I've mentioned briefly that I was to co-lead the ActivityPub API taskforce, however, I've come to the decision to step down from that and focus my energy elsewhere:'nhttps://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swicg/2025Oct/0013.html'n#ActivityPub
General Discussion
1
Post
1
Autori
0
Visualizzazioni
-
I've mentioned briefly that I was to co-lead the ActivityPub API taskforce, however, I've come to the decision to step down from that and focus my energy elsewhere:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swicg/2025Oct/0013.html
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Any time someone attempts this, they're run out of the building (literally/metaphorically)
-
#activitypub anyone know of any efforts to provide algorithm recommendations on Activity Pub? It could be a feed similar to #atproto, or it could users I might find interesting. As much as I like the people I come across here, superposters tend to drown out the chronological views
-
@tomjennings @scottjenson @stefan @evana
Tom, don't think that was what Scott was saying. This is a brainstorming session. As such, all aspects of the matter are being put on the table. The first step is to identify the problem in all it's complexities. It's a long way from making any kind of priority calls or implementation decisions. Feel like it is important to assume everyone has good intentions to constructively address the issue at this point.
-
@tomjennings @stefan @evana @mastodonmigration
Of course not. I'm just saying I open source software has these arguments all the time and we need to be respectful of others
-
So the needs or desires of that small group of people who's getting miffed has higher priority than people receiving harm and threats?
-
@stefan @evana @mastodonmigration These are indeed the harder questions to ask! I'm glad you're asking them
-
Just trying to imagine this playing out IRL. Someone pulls me to the side to talk to me, surrounds me with their buddies. Now, they might all be very nice people. But this situation just sounds inherently threatening.
-
@scottjenson It just sounds like we might need to turn the conversation around and instead of asking how to mitigate this feature's potential for abuse, a better question might be, why is this useful?
If to limit a posts visibility, maybe using "quiet public" is a better option?
