@mcc I so want this too. Moreover, I want some kind of standard/standardized compact/agreement/declaration/license that F/OSS projects individually could reference to declare that they agree with and enforce this stance: no "AI" contributions whatsoever. Have not yet found such a thing.

I agree that the distro level is the right place for this, but there's an argument to be made that it should go all the way down.

One thing for sure, I’ve got a fire under my butt to get out of 1password pretty quick.

@johnlehet Yes; I am attempting to describe the product sold as "AI code assistants" without using the word "AI". It did not occur to me that "code" was ambiguous/a pun when I made the post.

@mcc Yes. I get that. So when you say “random code generators” you mean various LLMS inputting into the code base? Damn. I thought you meant that AIs were involved in the password generation, which as I understand it would also suck badly.

@ariadne okay. when i said "linux distribution" i was thinking "a collection of all the software you need to run a computer system" as that's what a distribution traditionally meant. (the existence of flathub somewhat complicates what i want, but like I said, I was being vague and flippant)

@LovesTha if i can export between password managers, but both password managers are infected with the same problem, does this help? what's dashlane? is it good?

@mcc to be clear the proposed anti-AI policy only applies to the alpine project itself.

@mcc I'd argue that password managers are very easy to jump between. They tend to have good export and import functions. I've transitioned from keepass to dashlane to bitwarden to vaultwarden with little effort.