Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Decided to try out #Bonfire

General Discussion
18 3 106

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • @benpate @maikel IMO, the "shipping stuff is hard", while true, isn't the issue. If you had created Emissary 8 years ago and stopped updating it after the first release (even with massive user feedback about UX and technical issues), your project would either be dead or massively forked (if there was enough interest). Even if you had a small release to fix a few serious bugs after eight years, that wouldn't be sufficient. If it weren't for Mastodon, AP would effectively be a dead protocol.

    read more

  • @maikel@vmst.io not surprising in the slightest considering ChatGPT is trained on public discourse, and most AP development discussions involve how much Mastodon fails at x y and z. Being the big fish means everybody takes pot shots at you.

    So it's just a reflection of the training data. Us.

    @benpate@mastodon.social you're just feeding the AI machine! 😱

    read more

  • @mat talk of purity can only make all other platforms connect better among themselves. Yet every time someone implements Activity Pub the first burden they find is "ooops, this gives an error from Mastodon side".

    Standards exist for this very reason.

    I agree with you with meeting in the middle, but Msatodon has been up since 2016, Activity Pub since 2018, we're on 2026. Mastodon migrated in late 2017 early 2018 before the spec was even fully ratified. It's been more than 8 years.

    If at-the-very-least it didn't have the "huge undocumented behaviours", it wouldn't be stalling all other AP implementers.

    @benpate

    read more

  • @benpate @maikel That doesn't sound right. Mastodon came first, ActivityPub came later. Surely that's enough of an explanation? AP was a retro-fit to an existing social media site. Of course it was a bodge job.

    To me, that's the true purpose of AP. It works best for connecting existing communities. We should reject the idea of tearing apart and rebuilding what exists today. Instead we should grow the network by meeting people where they are. Talk of "purity" can only be destructive.

    read more

  • @maikel I also wish Mastodon followed the specs closer.

    At the risk of sounding like an apologist, real-world constraints and deadlines were probably a factor. Shipping stuff is *hard* and there are always difficult tradeoffs to be made.

    C2S API is a good example. They NEEDED a mobile client, but the standard wasn’t enough.

    However we got here, it’s on the standards community to build a spec that will work in the real world, then make incentives for the market leader to follow.

    read more

  • JESUS when even the stochastic parrot throws shade at Msatodon implementation of Activity Pub.

    I'm honestly starting to wonder what is the point of people putting years in creating a standard if the main platform using such standard is spitting on it.

    read more

  • @vftdan

    Tor: here is a list https://fedilist.com/instance?q=&ip=&software=&registrations=&onion=only
    I2P: http://mastodon.i2p is currently online
    Yggdrasil: there was a few, but I can't find them now

    read more

  • Are there networks inside non-clearnet networks

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    5 Views
    Deployed @writefreely to https://notes.zef.pub can also be followed via @zef@notes.zef.pubAll content published with a fresh (prototype level) #SilverBullet library (as promised): https://github.com/zefhemel/silverbullet-libraries/blob/main/WriteFreely.md#selfhosted #activitypub
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    あのアカウントの人、#WordPress のプラグイン #ActivityPub の更新をしてないな…。たぶん。
  • 0 Votes
    31 Posts
    156 Views
    @oblomov non solo. Friendica (il mio software preferito, con uno staff di sviluppo fatto da persone eccezionali e non da figli di puttana) ha certamente avuto meno successo anche perché, mentre gli utenti ex Twitter (che erano mentalmente meno schiavi della piattaforma rispetto agli utenti di Facebook) hanno varcato la soglia trovando un'alternativa, gli ex utenti Facebook hanno preferito restare invece di cercare alternative.Ma Friendica ha avuto successo anche perché è fatta meno bene rispetto a Mastodon.Molto più potente di Mastodon, esattamente come un elicottero anfibio con i cingoli e il sonar è più potente di uno scooter. Ma se devi spostarti da casa al parco, lo scooter è meglio perché ha tutto ciò che ti serve.Lemmy ha altre limitazioni che forse verranno risolte con la release 1.0, ma anche lì, gli utenti Reddit italiani non hanno voglia di usarlo (già gli utenti anglofoni sono più interessati)Nel frattempo abbiamo creato anche citiverse.it un'istanza NodeBB con un progetto ambizioso che non abbiamo ancora avuto modo di coltivare nel modo giusto: creare un'alternativa ai gruppi Facebook. Certo, l'interfaccia è quella di un forum, ma ogni utente di ogni software può vederlo in modo diverso.Lo sviluppatore che è dietro NodeBB poi è un portento e ho grandi speranze in lui.Purtroppo, però devo aggiungere che non c'è stato un grande riscontro di pubblico: abbiamo creato citiverse.it per metterlo al servizio di tutto il fediverso italiano eppure sono pochi gli amministratori di istanza che ne hanno parlato con i loro utenti.Questo è un vero peccato e quando si parla di Fediverso, purtroppo, ci si concentra troppo sui numeri (meglio troppi? Meglio pochi?) o dei software (meglio minimale o meglio sontuoso? Gruppi sì, gruppi no? ) e ci si dimentica troppo spesso del fattore umano: c'è troppo poca condivisione, troppo poca felicità per i successi degli altri, in poche parole, troppo poca federazione@bbacc @Xabacadabra
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    The major feature in v3.2.0 of Ktistec is thread analysis. The previous release, v3.1.2, added support for viewing threads from Lemmy communities. I follow the Open Source community, which leads to many large threads. The thread on FFMpeg and Google has 112 posts and is still growing.Thread analysis helps me navigate these extensive conversations. It includes: top contributors, a timeline histogram, and notable branches.The analysis applies several heuristics to identify interesting branches of the main thread. “Interesting” is subjective, but the algorithm currently looks for sudden bursts of activity and highlights those areas. Ktistec uses this to create a table of contents that links directly to those branches. Clicking on one of these links takes you to a branch-only view that focuses on the selected part of the thread.It's fast—I anticipated needing to cache analyses, but analyzing a thread with over 400 posts takes only about 50 milliseconds on my production server.Figure 1: Screenshot of the final design. Notable branches link to subsets of the thread.This release also addresses an object visibility regression that was introduced in a previous version.Full ChangelogAddedThread analysis that displays key participants, a timeline histogram, and notable branchesNew MCP tools: analyze_thread and get_threadFocal point rendering support for image attachmentsFixedRegression in object visibility affecting replies to threadsChangedEnhanced MCP tool details for likes, dislikes, and announcesImproved cookie security.#ktistec #fediverse #activitypub #crystallang