Hello people interested in a decentralised Fediverse, would like some feedback on something 🙏

[fedigarden@social.growyourown.services]

Hello people interested in a decentralised Fediverse, would like some feedback on something 🙏

At the moment, Fedi.Garden only lists Fediverse servers with fewer than 50,000 registered members. I am wondering if this limit should be replaced by a limit based on active members rather than registered members?

If a server has had a lot of signups in the past but not many active now, it is perhaps unfairly shut out of Fedi.Garden even though it now needs help getting noticed?

Any thoughts?

[fedigarden@social.growyourown.services]

p.s. This came to mind due to the supergiant mastodon.social which is sucking up all the active members at an unprecedented rate.

Even servers considered large now only have a tiny fraction of the active members of mastodon.social. It's getting really dangerous for decentralisation.

[paulatothepeople@climatejustice.social]

@FediGarden Servers with too many active members are the problem for mods all over the Fediverse, so yeah, I'd say active members makes more sense as a limit. 2000 active members is enough.