Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
-
Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
* enable developer options
* confirm that you are not tricked
* restart phone and re-authenticate
* wait one day
* confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
* decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
* confirm that you accept the risks
* enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with this@grote Can we please use this flow for enabling macros in MS Office?
-
It's also a crying shame. ARM Macs have incredible battery life. If they weren't rendered largely useless by the aforementioned OS installation restrictions, they'd probably be my favorite kind of laptop.
@argv_minus_one I'm strongly against using ARM for desktops, but I'll be first in line to agree that they are good for laptops and other portable devices.
It is a shame it isn't used more. There is literally no reason this has to be specific to Apple.
I think a lot of people forget that laptops shouldn't be behemoths built to do 1/3rd to 1/2 of what a desktop can do at 2-3x the cost tied down to a desk running super hot and loud with a keyboard, mouse, and monitor plugged in. (Seriously, why do people do this???) They should be small, light, and efficient because they're meant to be portable.
But they also shouldn't be locked down walled gardens (see Chromebook crap.)
I did see a neat little open laptop thing on my feed, but it seems to be not available yet?
-
@CalcProgrammer1 @itsFriday @grote
And it's not even about malware. Plenty in the Playstore. It's about Google deciding they are in control of your phone. You only rented it.@raymaccarthy @CalcProgrammer1 @grote Yes. That is why I think the 24h is the only reasonable part.
-
@Epic_Null @FifiSch @grote What?
I'm saying if you for some reason yanked out the cable or something and broke the initial flash you can press up and press enter then this time not yank out the cable.
@nazokiyoubinbou @FifiSch @grote You said you don't understand why the process of installing a new OS on your phone is so scary for the average user? I was responding to that part - it's scary because if you fuck it up, the only way through it is to not fuck it up.
-
Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
* enable developer options
* confirm that you are not tricked
* restart phone and re-authenticate
* wait one day
* confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
* decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
* confirm that you accept the risks
* enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with this@grote Unnecessary steps to install apps on Android outside Play Store
-
Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
* enable developer options
* confirm that you are not tricked
* restart phone and re-authenticate
* wait one day
* confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
* decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
* confirm that you accept the risks
* enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with this@grote please don't call installing software sideloading... We should refuse to use that term.
-
-
@nazokiyoubinbou @FifiSch @grote You said you don't understand why the process of installing a new OS on your phone is so scary for the average user? I was responding to that part - it's scary because if you fuck it up, the only way through it is to not fuck it up.
@Epic_Null @FifiSch @grote And I'm saying it's not scary if you mess it up is because you can just simply try again and not do something really stupid like yanking out the cable the second time.
I'm also saying most have dual partition layouts where if you do screw up the second one you can go back to booting the first.
Also, there's nothing wrong with the old tried and true "just ask someone who knows this stuff" like people used to do back in the day. I don't know why everyone decided that they had to just buy stuff certain ways and if it wasn't right toss it and buy a new thing rather than just asking someone who knows the thing like everyone used to do...
-
@Li @CalcProgrammer1 @grote It could be skipped on the very first startup with a question: "Would you like to do some settings for advanced user? Please only click 'yes' if you informed yourselve extensive beforehand."
@itsFriday @CalcProgrammer1 @grote that implies that "installing an application" and not requiring a license from the state + google to do so .. is a "feature for advanced users" which it isnt.
-
@grote I guess anyone willing to jump through all those hoops has already installed Graphene or Lineage or whatever.
-
The user needs to know what an OS even is and that they're using one.
No... Not really. "Install LineageOS" or whatever is all they need to know.
The user needs to realize that they can use a different OS.
That's the second part of the first problem repeated. Again when people say "just install LineageOS" they know they need to install a different thing.
Third problem
Oh we do agree on parts of that and that is a huge part of what I'm saying is NOT ok in this ecosystem. It's not to the extent that you say of course, but it still applies a lot.
I get it. You're terrified of something different and really really don't even want it to be a thing. But that doesn't mean it's ok to be 100% behind letting Google and Apple do this.
@nazokiyoubinbou @FifiSch @grote
> "Install LineageOS"
Oh, is that an app or something? Can i download it from the Play Store?You're naive. I'm not saying it's okay for Google and Apple to do whatever they're doing. I'm just saying that the whole process to switch OS is hard and claiming otherwise isn't helping anybody. Also, the thing is, users shouldn't be forced to switch OS just to install an app they want. The same way they shouldn't be forced to self-host a whole-ass cloud stack just to keep their privacy (see https://neilzone.co.uk/2022/07/self-host-it-is-not-the-answer/). It simply isn't a viable solution for regular users. There should be much stricter regulations in place to prevent these kinds of things in the first place.
