@lxo @oblomov @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

right, because i'm calling you names. not like you're calling me names because you don't like what i'm telling you. of course. got it

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

again, if you don't like the implications of what you say, that's not my problem, and pointing that out is not name calling.

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

oblomov: whatever you need to cope in this world, go for it. we all have frustrations. if you need to think i'm terrible things because you reject what i say about the topic, that has nothing to do with your smears, do what you have to do. i understand it's difficult for you

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

LOL

Nice try, but again, projecting won't help.

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

do you understand what projection is?

good god man

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

Better than you, apparently.

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

and we've arrived at the deeply intellectual and emotionally mature "no, u" "no, u" "no, u" stage of the farce thread

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

mostly I'm noticing that you seem to be in a pissing contest with trying to drop the last word in, because I can't explain to myself why you keep responding when you have nothing more of relevant to say.

(Cue useless response in 3 … 2 … 1)

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

useless response:

oblomov, something like 20 comments ago i stopped taking anything here seriously and decided to just have some fun with two don quixote type characters tilting at windmills who don't even understand open source is

and i sincerely thank you for the entertainment

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

Theeere you go. I'm glad you're happy.

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

i am

are you enjoying interacting with a projecting, libertarian moron, google goon, immoral drunk driver defender?

what else you got for me

🍿

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

I'm procrastinating doing a boring task.

You should probably purge the reply list because I doubt anyone else is interested in the banter.

https://sociale.network/@oblomov/116158970043455571

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

oblomov you've sent me a number of links. i haven't clicked a single one of them

the purpose of a shitposting thread is the interaction, not academic citations

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

https://sociale.network/@oblomov/116158970043455571

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@oblomov @lxo @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

ahhh. mmm. wow. yes. ahhh

[oblomov@sociale.network]

@benroyce

https://sociale.network/@oblomov/116158970043455571

[lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br]

mastodon implemented AP, which brought new features

then it worked with both protocols for a while, and benefited from the interop

then it removed OStatus, which was a jerk move that didn't bring any features whatsoever

CC: @oblomov@sociale.network @Jirikiha@raphus.social @macacator@mastodon.social @MyWoolyMastadon@toot.community @john@vyrse.social @engel@mastodon.social @everton137@vivaldi.net

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@lxo @oblomov @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

how do you implement a new protocol with new features, and it also supports an old protocol without those features

you don't. not because of vast unfathomable evil. but because it is just practically impossible

come on man

[lxo@snac.lx.oliva.nom.br]

it's so impossible that it happened. go figure!

mastodon had a full implementation of AP in release 1.6. then it dropped OStatus in release 3.0.

and it's not even the only case of multi protocol support. friendica and hubzilla implement multiple different protocols. so does dovecot (imap, pop, and more). oh, look, browsers also support multiple protocols: http, https, ftp, ... Emacs ange-ftp supports all of these plus ssh and rsync and more. http servers typically support multiple versions of http, and openssh has supported multiple versions of the ssh protocol.

they don't go about making up problems that don't exist, and inventing impossibilities that aren't there.

it takes a lot of wrong assumptions to conclude it can't be done to defend the indefensible.

CC: @oblomov@sociale.network @Jirikiha@raphus.social @macacator@mastodon.social @MyWoolyMastadon@toot.community @john@vyrse.social @engel@mastodon.social @everton137@vivaldi.net

[benroyce@mastodon.social]

@lxo @oblomov @Jirikiha @macacator @MyWoolyMastadon @john @engel @everton137

alexandre:

activitypub does restricted-audience messages

ostatus does public, broadcast-style messages

you can't use ostatus with mastodon

it's simply impossible

you've lost credibility on this topic in my eyes

you just seem to be arguing stubbornly rather than admitting fault when you must to be considered seriously

it's perfectly fine to admit fault

i screw up all the time

and then i admit it

you can too