Infinite loop in C++
Uncategorized
6
Posts
3
Posters
0
Views
-
Infinite loop in C++
-
Infinite loop in C++
I use them both, but I try not to mix them.
I think that "for (;;)" looks cooler but it doesn't read as well as "while(1)" or "while(true)"
To understand why "while(true)" works, you only have to know the "while" syntax. I think even if you know the "for" syntax, it's not obvious that it will even compile without {stuff}, and it's also not obvious that an empty test condition will evaluate "true".
As for do..while, I just don't like reading a code block before I know the loop conditions.
-
I use them both, but I try not to mix them.
I think that "for (;;)" looks cooler but it doesn't read as well as "while(1)" or "while(true)"
To understand why "while(true)" works, you only have to know the "while" syntax. I think even if you know the "for" syntax, it's not obvious that it will even compile without {stuff}, and it's also not obvious that an empty test condition will evaluate "true".
As for do..while, I just don't like reading a code block before I know the loop conditions.
...and goto is fine, but I just think you have to be careful with it.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
-
Infinite loop in C++
-
I use them both, but I try not to mix them.
I think that "for (;;)" looks cooler but it doesn't read as well as "while(1)" or "while(true)"
To understand why "while(true)" works, you only have to know the "while" syntax. I think even if you know the "for" syntax, it's not obvious that it will even compile without {stuff}, and it's also not obvious that an empty test condition will evaluate "true".
As for do..while, I just don't like reading a code block before I know the loop conditions.
@North very much agreed; I do accept do {} while (0) as a way to manage small “easy way out” block. Yes, it can be replaced with a goto.
-
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
"By comparison, at least, the way the Chinese government speaks about AI is more modest. Yes, China’s economic leadership views AI as a priority and has boldly claimed it seeks to lead the world by 2030. Yet the rhetoric lacks the eschatological tone common in Silicon Valley. Chinese economic planners appear more interested in AI as a tool for industrial processes than as a means of creating a superintelligence that will reach the singularity. The State Council’s 2025 “AI+” initiative is focused entirely on efficiency-enhancing applications rather than intelligence explosions.
There is another important difference. China is banking far more heavily on simpler, lower-cost open-source AI models. In the US, most of the leading “frontier” AI models are secret and proprietary, in part as a business model and in part due to the apocryphal fears that the wrong actors could trigger human extinction. The smaller, lower-cost Chinese models may be seeking, in that sense, to be the more nimble 1970s Toyota rivals to the giant American cars produced by General Motors.
More importantly, China is hedging its bets by investing heavily in a wide range of other technologies that might reasonably be described as “the future”. In 2024, the country invested an estimated $940bn in clean-energy capex, broadly defined as renewables, electricity grids and energy storage (batteries), dwarfing its AI investments. In these sectors, AI is meant to be a complement — the glue rather than the structure.
While China’s overall economy remains weaker than it was in the 2010s, elements of this broader strategy seem to be bearing fruit."
https://www.ft.com/content/12581344-6e37-45a0-a9d5-e3d6a9f8d9ba
-
@kepeken now you have two bad things
-
@evadm
Perchè ci sono degli spostati mentali che casualmente si trovano al governo di nazioni, con desideri imperialisti.Quindi so che sarebbe meglio costruire scuole e ospedali con i soldi delle armi, ma se poi vengono bombardati son soldi spesi male... Un aeroplanino in questo mondo è investimento necessario.
Come dire che sarebbe bello se potessimo spendere invece che stipendi per poliziotti, in insegnanti.
Ma della polizia c'è bisogno.
-
ho l'età per cui da femmina niente leva. Ma ho sempre ritenuto la leva come un posto infelice, inutile se non dannosa per alcuni. Io propongo come già fatto da altri in questo toot un periodo di servizio civile per tutti. Magari breve, tipo 6 mesi, lo troverei formativo e utile per lo sviluppo della persona e per la collettività. Non concordo con il "armati in nome della pace". I militari siano i professionisti che abbracciano questa carriera.
-
A13
<< ... [la sovranità digitale dell'Europa]
senza la capacità di lettura critica di intenzioni di sviluppo "globali"
lascia i "territori" impotenti di fronte al rischio di assistere al ripetersi di
errori di strategia
inevitabili in passato
che "oggi"
richiedono la consapevolezza di cosa non fu possibile iniziare a raggiungere
"allora"
[ricerca e mantenimento di autonomia digitale]
-
I miei ieri hanno fatto 51 anni di matrimonio. Secondo mia madre la base di questa riuscita e passare il tempo a far sentire in colpa mio padre. E mio padre ci casca da 50 anni e mezzo, Le do di bonus 6 mesi a mia madre ma sono ottimista. Visto il risultato chi sono io per contestare il metodo.
-
@DigiDavidex per associazione di idee, beccati questa:
(c'è nebbia anche in pianura)
-
@mariosiniscalchi perché si deve fare a gara su cosa sia più folle?
