Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Is anyone using Mastodon as their primary social media and is it working for you?

Uncategorized
474 458 0

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @scottjenson I think making UX improvements to DMs is a great idea.

    One of the biggest privacy problems with Mastodon DMs now is that people accidentally make them public.

    Separating the private mention UI from the public posting UI will probably avoid a huge percentage of those user errors.

    It'd be a big win for privacy.

    read more

  • @scottjenson encryption that still works if one of the parties changes fediverse servers seems like it maybe technically challenging

    I also would note that a lot of my interactions on the Fediverse are not very “microblogging” focused. Ie this response isn’t a blog post.

    I largely use DMs here for private but non sensitive content (like “hey your url is broken” or “you have a typo on that post”

    read more

  • read more

  • @scottjenson Thanks for asking! I'm a big fan of Encrypting All The Things, but my impression here is that the dangers of PMs on Mastodon have more to do with the potentially confusing UX, so I think addressing the UX issues would help the most in the short term.

    Ultimately, I want users to be able to assume "private" means encrypted, so I'm very glad that's part of the plan. Yes, people can use Signal, but there's still a need to privately transmit one's Signal username at a minimum. Also, private threads can stem from public threads, so it's natural to have some facility for privacy here. Finally, I'm a huge Signal fan, but its centralization means a single point of failure, and makes it a huge target for authoritarian state actors, and I worry about it going down or being compromised.

    I would like to see more visual distinction between public and private posts, like different coloring, so fewer people confuse them.

    read more

  • @scottjenson I must request encryption, because even though I don't need it right now. ...
    A - you never know when you might need it
    B- if I did, I might feel really uncomfortable telling you the reason, so I'm gonna assume that I'm piping up for some of those folks.

    read more

  • @jfred You're not the only person asking for this. It's a resonable suggestion (but I can't comment on the implementation complexity)

    read more

  • @scottjenson My take is encryption is important, but not important enough that you shouldn't make UX improvements before having it

    I particularly would like to see the list of mentions decoupled from the list of recipients, though I wonder if that might cause problems with replies from some software... but still

    read more

  • @mray Well first of all we have a shipping product (warts and all) and improving it is important to do even outside of encryption (I mean I hear your point but I'm saying we'll improve the UX independently as, honestly, it's got lots of issues that need fixing.)

    But I agree with you empathically that proper key management is a horribly difficult thing to get right and almost always makes the UX very challenging to "be seemless"

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    Poking at the ESP32-P4 and -C6 Dies in an ESP32-P4-M3 ModuleThe RF section of the ESP32-C6 die. (Credit: electronupdate, YouTube)With the ESP32-P4 not having any wireless functionality and instead focusing on being a small SoC, it makes sense to combine it with a second chip that handles features like WiFi and Bluetooth. This makes the Guition ESP32-P4-M3 module both a pretty good example of how the P4 will be used, and an excellent opportunity to tear into, decap and shoot photos of the dies of both the P4 and the ESP32-C6 in this particular module, courtesy of [electronupdate]. There also the blog post for those who just want to ogle the shinies.After popping the metal shield on the module, you can see the contents as in the above photo. The P4 inside is a variant with 32 MB of PSRAM integrated along with the SoC die. This results in a die shot both of this PSRAM and the P4 die, though enough of the top metal seems to remain to clearly see the latter.The Boya brand Flash chip is quite standard inside, and along with a glance at the inside of one of the crystal oscillators we get to glance at the inside of the C6 MCU. This is a much more simple chip than the P4, with the RF section quite obvious. The total die sizes are 2.7 x 2.7 mm for the C6 and 4.29 x 3.66 mm for the P4.youtube.com/embed/-Nu0tjDCbbM?…hackaday.com/2026/02/19/poking…
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    0 Views
    @fetchezlavache 😂
  • May I tap into Mastodon's hive mind?

    Uncategorized askfedi
    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1 Views
    @eyeling perfect. hook her up with critically acclaimed mmorpg final fantasy xiv
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    0 Views
    @stefano Maybe it would be needed some additions."Excluding languages stating memory-safety. They shall not allow writing mutually memory unsafe operations like volatiles, memory mapped I/Os. Let those to be written in other languages and sanely link with it with warnings."