Skip to content
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • World
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categories
  • Old Web Site
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • Users
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • World
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categories
  • Old Web Site
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Tags
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Fediverso
  4. I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky

I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverso
331 Posts 107 Posters 2.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

    If you sign up with https://blacksky.community you get:

    - Blacksky's "appview"/web frontend
    - Optionally, Blacksky's PDS
    - Blacksky's moderation layer (and you can optionally enable Bluesky's too)

    Almost-complete independence! What I'm not clear on is to whether, or to what degree Blacksky relies on Bluesky's "relay":

    swetland@chaos.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
    swetland@chaos.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
    swetland@chaos.social
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    @mcc Oh that is interesting. If they are (or are soon to be) operating their own relay, things are definitely further along than I thought as far as actual bsky federation (instead of just handwaving the bsky team does whenever anyone grumbles about their screwy moderation policies or whatnot) goes.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

      No. Because "Gertrude", in our hypothetical, *won't bother making those posts*. Because the vast, incredible, overwhelming majority of Bluesky users are still on the Bluesky network, and she is excommunicated. She *could* cultivate a group of followers who all use the Northsky infrastructure just so they can see her posts. But she could also cultivate a following on her Patreon. So Hypothetical Gertrude ignores Bluesky, posts to Patreon, and her Patreon posts get *shared* to Bluesky. (3/3)

      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined This user is from outside of this forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined This user is from outside of this forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @mcc technically mastodon dot social could grow big enough to also become this kind of dickface. but i'm talking hypothetical, you're talking reality. with more fragmentation, bsky would become stronger as a network. this is a message we can push on bsky central itself.

      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

        @gbargoud Sure. You could do that. I'm aware of a patch to the PDS (backend) software that allows it to flat out publish via ActivityPub. I haven't seen a *frontend* that merges the streams yet though.

        There's also the problem that you can't reeeallly monitor *just part* of the Bluesky network. To follow part of it you're supposed to drink the entire firehose and filter out the parts you care about.

        swetland@chaos.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
        swetland@chaos.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
        swetland@chaos.social
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @mcc @gbargoud It would seem like maybe this could be mitigated a bit by a (hosted) service that operates a filtered relay feed -- which drinks from the full network firehose, but lets downstream users small instances/servers subscribe to a subset view of that (based on accounts/hashtags/filters to observe).

        msh@coales.coundefined 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • groupnebula563@mastodon.socialundefined groupnebula563@mastodon.social

          @mcc it really is a shame that there was all that racism happening. I've been seeing less and less of it, and hopefully it gets taken care of altogether soon so everyone (except bigots, they can fuck right off) feels welcome on fedi

          jef@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
          jef@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
          jef@mastodon.social
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          @GroupNebula563 @mcc Would be nice! Won't happen though.

          groupnebula563@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

            I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky.

            My expectation was it was unlikely we'd ever see this happen because "federation" on ATProto means basically reproducing the entirety of the Bluesky software stack. In old Big Data terms, on ActivityPub your instance is a "horizontal shard" of the network; ATProto forces full DB replicas only.

            Still, we're seeing movement on this front, which I'd split into two categories:

            1. Your fault (you reading this)
            2. Aaron Rodericks's fault

            txtechnician@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
            txtechnician@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
            txtechnician@mastodon.social
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            @mcc Bluesky is a venture capital shit show in the making. The rug pull will happen in the next decade.

            I did not know about the fighting between black devs and the queer community.??? What is the lore there.

            Cuz it sux that they went the way of atproto over activity pub.

            benroyce@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

              @mcc technically mastodon dot social could grow big enough to also become this kind of dickface. but i'm talking hypothetical, you're talking reality. with more fragmentation, bsky would become stronger as a network. this is a message we can push on bsky central itself.

              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
              mcc@mastodon.social
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              @lritter I think this happening with m.s is a real risk, but the thing I'd point to to say it hasn't happened in practice is that m.s is probably the most blocked instance and none of the instances blocking m.s seem unhappy!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • julian@activitypub.spaceundefined julian@activitypub.space shared this topic on
              • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                If you sign up with https://blacksky.community you get:

                - Blacksky's "appview"/web frontend
                - Optionally, Blacksky's PDS
                - Blacksky's moderation layer (and you can optionally enable Bluesky's too)

                Almost-complete independence! What I'm not clear on is to whether, or to what degree Blacksky relies on Bluesky's "relay":

                jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                jdp23@neuromatch.social
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                @mcc Right now, its only Blacksky's feeds and moderation service that are using their own relay.

