Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Uncategorized
  4. Il mio post leggero-nostalgico-curioso di ieri ha ricevuto tante interazioni.

Il mio post leggero-nostalgico-curioso di ieri ha ricevuto tante interazioni.

Uncategorized
123 39 823
Log in to reply

Feed RSS
Il mio post leggero-nostalgico-curioso di ieri ha ricevuto tante interazioni.

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
@pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
Post suggeriti
  • anarchiversitario@poliversity.itundefined

    Onda anomala: ultima generazione a processo.

    Uncategorized
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    anarchiversitario@poliversity.itundefined
    Onda anomala: ultima generazione a processo. cosa cambia con il nuovo pacchetto sicurezza. intervista all’avvocata paola bevere@anarchia “Onda Anomala”- Notizie eventi movimenti dal clima che cambia, la trasmissione quindicinale di Radio Onda d’Urto all’interno della casetta degli attrezzi del martedi pomeriggio alle
  • pressenza_italia@mastodon.unoundefined

    Cosa c’entra Leonardo con il genocidio a Gaza?

    Uncategorized
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    1 Views
    g3rt@mastodon.unoundefined
    @pressenza_italia Con Leonardo (Min. dell’Economia e delle Finanze italiano detiene il 30%) l’Italia è complice attivo dei crimini di Israele.Leonardo fornisce:- i cannoni navali da 76 mm delle Sa’ar israeliane, testati su Gaza dal 16/11/2023- elicotteri da addestramento AW119, aerei M-346 “Lavi”- rimorchi cisterna per l’esercito Idf, contratti firmati mentre i bombardamenti su Gaza erano già in corso- radar congiunti con RADA, in una joint venture italo-israeliana quotata anche a Tel Aviv
  • hongminhee@hollo.socialundefined

    @silverpill@mitra.social @phnt@fluffytail.org

    Uncategorized
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    hongminhee@hollo.socialundefined
    @silverpill@mitra.social @phnt@fluffytail.org @silverpill@mitra.social is right that maintainers hold real authority here, and I want to build on that rather than argue against either of you. The frustration with LLMs is largely legitimate. But “how does this look to outsiders” is a poor criterion for evaluating ethical concerns; by that standard, feminism looks like lunacy to 4chan. The question is whether the concerns are correct, not whether they're legible to the unconvinced. That said, I don't think making LLMs socially unacceptable is a viable path, and not just because the adoption curve has run too far. The maintainer's authority is real precisely because it's specific: you decide what enters your project. Refusing AI-assisted contributions is a legitimate choice. But declaring LLM use itself impermissible starts to look like “I only accept patches written in Vim, not IDE-generated code”—a demand that grows harder to justify as the tools become ordinary. As maintainer of Fedify, I've taken a middle path: disclose what you used, show you've tested it yourself, and we're fine. See also https://github.com/fedify-dev/fedify/blob/main/AI_POLICY.md. What worries me more is that the “total rejection vs. total acceptance” framing leaves the actual problem untouched. If we stay inside that binary, OpenAI and the others keep the models, keep the surplus, keep the compute bills externalized onto the climate—with no pressure to change any of it. The ethical problems with LLMs aren't properties of the technology; they're properties of who owns it and under what terms. I've written about this in more depth if it's of interest: Histomat of F/OSS: We should reclaim LLMs, not reject them and a follow-up Acting materialistically in an imperfect world: LLMs as means of production and social relations.
  • rsiinfo@mastodon.socialundefined

    Preghiera di guerra nella Sala Ovale, fede o politica

    Uncategorized
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2 Views
    filobus@sociale.networkundefined
    @rsiinfo pastori evangelici che non hanno mai letto il vangelo