free open source software needs fewer engineers and more designers and product people
-
@m000gletje @TodePond Yeah “use our software! It’s inconvenient!” is very obviously a bad sales pitch nobody will listen to - often motivated by the strange idea that you should, as a moral imperative, suffer to use technology
look, i've had my ride with trying to be a sysadmin, sure it's fun to have your own services you can fuck around in without the approval of anyone
but it shouldn't be a necessity and rather something you can get into if you want
actually foss/generally tech nerds should be forced to go outside, touch grass and interact with the normies so they can get off their imaginary selfhosted planet and get a grip on reality
-
free open source software needs fewer engineers and more designers and product people
@TodePond I guess without large amount of state funding it's not going to happen, especially from an accessibility standpoint.. Until then I guess we have to make do with people mostly making software for themselves
-
@TodePond I guess without large amount of state funding it's not going to happen, especially from an accessibility standpoint.. Until then I guess we have to make do with people mostly making software for themselves
@yaxu strongly disagree! there are huge incentives for designers and product people to get involved with volunteering, just like programmers.
and yes accessibility is a huge factor of this. getting design and product-oriented people involved means software becomes accessible to more people
-
free open source software needs fewer engineers and more designers and product people
@TodePond@mas.to and technical writer
-
free open source software needs fewer engineers and more designers and product people
@TodePond@mas.to FOSS engineers at the very concept of UX:
-
@yaxu strongly disagree! there are huge incentives for designers and product people to get involved with volunteering, just like programmers.
and yes accessibility is a huge factor of this. getting design and product-oriented people involved means software becomes accessible to more people
@TodePond Fair enough, I should be more optimistic!
-
we gave the tech nerds too much power
@TodePond this is true in many fields
-
@yaxu strongly disagree! there are huge incentives for designers and product people to get involved with volunteering, just like programmers.
and yes accessibility is a huge factor of this. getting design and product-oriented people involved means software becomes accessible to more people
@TodePond what are the incentives?
-
@TodePond what are the incentives?
@flpvsk the same incentives that keeps bazillions of engineers involved
-
@TodePond I guess without large amount of state funding it's not going to happen, especially from an accessibility standpoint.. Until then I guess we have to make do with people mostly making software for themselves
-
we gave the tech nerds too much power
but okay, how do we fix this?
we need to make space for design and product work within collaborative open source software somehow. there's PLENTY of space to walk into if you're a dev: make an issue / make a pull request / make a fork / use a package / blah blah blah
but there's none if you're a designer / producty person. what do you do??????
-
"[just] use IRC"
"[just] use a forum"
"[just] self-host by shushing into your prill scropt. it's easy you [just] prantiss a few cuntwobs. what's the big deal? there's no excuse. [just] spin up a brosh instance."@TodePond prill scropt is overrated, people should realize it's much simpler to just dweedle their stingmesh like a normal human being. not sure what all the fuss is about. you don't even need a fuzzlebus in most cases
-
but okay, how do we fix this?
we need to make space for design and product work within collaborative open source software somehow. there's PLENTY of space to walk into if you're a dev: make an issue / make a pull request / make a fork / use a package / blah blah blah
but there's none if you're a designer / producty person. what do you do??????
the industry does not work like this at all! but open source completely omits product design
-
the industry does not work like this at all! but open source completely omits product design
THIS THREAD IS FACETIOUS AND TONGUE IN CHEEK AND OVERZEALOUS IN ORDER TO SHAKE UP AND CHALLENGE EXISTING NORMS DO NOT TAKE IT ALL AS 100% ACCURATE AND COME FOR ME
-
free open source software needs fewer engineers and more designers and product people
@TodePond You could put the bully pulpit down, and show us the FOSS discord alternative you and your designer buddies have been working on for free that is good enough for your highness?
-
@TodePond You could put the bully pulpit down, and show us the FOSS discord alternative you and your designer buddies have been working on for free that is good enough for your highness?
@hopeless found the dev
-
@hopeless found the dev
@TodePond No FOSS work, just posts on social media?
-
THIS THREAD IS FACETIOUS AND TONGUE IN CHEEK AND OVERZEALOUS IN ORDER TO SHAKE UP AND CHALLENGE EXISTING NORMS DO NOT TAKE IT ALL AS 100% ACCURATE AND COME FOR ME
is it as simple as surfacing the figma file of your open source project as highly as your repo?
can we start the readme with our user stories instead of "how to run locally"?
should we use project tracking? should we A/B test??
should we moodboard????
-
@TodePond No FOSS work, just posts on social media?
@hopeless yeah i don't do any FOSS work it's true
-
"[just] use IRC"
"[just] use a forum"
"[just] self-host by shushing into your prill scropt. it's easy you [just] prantiss a few cuntwobs. what's the big deal? there's no excuse. [just] spin up a brosh instance."@TodePond it’s on the fediverse. You can find it on Matrix. It’s on LiberaChat. It’s on gotosocial with ads. It’s literally on Pleroma. You can find it on Pleroma. Watch now on Pleroma.