                They're not currently running their own AppView (although a lot of people are confused about this -- I even saw Masnick get it wrong) . They're working on this and saying it should be out fairly soon, at which point I believe the plan is to have blacksky.community switch over (or maybe offer the choice of which AppView to use, the way deer.social currently does). I assume their AppView will use their own Relay but haven't verified this.

                Another current dependency is on Bluesky's platform-level moderation, the automatied scanning for CSAM, malware, and spam. At the technical level it's easily replaceable -- Bluesky outsources it -- but it's not cheap (especially since video is supported); Rudy estimated $160,000/year.

                mcc@mastodon.socialundefined nlupo@amikejo.xyzundefined 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jrose@social.belkadan.comundefined jrose@social.belkadan.com

                  @mcc For my own understanding: while the server architecture is different, the same thing could happen on the Fediverse, right? (Except portability is worse.) The only thing saving it is that mastodon.social is only the plurality of users, maybe a majority, but not the overwhelming majority?

                  mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                  mcc@mastodon.social
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  @jrose I mean, observably, a *lot* of servers are outright blocking mastodon.social and the users seem entirely happy.

                  The question is whether a non mothership community can be viable without the mothership. That's the case on Mastodon. Bluesky isn't close and we're only now starting to see *movement toward* it getting close. The difference between 51% and 99.9% is meaningful.

                  megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • alter_kaker@hachyderm.ioundefined alter_kaker@hachyderm.io

                    @mcc I'm curious, but I haven't had any time to look into this, so if you know off the top of your head, cost aside, how much work/knowledge does it take to stand up the whole stack at this point? Does Blacksky, for example, or Northsky, have their software available and documented? I think that it would be fun to try to try, but I have limited time and this isn't really my specialization.

                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                    mcc@mastodon.social
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    @alter_kaker I'm not the person to ask. I would join the Bluesky API Touchers discord (yes, it's really named that) and ask there.

                    Blacksky has all their software on GitHub (they are using a mix of original Bluesky software and their own stuff) but not instructions on how to deploy it as a whole stack.

                    mat@friendica.exon.nameundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined jdp23@neuromatch.social

                      @mcc Right now, its only Blacksky's feeds and moderation service that are using their own relay.

                      They're not currently running their own AppView (although a lot of people are confused about this -- I even saw Masnick get it wrong) . They're working on this and saying it should be out fairly soon, at which point I believe the plan is to have blacksky.community switch over (or maybe offer the choice of which AppView to use, the way deer.social currently does). I assume their AppView will use their own Relay but haven't verified this.

                      Another current dependency is on Bluesky's platform-level moderation, the automatied scanning for CSAM, malware, and spam. At the technical level it's easily replaceable -- Bluesky outsources it -- but it's not cheap (especially since video is supported); Rudy estimated $160,000/year.

                      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                      mcc@mastodon.social
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      @jdp23 "They're not even running their own appview"

                      I don't understand. What is the website I have been using to access bluesky for the last month, then?

                      jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                        And that's why I say, TLDR:

                        - I am legitimately excited about the work being done by Blacksky Algorithms! I am using their frontend and happy with it.

                        - Northsky is an interesting development to watch

                        - If you're on a Bluesky PDS, I recommend migrating off with one of these tools https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ii5jchdzlmcojjw4dqczcgkh/post/3lyt6t6qfa22u

                        - Everything Sucks. A LOT of things would have to change at a social level for *any* entity other than Bluesky to have power or independence in the ATP ecosystem. I still don't trust Bluesky.

                        aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                        aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                        aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        @mcc do you think this work (on Blacksky or northsky's part) will lead to more independent atproto towers showing up in the future?

                        mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                          @jdp23 "They're not even running their own appview"

                          I don't understand. What is the website I have been using to access bluesky for the last month, then?

                          jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                          jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                          jdp23@neuromatch.social
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          @mcc it's a client (aka app) that uses an appview -- currently the Bluesky appview

                          mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place

                            @mcc do you think this work (on Blacksky or northsky's part) will lead to more independent atproto towers showing up in the future?

                            mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                            mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                            mcc@mastodon.social
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            @aeva "Tower", that's a good word for it.

                            I think observably, the fact blacksky exists as a full stack (or at least end to end) example *is* inspiring more towers to stand up, and I'd put northsky as the example. (Or so I assume, I don't know for a fact the order of events.)

                            mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                              @aeva "Tower", that's a good word for it.

