Test post please do not upvote
Fediverse
8
Posts
6
Posters
20
Views
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
You can't tell me what to do
-
You can't tell me what to do
Thank you for confirming that federation is up and running on MULTIVERSE
-
Thank you for confirming that federation is up and running on MULTIVERSE
Dimensional transmission indeed functioning as anticipated
-
Dimensional transmission indeed functioning as anticipated
Greetings from the anarcho-antirealist universe. Hail and well met.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Please, use the lemmy test instances
If you don't, you will end up having your instance blocked.
-
Please, use the lemmy test instances
If you don't, you will end up having your instance blocked.
MULTIVERSE is not federated with lemmy.ml, as they have a very high proportion of users and staff who break our Rule 2 on Limited Authoritarianism
-
MULTIVERSE is not federated with lemmy.ml, as they have a very high proportion of users and staff who break our Rule 2 on Limited Authoritarianism
lemmy.ml is different from voyager.lemmy.ml. The latter is just a testing instance.
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
> @emb@lemmy.world said in Pluralistic: The online community trilemma:
>
> a) A community of like-minded people;
>
> b) Useful information; and
>
> c) The largest possible audience.Calling it now. Join @fediverse@lemmy.world to discuss the fediverse. Join the smaller @fediverse@piefed.social to discuss the fediverse and rag on tankies.
/s?
-
It's at least something to explain what the title's referencing. Acknowleding that smaller audiences are often preferred doesn't really seem at odds with that. It just points to A and B having higher priority than C, right?
But people should just read the article, it's pretty quick and has more context than the quote.
-
I would say that’s not actually the key quote at all, especially since the author states that many times finding a smaller audience is the goal.
-
This, worded in far more technical terms than I had understood back at the time, is one of the reasons why I've always opposed the idea of "merging" communities in the Fediverse. Merging views is fine, but merging the communities themselves and all that this means (focus, themes, memberships, rules, censorships, timezones...) is just Not.
-
Key quote for the curious:
They [the paper he's discussing] conclude that there's a community-member's "trilemma": a set of three priorities that can never be fully satisfied by any group. The trilemma consists of users' need to find:
a) A community of like-minded people;
b) Useful information; and
c) The largest possible audience.
The thing that puts the "lemma" in this "trilemma" is that any given group can only satisfy two of these three needs. It's hard to establish the kinds of intimate, high-trust bonds with the members of a giant, high-traffic group, but your small, chummy circle of pals might not be big enough to include people who have the information you're seeking.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
About batched votes? Yeah I did, just haven't responded yet 👍
-
Did you receive my email from last Thursday? Seems there might be some delivery problem.
