“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn.
Uncategorized
65
Posts
53
Posters
0
Views
-
In fact, I do read all the details before signing up for anything. Everybody should, especially now, because the stakes are a lot higher than they used to be.
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen
The problem is, for most people they need the service they are registering with (or at least think they do). Not signing is not an option, so what’s the point of reading the small print?
For example, I want the security updates on my iPhone. I have to click ‘accept’ to get them. The alternative is effectively to brick my phone.
It’s a scandal, and law makers the world over are not getting a grip. -
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen this is why I don't have a blue tick
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen damn, thanks for looking into this. I naively did the verification some time ago and embarrassingly did not pay attention to the details. Time for me to get them to delete my data…
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen I'm curious to know if your deletion request and objection to the DPO were acknowledged/honored?
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen for the sake of completeness - this persona: https://vmfunc.re/blog/persona/ #privacy #security #persona
-
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen
The problem is, for most people they need the service they are registering with (or at least think they do). Not signing is not an option, so what’s the point of reading the small print?
For example, I want the security updates on my iPhone. I have to click ‘accept’ to get them. The alternative is effectively to brick my phone.
It’s a scandal, and law makers the world over are not getting a grip.@KimSJ
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen
The law does recognise this and the reality is a lot of these clickwrap "adhesion contracts" are extensively modified by consumer law. This can make interpretation difficult as I guess we see here.I don't even bother with the fine print for financial services products because the industry is heavily regulated and they can just change the terms anyway. What am I going to do, pay off my mortgage because I don't like clause 45.6.7? 😕
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen When your Linkedin account is blocked because you have dis/reconnected and made several profile modifications in a few times, you must follow the Lk verification procedure (🇪🇺ID card, no selfie) to be able to regain access to account 1 or 2 days later. When you ask for deletion of your data of an account closed months/year before (online 1 account at a time), GDPR service reply: compliance w/ DPR at their discretion depending on whether they want to keep them, have not to justify.
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
OMG!
"And then there’s the weird stuff:
Hesitation detection — they tracked whether I paused during the process
Copy and paste detection — they tracked whether I was pasting information instead of typing it
Behavioral biometrics. On top of the physical biometrics. For a LinkedIn badge."
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen I started the process twice in the past year - both times my spidey-sense started tingling and I didn’t scan any documents.
Anthropic, AWS, OpenAI, Google, GrokAI… why would you need all of those as sub-processors?? Unless you’re using “subprocessor” as a means to share the data…
Thanks for confirming my gut feeling. And for posting this warning for others!
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen I deleted my profile instead. It was only a source of useless notifications and spam.
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen Wow, I quite linkedin years ago, look how smart was that. Anyway out of all the stuff on the list, the least expected and most scary seems the behavioural profiling. Hesitation detection? WT_?!
-
Wouldn't it make more sense to read those before uploading your personal documents?
@EverydayMoggie it would , but it took him an entire weekend to go through it, while the verification process is 3 minutes. @Ivovanwilligen
-
In fact, I do read all the details before signing up for anything. Everybody should, especially now, because the stakes are a lot higher than they used to be.
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen there's literally not enough time in a person's life to evaluate all the TOSs and EULAs of companies they interact with. With every business you enter and every commercial website you visit, you agree to TOS. And they get updated all the time too!
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen does anybody know, from a legal perspective, how something like this sits with GDPR saying data can't be processed outside of the EU (or I guess, GDPR respecting countries?
I suppose that's all buried in the terms and conditions somewhere.... "you consent to..."
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen at Christmas I purchased a mini bottle of Japanese cider online as a stocking filler, something similar happened, was redirected to a third party service called verifymyage, to which I was supposed to upload my documents — they also employ "age estimation" by "analysing physical features". Of course I refused to participate in this insanity, and I eventually could do it with the supplier manually. But it's insane that this was the default and I even had to ask.
