There are currently about 12600 satellites in orbit.
Uncategorized
4
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
There are currently about 12600 satellites in orbit. As a result on average every day 3 fall out of space, dumping metals and other nasties into the upper atmosphere.
If we continue that rate of satellite loss, 1 in 4200, and extrapolate it to 1,000,000. That would be ~238 satellites PER DAY, falling out of the sky and spreading the materials they are made up of in the upper atmosphere. With some more substantial chunks hitting the surface, and possibly people.
That's just bonkers
1/n
-
There are currently about 12600 satellites in orbit. As a result on average every day 3 fall out of space, dumping metals and other nasties into the upper atmosphere.
If we continue that rate of satellite loss, 1 in 4200, and extrapolate it to 1,000,000. That would be ~238 satellites PER DAY, falling out of the sky and spreading the materials they are made up of in the upper atmosphere. With some more substantial chunks hitting the surface, and possibly people.
That's just bonkers
1/n
This of course completely overlooks all other practicalities of orbital datacentres, that makes putting high power computing in orbit. Which for a summary include: too much radiation noise making the systems unstable (see Wikipedia for "single even upset"), cooling when you have to dump heat into a vacuum, low data bandwidth (compared to a fibre on earth), latency, and shear fucking cost.
It's an absolutely fucking stupid idea. And I'm angry I have to spend my Sunday debunking this shit.
2/2
-
This of course completely overlooks all other practicalities of orbital datacentres, that makes putting high power computing in orbit. Which for a summary include: too much radiation noise making the systems unstable (see Wikipedia for "single even upset"), cooling when you have to dump heat into a vacuum, low data bandwidth (compared to a fibre on earth), latency, and shear fucking cost.
It's an absolutely fucking stupid idea. And I'm angry I have to spend my Sunday debunking this shit.
2/2
Postscript: and before the cult of space Karen start with the "so you're an expert in orbital computing this week are you?" Well. One of my first jobs out of uni involved designing an onboard control system for a satellite. My design has literally been to space. I know what I'm talking about on this one.
-
Postscript: and before the cult of space Karen start with the "so you're an expert in orbital computing this week are you?" Well. One of my first jobs out of uni involved designing an onboard control system for a satellite. My design has literally been to space. I know what I'm talking about on this one.
@quixoticgeek All I understood is that by 2050 we must start fracking in the upper atmosphere to extract the valuable metal oxides deposited there by the burned up satellites. /s
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@evan@cosocial.ca standard post-conference sharing of ideas followed by the vehement critique of said ideas by those who did not attend (and some who did 🙂)
-
-
@bean @glassbottommeg I suggest adding the "Musou" tag on Steam
-
L'utente esperto sta morendo. E a nessuno nel settore sembra importare. Anzi, la maggior parte di loro sta celebrando il funerale, pur spacciandolo per progresso
C'è un tipo di persona che sta svanendo: chi capiva davvero gli strumenti che usava e sapeva sedersi davanti a un sistema sconosciuto o lavorarci sopra per venti minuti e avere un modello mentale funzionante di cosa stesse facendo e perché. E che leggeva i messaggi di errore invece di ignorarli
https://fireborn.mataroa.blog/blog/the-slow-death-of-the-power-user/
-
@jamesoff not tiramisu, but I have some muffins for tomorrow 😉
-
@godber ha! I just have a lot of people arguing in my mentions -- mostly over my head, but with me still addressed. It's a pugilistic day on the Fediverse for some reason.
-
@glassbottommeg ohhhh store page! Congrats
-
@evan is Shaler here somewhere?
