#AdventOfCode #Day3
Uncategorized
3
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
Soooo... I think my "high-level brain" is starting to conflict with #rust.
This works, but:
* clippy wants to me to rewrite a loop to use iterators, but I don't get why it'd be better
* I think I should be using pass-by-reference rather than values in a few places
* that type on my parse function looks scary
* I am using Vec but this all looks pretty static so I feel it should all be arrays? dunno.
* I miss named argumentshttps://gist.github.com/riffraff/d674119aa3740275967fd6f14b77cba6
-
Soooo... I think my "high-level brain" is starting to conflict with #rust.
This works, but:
* clippy wants to me to rewrite a loop to use iterators, but I don't get why it'd be better
* I think I should be using pass-by-reference rather than values in a few places
* that type on my parse function looks scary
* I am using Vec but this all looks pretty static so I feel it should all be arrays? dunno.
* I miss named argumentshttps://gist.github.com/riffraff/d674119aa3740275967fd6f14b77cba6
@riffraff I think clippy just wants you to avoid you using indexing. You can mix for loops with iterators. So for example use `for value in numbers.iter().take(wanted) {` instead of the range. Which also makes the calculation of `end` easier to understand.
-
@riffraff I think clippy just wants you to avoid you using indexing. You can mix for loops with iterators. So for example use `for value in numbers.iter().take(wanted) {` instead of the range. Which also makes the calculation of `end` easier to understand.
@tamme indeed, but I do want the index in this case (it's part of the return value), so I need enumerate() and max_by_key() and at that point it becomes messier to my eyes ๐คทโโ๏ธ
EDIT: although I guess I can use enumerate and the same max, and that's what you meant with mixing for an iterators ๐ค
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
์ฌํด๋ฅผ ๋ง๋ฌด๋ฆฌํ๋ ๋ธ๋ก๊ทธ ๊ธ์ ์ฐ๊ณ ์๋๋ฐ, ์ฌํด ๋ญ๊ฐ ํ ๊ฒ ๋ง๊ธด ํ๊ตฌ๋โฆ
-
@tamme indeed, but I do want the index in this case (it's part of the return value), so I need enumerate() and max_by_key() and at that point it becomes messier to my eyes ๐คทโโ๏ธ
EDIT: although I guess I can use enumerate and the same max, and that's what you meant with mixing for an iterators ๐ค
-
@riffraff I think clippy just wants you to avoid you using indexing. You can mix for loops with iterators. So for example use `for value in numbers.iter().take(wanted) {` instead of the range. Which also makes the calculation of `end` easier to understand.
-
#parle
Par๐ฎ๐นle nยฐ1430 4/6โฌ๐จโฌโฌโฌ
โฌโฌ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฉ
๐จโฌ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฉ
-
Current status: itโs squirrelly out!
#BikeTooter #NHwx
-
@EndlessMason @ttscoff
Yeah, it's also possible to not do that, either.
-
-
@ttscoff you could, also, just boost the original toot.