                              I think observably, the fact blacksky exists as a full stack (or at least end to end) example *is* inspiring more towers to stand up, and I'd put northsky as the example. (Or so I assume, I don't know for a fact the order of events.)

                              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                              mcc@mastodon.social
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              @aeva The question as always with ATP though is "why?". That is *why* would anyone bother splitting from bluesky. What we've seen so far is two demographic communities with reasons to distrust platforms they don't operate themselves.

                              So like who else would bother? You wouldn't see like, a fishing community standing up their own tower because they have no reason to expect Bluesky will target them specifically, and it costs so much more than running a Mastodon instance.

                              cthos@mastodon.cthos.devundefined swetland@chaos.socialundefined jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined jdp23@neuromatch.social

                                @mcc it's a client (aka app) that uses an appview -- currently the Bluesky appview

                                mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                mcc@mastodon.social
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                @jdp23 oh dear.

                                jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                                  @jrose I mean, observably, a *lot* of servers are outright blocking mastodon.social and the users seem entirely happy.

                                  The question is whether a non mothership community can be viable without the mothership. That's the case on Mastodon. Bluesky isn't close and we're only now starting to see *movement toward* it getting close. The difference between 51% and 99.9% is meaningful.

                                  megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                  megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                  megmac@social.treehouse.systems
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  @mcc @jrose and I'm pretty sure m.s isn't even close to 51% anyways, whether in terms of total accounts or active accounts. I think it's more like 30%ish eyeballing fedidb.com's stats.

                                  There are over 30k distinct activitypub servers out there, all with their own moderation policies, for better or worse.

                                  mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined megmac@social.treehouse.systems

                                    @mcc @jrose and I'm pretty sure m.s isn't even close to 51% anyways, whether in terms of total accounts or active accounts. I think it's more like 30%ish eyeballing fedidb.com's stats.

                                    There are over 30k distinct activitypub servers out there, all with their own moderation policies, for better or worse.

                                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mcc@mastodon.social
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    @megmac @jrose I think the interesting question to me is whether the mastodon ggmbh "market share" of the fediverse is going up or down over time. If they're at 30% now that sounds like they're trending down.

                                    megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                                      @aeva The question as always with ATP though is "why?". That is *why* would anyone bother splitting from bluesky. What we've seen so far is two demographic communities with reasons to distrust platforms they don't operate themselves.

                                      So like who else would bother? You wouldn't see like, a fishing community standing up their own tower because they have no reason to expect Bluesky will target them specifically, and it costs so much more than running a Mastodon instance.

                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.devundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.devundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      @mcc @aeva Is there a good breakdown of the overall costs? Like I saw a lightweight AppView implementation still has to store roughly 2 gb of data per day, indefinitely, and...that's a _lot_ of storage.

                                      I assume there's also a fair amount of bandwidth and other cost involved.

                                      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • alter_kaker@hachyderm.ioundefined alter_kaker@hachyderm.io

                                        @mcc I'm curious, but I haven't had any time to look into this, so if you know off the top of your head, cost aside, how much work/knowledge does it take to stand up the whole stack at this point? Does Blacksky, for example, or Northsky, have their software available and documented? I think that it would be fun to try to try, but I have limited time and this isn't really my specialization.

                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.clubundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.clubundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.club
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        @alter_kaker @mcc hmm, apparently not that much knowledge is required, and the cost dropped significantly, I still don't trust any of it though

                                        https://whtwnd.com/bnewbold.net/3lo7a2a4qxg2l

                                        alter_kaker@hachyderm.ioundefined lrhodes@merveilles.townundefined ikuturso@mastodon.socialundefined 3 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                                          @megmac @jrose I think the interesting question to me is whether the mastodon ggmbh "market share" of the fediverse is going up or down over time. If they're at 30% now that sounds like they're trending down.

                                          megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                          megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined This user is from outside of this forum
                                          megmac@social.treehouse.systems
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          @mcc @jrose I suspect their share goes up when there's a mass migration event and goes down otherwise, because in a mass migration event people want the easy answer and that's the easy answer the Mastodon website gives them. But otherwise there's probably a lot of accounts on m.s that don't stick around, while people on other instances might be more sticky (at least unless their instance shuts down).

                                          It's been a while since one of those migrations came here so I think overall that's probably correct.

                                          mcc@mastodon.socialundefined ikuturso@mastodon.socialundefined 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 16
                                          • 17
                                          Feed RSS
                                          I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky
                                          @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                                          V4.10.0 Contributors
                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post