Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

It is not too late to register your Trumpet Winsock.

Uncategorized
41 23 0

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    I should post about the latest #retrocomputing project I started.Problem: I'd like an open-source, self-hosting C compiler on 8086, that supports the large memory model, overlays, and enough C89 to build Lua.This seems to not exist! K&R is much more common in this size category. Around the time of C89, many compilers bloated to the point of requiring a 386 or better host, though they could still target 8086. The 8086 holdouts were, in general, commercial products that never got a source release.One notable exception was DeSmet C http://www.desmet-c.com. It seems to have started life as a commercial PC fork of Bell Labs PCC, a small and sturdy K&R compiler. DeSmet 3.1 added "draft ANSI C" support, but this is incomplete, and riddled with code-gen bugs. This version later found itself on Github as OpenDC https://github.com/the-grue/OpenDC.Aside from all the bugs, this is a pretty cool package: its dis/assembler, debugger, text editor, and some other utilities were also open sourced, and it runs on an 8088 with 256K RAM and two 360K floppies.The OpenDC person did a good job packaging things up into an easily buildable form, and fixing syntax errors that probably came from running the sources through a different compiler version than expected, so... yes, it does indeed build and self-host... and I've done this on my Book 8088.So now I will try to fix the bugs and add the missing C89 features. There are many, many of both... gulp.
  • Hello programmer types,

    Uncategorized retrocomputing programming dev
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    3 Views
    @prokyonid I'm in roughly the same place, and I've found the 6502/6510, specifically the Commodore 64, has the most/best learning resources and tools, by far. And, its small size and consistency (you'll never have to learn about different video or sound cards, every 64 has a VIC-II and a SID) means a human can reasonably learn and reason about the whole machine.I'll try my hand at other CPUs, eventually, but for now the 64 is the right balance of simplicity and well-documented.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    14 Views
    @c64whiz You're so close to AGI.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    12 Views
    「 Solaris 2.1 for x86, also known as SunOS 5.1, was Sun’s first entry into the PC market (technically it was SunSoft, a subsidiary of Sun Microsystems, who released Solaris). However, it wasn’t Sun’s first x86 operating system. In the late 1980s, Sun sold 386i workstations based on Intel 386 processors. The 386i workstations were not PC compatible and ran SunOS 4.0, a BSD UNIX derivative with many custom Sun enhancements 」https://www.os2museum.com/wp/pc-unix-history/solaris-2-1-for-x86/#solaris #unix #retrocomputing