-
@31113 @terminaltilt
Cops and goons can take your phone and hold it up to your face very easily. Thankfully it’s pretty easy to disable face for unlock, but continue to use it for everything else.@shivvr but how often does that happen to you vs how often do you unlock your phone in the presence of other people or cameras who could see what you're typing?
-
@tedmielczarek @grote I'm thinking of a small company with a dozen or so developers who have one Android app that talks to their back end, for use by a few dozen installation crews. Anything with "enterprise" in its name would be *vastly* too expensive to be of any use to a company like that.
@TimWardCam @grote I feel like you're inventing a weird fictional scenario here to be mad about, but Google Play already has support for limited distribution of apps for internal testing without requiring all of the steps required to publish an app in the Play Store: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/9845334?hl=en
-
Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
* enable developer options
* confirm that you are not tricked
* restart phone and re-authenticate
* wait one day
* confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
* decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
* confirm that you accept the risks
* enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with this@grote@chaos.social okay, i need to ask this since i can't quite seem to find info anywhere
what would happen to the sideloading permission if developer options was disabled?
if sideloading also gets disabled as a result, i presume re-enabling it would require repeating the steps outlined, yes?
if that would be the case, it would still be borderline useless on any daily-use phone, since a considerable number of apps (notably ones to do with Money) would actively refuse to start with developer options enabled
conflating having "unapproved" software installed with having access to more direct system settings is kinda Not Great tbh
and just because it isn't directly approved doesn't immediately mean it's malicious, either (said detection/blocking would also effectively conflate the two) -
Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
* enable developer options
* confirm that you are not tricked
* restart phone and re-authenticate
* wait one day
* confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
* decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
* confirm that you accept the risks
* enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with thisJust one step:
Make your own mobile OS. -
Google has news on what you will need to do for still being able to sideload apps:
* enable developer options
* confirm that you are not tricked
* restart phone and re-authenticate
* wait one day
* confirm with biometrics that you know what you are doing
* decide if you only want unrestricted installs for 1 week or forever
* confirm that you accept the risks
* enjoy the few apps that still have developers motivated to develop for a user-base willing to put up with this@grote you and google are underestimating the lengths I'll go to avoid googles bullshit.
Would be great if I had a money so I could buy a Jolla.
-
"scammers often pressure victims into disabling security measures"
gee Google, i wonder where they might find malware that would bypass those "security measures" without any pressure at all??? oh well not fucking important i guess.
@burnitdown @grote I'd be willing to bet most are from AdSense ads
-
@argv_minus_one I'm strongly against using ARM for desktops, but I'll be first in line to agree that they are good for laptops and other portable devices.
It is a shame it isn't used more. There is literally no reason this has to be specific to Apple.
I think a lot of people forget that laptops shouldn't be behemoths built to do 1/3rd to 1/2 of what a desktop can do at 2-3x the cost tied down to a desk running super hot and loud with a keyboard, mouse, and monitor plugged in. (Seriously, why do people do this???) They should be small, light, and efficient because they're meant to be portable.
But they also shouldn't be locked down walled gardens (see Chromebook crap.)
I did see a neat little open laptop thing on my feed, but it seems to be not available yet?
I'm hoping we get RISC-V desktops/laptops instead, since it's an open standard.
The manufacturer of one RISC-V laptop, the DC-ROMA II, claims it has an 8-hour battery life. If that's true then it's definitely competitive with Apple in that regard.
The CPU's clock speed is only 2GHz, though, so unless it has very high instructions-per-clock compared to Apple Silicon, it's going to be quite slow.
-
@Epic_Null @FifiSch @grote And I'm saying it's not scary if you mess it up is because you can just simply try again and not do something really stupid like yanking out the cable the second time.
I'm also saying most have dual partition layouts where if you do screw up the second one you can go back to booting the first.
Also, there's nothing wrong with the old tried and true "just ask someone who knows this stuff" like people used to do back in the day. I don't know why everyone decided that they had to just buy stuff certain ways and if it wasn't right toss it and buy a new thing rather than just asking someone who knows the thing like everyone used to do...
@nazokiyoubinbou @FifiSch @grote and my response is that's only comforting to those who are already confident in their ability to complete the task at hand. If this is your first time, you have no clue what "something really stupid" looks like, or what happens when that occurs.
-
@grote 24 hours of not owning my phone is evil. This is stupid. I'm fine with everything but the pointless 24 hour wait and the biometric requirement. Give us your personally identifiable information and wait in phone purgatory for 24 hours to actually be able to own your device? Ridiculous.
@CalcProgrammer1 @grote Google is evil. It should have been clear after they change from their "don't be evil" motto.
Not sure what the thing is with PIN or biometrics. Are biometrics now required?
Anyway, if they are not evil, they should allow "sideloading enable" while doing full wipe.