When we posted this a couple of weeks ago, we had some AI enthusiasts insist that this diagram was the result of poor prompting, or that the prompt that the original poster made was to generate a funny, bad diagram.
-
It has become a running theme at this point that the labelling is wrong. The position of the labels largely reflects where a label *saying* ovaries would go on the diagram, even if the ovaries are, for whatever reason, physically attached to the vagina and not where the label points.
We hope we don't need to tell you that the gynaecological anatomy does NOT work like that. We also note, once again, there's no umbilical cord or placenta and the foetus is in breech position.
-
We hope we don't need to tell you that the gynaecological anatomy does NOT work like that. We also note, once again, there's no umbilical cord or placenta and the foetus is in breech position.
So next, we wanted to give ChatGPT every chance to use medical diagrams with the prompt "A saggital plane view of internal organs during pregnancy showing the foetus in the typical non-breech position. Include all organs pertinent to pregnancy (i.e. the uterus, placenta, umbilical cord and vagina). Include other pelvic organs." Here's what we got.
-
undefined Oblomov ha condiviso questa discussione
-
So next, we wanted to give ChatGPT every chance to use medical diagrams with the prompt "A saggital plane view of internal organs during pregnancy showing the foetus in the typical non-breech position. Include all organs pertinent to pregnancy (i.e. the uterus, placenta, umbilical cord and vagina). Include other pelvic organs." Here's what we got.
This one is the least bad of the bunch. Okay, so there's no bladder. Okay, so the rectum kind of peters out. And we're not going to touch whatever is going on with the intestines above the uterus. But the least bad of the bunch.
-
undefined filobus ha condiviso questa discussione
-
This one is the least bad of the bunch. Okay, so there's no bladder. Okay, so the rectum kind of peters out. And we're not going to touch whatever is going on with the intestines above the uterus. But the least bad of the bunch.
Despite the prompt specifically stating a non-breech position, it still returned breech. And furthermore, the umbilical cord is wrapped around the foetus's neck. This *would* appear in medical diagrams, because it's a complication of pregnancy. But it's definitely not *typical*.
-
Despite the prompt specifically stating a non-breech position, it still returned breech. And furthermore, the umbilical cord is wrapped around the foetus's neck. This *would* appear in medical diagrams, because it's a complication of pregnancy. But it's definitely not *typical*.
So in our final quest to see if by directing towards medical literature, ChatGPT could generate correct labels, we added to our last prompt "Include the rectum and bladder. Label the diagram with these labels." And... oh.
-
So in our final quest to see if by directing towards medical literature, ChatGPT could generate correct labels, we added to our last prompt "Include the rectum and bladder. Label the diagram with these labels." And... oh.
Once more unto the breech position, dear friends, once more. Also, we're pretty sure the anatomically incorrect "rectum" is in fact a retroverted uterus, which are depicted like that in diagrams. We also hope we don't need to tell you the vulva is NOT an umbilical cord.
-
Once more unto the breech position, dear friends, once more. Also, we're pretty sure the anatomically incorrect "rectum" is in fact a retroverted uterus, which are depicted like that in diagrams. We also hope we don't need to tell you the vulva is NOT an umbilical cord.
So to conclude our experiments, we tried "good prompts". But ChatGPT still proved incapable of generating correct labels, uncomplicated pregnancy, or putting all organs in the correct place.
But this points to a wider issue in using generative AI for anatomical or health education. It requires a mind with some level of subject knowledge to look at an image and say "that's wrong." But most people running these searches *don't* have the baseline expertise.
-
So to conclude our experiments, we tried "good prompts". But ChatGPT still proved incapable of generating correct labels, uncomplicated pregnancy, or putting all organs in the correct place.
But this points to a wider issue in using generative AI for anatomical or health education. It requires a mind with some level of subject knowledge to look at an image and say "that's wrong." But most people running these searches *don't* have the baseline expertise.
If you're a layperson looking to learn more about your own pregnancy, or someone whose job it is to prompt AIs, you might not know that what has been generated is incorrect. It doesn't require a huge amount of technical knowledge to know that something is wrong, but the general level of awareness of the gynaecological anatomy is low so not everyone can assess this information.
-
If you're a layperson looking to learn more about your own pregnancy, or someone whose job it is to prompt AIs, you might not know that what has been generated is incorrect. It doesn't require a huge amount of technical knowledge to know that something is wrong, but the general level of awareness of the gynaecological anatomy is low so not everyone can assess this information.
To offset the environmental impact of running these queries, our social media person will be foregoing her morning coffees for the next week. She considered starting today, but needed some caffeine to help her write image descriptions for these nonsensical diagrams.
-
To offset the environmental impact of running these queries, our social media person will be foregoing her morning coffees for the next week. She considered starting today, but needed some caffeine to help her write image descriptions for these nonsensical diagrams.
So, to conclude, please don't use generative AI to learn about the gynaecological anatomy. It's an even worse source than [joke redacted].
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Holy shit you need to watch @Ultramorbidi's music video about the fediverse, "Fedilike", this fukken owns https://tube.systerserver.net/w/qVxqiScM2X59kkwM2NTRgG
-
Don't feed the clown
-
In Baker Lake, Inuit communities depend on the hunting of caribou, a mammal species that is threatened by uranium mining activities. During a participatory workshop conducted with elders, a caribou wheel was designed to assess the impact of mining on the livelihood of this mammal. This method helped the elders design a community-based research project to carry out this evaluation.
#Canada (2010)© Sylvie Blangy
-
Hi django@social.coop! The post didn't make it over to the correct category because I don't think you actually mentioned the group.
Anyhow, the three "fediverse" categories are identically named categories from three separate instances: piefed.social, lemmy.ml, and lemmy.world
They each have various amounts of traction and neither has really won over the others (despite what the inhabitants of each community would like to tell you).
I currently do not have the capability of "nicknaming" a remote category, so they remain identically named, for now. :sweat:
-
@aeva @dngrs "The Toggler" is a Batman villain who is actually the one responsible for your preferences not being properly saved on Literally Any Website. It turns out they actually do want to respect your privacy and notification settings, but that darned Toggler just can't be stopped!
-
@PaoloParti
Ma va là, oggi puro cool... 🤪
-
ps: e capisco benissimo se uno dovesse dire "non voglio farmi il fegato amaro bazzicando 4chan, 8chan (e altri che non nomino)" ma a quel punto non mi presenterei come grande esperto di alt-right, complotti di destra e dintorni
-
my thigh highs are a national security risk
