Is there a known AP implementation that supports multiple quoted posts per Note or Article implementing quoteUrl or the likes
-
Is there a known AP implementation that supports multiple quoted posts per
Note
orArticle
implementingquoteUrl
or the likes?
CC: @silverpill -
Is there a known AP implementation that supports multiple quoted posts per
Note
orArticle
implementingquoteUrl
or the likes?
CC: @silverpill@mario Mitra supports multiple quotes. For every quote, a FEP-e232 tag is added, but there is always only one
quoteUrl
(this comment will have two quotes)
https://mastodon.social/users/Edent/statuses/115310022243443794
https://iosdev.space/users/tootsdk/statuses/115310093224755863
-
@mario Mitra supports multiple quotes. For every quote, a FEP-e232 tag is added, but there is always only one
quoteUrl
(this comment will have two quotes)
https://mastodon.social/users/Edent/statuses/115310022243443794
https://iosdev.space/users/tootsdk/statuses/115310093224755863
@silverpill is there a specific reason not to use an array of URLs forquoteUrl
? -
@silverpill is there a specific reason not to use an array of URLs for
quoteUrl
?@mario I suspect that no software would understand that.
-
@mario I suspect that no software would understand that.
Just did a quick test: mastodon will pick the first, pleroma will choke if receiving an array of URLs.
@silverpill @Phantasm @Helge -
Just did a quick test: mastodon will pick the first, pleroma will choke if receiving an array of URLs.
@silverpill @Phantasm @Helge@mario Mitra will also choke on an array of URLs. I think the value of this property is supposed to be a string.
(btw, your comment contains additional mentions but these actors are not included in
tag
orto
) -
@mario Mitra will also choke on an array of URLs. I think the value of this property is supposed to be a string.
(btw, your comment contains additional mentions but these actors are not included in
tag
orto
)@silverpill(btw, your comment contains additional mentions but these actors are not included in tag or to)
This is some sort of edge case. They are not among my connections and i had to manually approve their comments.
It is probably correct to not include them into
since this is a contained conversation and it is not allowed to change the audience scope. Not sure abouttag
. But if they are not supposed to get the message... Anyway, this restrictions probably do not make sense for public posts