@doubletap We must remember the direction this world is taking. We should use AI tech for our benefit but in the same time we must fight for our privacy rights. AI can be biased, can give us information big tech (and governments) want us to have, I want to push it one step forward. A Fediverse-based service where humans help each other (photo/video description for example) and environment, and AI should be the last step when no one is available. (1/3)
As an HIV activist I want to propose this scenario. You perform a home test for HIV (oraquick or similar) and it turns out positive. A non-biased AI should just explain the facts. Test shows two lines. It means positive. At the most, "contact your local HIV and AIDS counselor". (2/3)
A trumpist, muskist, putinist or whoever authoritarian's biased AI would say: "it's positive. You have been exposed to high risk, in 2025 you should be aware HIV is 40 years old". Or worse. Or if it's negative, "next time use precautions"... Then the fact AI does not read adult contents... We should NEVER kneel down and be thankful/passive. Tech helps us, but let's empower ourselves to decide how, when, and what. (3/3)
Alla fine siamo andati alla mostra su 𝗔𝗹𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗘𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗲𝗱𝘁 a 𝘊𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘳𝘢 - 𝘊𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘰 𝘐𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘯𝘰 𝘱𝘦𝘳 𝘭𝘢 𝘍𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘧𝘪𝘢 perché oggi era l'ultimo giorno. Abbiamo ancora due settimane per visitare quella su Frida Kahlo e Marilyn Monroe all'Oratorio di San Filippo.
@doubletap We must remember the direction this world is taking. We should use AI tech for our benefit but in the same time we must fight for our privacy rights. AI can be biased, can give us information big tech (and governments) want us to have, I want to push it one step forward. A Fediverse-based service where humans help each other (photo/video description for example) and environment, and AI should be the last step when no one is available. (1/3)