-
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen
The problem is, for most people they need the service they are registering with (or at least think they do). Not signing is not an option, so what’s the point of reading the small print?
For example, I want the security updates on my iPhone. I have to click ‘accept’ to get them. The alternative is effectively to brick my phone.
It’s a scandal, and law makers the world over are not getting a grip.@KimSJ @EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen Not everyone has the time to read and understand the details and implications of what's written.
Governments should hold those companies accountable and protect our privacy.
-
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen
The problem is, for most people they need the service they are registering with (or at least think they do). Not signing is not an option, so what’s the point of reading the small print?
For example, I want the security updates on my iPhone. I have to click ‘accept’ to get them. The alternative is effectively to brick my phone.
It’s a scandal, and law makers the world over are not getting a grip.@KimSJ
The lawmakers do have a grip. They are part of it. Do you think it's a coincidence that "age" (identity) verification is suddenly being pushed by politicians all over the world at the same time?Something big is happening behind the scenes. Who of the lawmakers are movers and who are mere pieces is still unclear to me.
@EverydayMoggie @noodlemaz @Ivovanwilligen -
@Ivovanwilligen The slow but complete erosion of privacy.
Its a bit worse than that. Its the creation of permanent surveillance.
-
@noodlemaz@mstdn.games
With respect, I made it work for me.
It's clear all corporate social media see biometrics as another commodity they can sell, and they got there by people sighing and accepting them commodifying user data.
Pointing out people shouldn't just shrug and go along with unreasonable requests, isn't "being like that".I wish people would sometimes understand that just shrugging and going along with stuff is a one way ticket to societal incarceration FOR EVERYBODY.
-
“I wanted the blue checkmark on LinkedIn. The one that says “this person is real.” In a sea of fake recruiters, bot accounts, and AI-generated headshots, it seemed like a smart thing to do.
So I tapped “verify.” I scanned my passport. I took a selfie. Three minutes later — done. Badge acquired. I felt a tiny dopamine hit of legitimacy.
Then I did what apparently nobody does. I went and read the privacy policy and terms of service.
Not LinkedIn’s. The other company’s”
https://thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedin-identity-verification-privacy/
@Ivovanwilligen very interesting. Thanks!
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Fermato per omicidio volontario il poliziotto che ha ucciso mansouri. falsificate le prove, il 28enne era disarmato. e (ora) il governo tace
@anarchia
Eseguito il fermo, disposto dalla Procura di Milano, di Carmelo Cinturrino, il poliziotto e assistente capo accusato di omicidio volontario nei confronti di
-
@box464 you and me both
-
@miaq that's great news! Come visit!
-
@aeva *does something to make you have a new rule*
-
@aeva @oblomov @glyph Sure, as long as doing that doesn't break something else in your codebase (which it probably won't, buuuut...)
-
Gli effetti politici dell'algoritmo di feed di X
Il passaggio da un feed cronologico a uno algoritmico ha aumentato il coinvolgimento e ha spostato l'opinione politica verso posizioni più conservatrici, in particolare per quanto riguarda le priorità politiche, la percezione delle indagini penali su Donald Trump e le opinioni sulla guerra in Ucraina.
Abbiamo scoperto che l'algoritmo promuove contenuti conservatori e declassa i post dei media tradizionali. L'esposizione a contenuti algoritmici porta gli utenti a seguire account di attivisti politici conservatori, che continuano a seguire anche dopo aver disattivato l'algoritmo,
-
remember the golden rule:
please don't make me have to add new rules
-
L'Islanda punta a votare rapidamente per l'adesione all'UE.
Un referendum sulla ripresa dei negoziati di adesione era previsto per il 2027, ma potrebbe avvenire già ad agosto.
Se gli islandesi voteranno sì, potrebbero entrare a far parte dell'UE prima di qualsiasi altro paese candidato, ha affermato una delle due persone.https://www.politico.eu/article/iceland-fast-track-vote-eu-membership/
