Furious movies or bland (but mildly appealing) pop hits. Photography has given us both extraordinary new forms of art and an endless stream of selfies."
Tired sexist trope of selfies being shallow, not art, not expression, worth less than a "true" work of art.
@Moosader wild for an AI proponent to suggest that things human beings literally created are not art