I wrote in support of @thisismissem's letter saying that ATProto and ActivityPub ecosystems ought to engage kindly and constructively with each other.
-
I wrote in support of @thisismissem's letter saying that ATProto and ActivityPub ecosystems ought to engage kindly and constructively with each other. https://writings.thisismissem.social/statement-on-discourse-about-activitypub-and-at-protocol/
I have explained my thinking more here: https://github.com/swicg/general/pull/45#issuecomment-3263275752
We face a lot of threats, especially ones greater than each other right now. We should challenge each other, but it is worth engaging so in a constructive way.
-
I wrote in support of @thisismissem's letter saying that ATProto and ActivityPub ecosystems ought to engage kindly and constructively with each other. https://writings.thisismissem.social/statement-on-discourse-about-activitypub-and-at-protocol/
I have explained my thinking more here: https://github.com/swicg/general/pull/45#issuecomment-3263275752
We face a lot of threats, especially ones greater than each other right now. We should challenge each other, but it is worth engaging so in a constructive way.
Note that it isn't that I am unwilling to critique ATProto. I have written the most cited critiques of ATProto on the internet.
Critique is good. And challenging each other is good.
But let's be constructive and kind.
-
undefined fosstodon.org ha condiviso questa discussione
-
Note that it isn't that I am unwilling to critique ATProto. I have written the most cited critiques of ATProto on the internet.
Critique is good. And challenging each other is good.
But let's be constructive and kind.
@cwebber facts. You can disagree, and even point out weaknesses, challenges, and pitfalls without being rude or unkind. Even simple bluntness doesn't require saying things like, "any idiot would know this"
I /like/ when people point out where I failed, and things I've failed to consider so I can consider those
-
undefined Piero Bosio ha condiviso questa discussione
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@piero @notizie E per via di "centralizzato / decentralizzato" non avrei idea di come si possa fare a far capire ai profani. A parte il solito esempio del numero telefonico e la mail.
Tu non dovresti preoccuparti di quale istanza segue la persona con cui dialoghi. Le grandi aziende sono riuscite a far diventare inconsueto quello che è normale (vedi telefono e mail)
-
@piero @notizie La faccenda della verifica dell'età e il controllo chat, sempre adducendo la solita scusa dei bambini, è un modo per SCHEDARE le persone. Oggi ti dicono "sei anonimo se guardi i siti porno" ma i dati loro ce li hanno. Poi passano a mandarti pubblicità, poi a crearti problemi (di qualsiasi tipo) se non rispetti i canoni voluti dal politico. Che per carità potrebbe essere destra o sinistra, a quel livello là il colore importa il giusto.
-
@bkardell how so?
-
@evan seems like this particular poll might be just slightly biased
-
They call options related to this "feature" "get a room", which somehow makes it more annoying.
-
OK, Discourse (the forum software, not "the discourse" about any current news) made me mad today, and that's not something that ever happens. I love Discourse, but this one is crazy.
I get mad when someone PMs me, and this damned forum software is telling people to do it behind my back. This is a support forum for an Open Source project, people are not allowed to ask for private help without paying for it. It is bonkers to recommend taking public conversations private.
-
julian Oh, you're right. I never did it manually and they must have defederated for some reason.
Sorry, but I absolutely hadn't noticed this, so I'd say the problem with NodeBB is solved then
-
@hongminhee It's a place where our loosey goosey style goes into nondeterminism. We should tighten it up in the next version. My main answer would be: publishers, don't do that.
