Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Nessuna skin)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. General Discussion
  4. Is it OK to write code that does new things on the Fediverse?

Is it OK to write code that does new things on the Fediverse?

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato General Discussion
evanpollpollactivitypubfediverse
1 Post multipli 54 Post 22 Autori 25 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • evan@cosocial.ca evan@cosocial.ca

    Is it OK to write code that does new things on the Fediverse?

    #EvanPoll #poll #ActivityPub #Fediverse

    bkardell@toot.cafe
    bkardell@toot.cafe
    bkardell@toot.cafe
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #41

    @evan new things like what?

    evan@cosocial.ca 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • evan@cosocial.ca evan@cosocial.ca

      Anyway, my answer is yes. It's OK for people to make code that does new things on the Fediverse.

      linamahmoud@mastodon.social
      linamahmoud@mastodon.social
      linamahmoud@mastodon.social
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #42

      @evan 💔🙏

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • evan@cosocial.ca evan@cosocial.ca

        Thanks all. I see a lot of developers getting brigaded for launching new tools on the Fediverse. At best, they're insulted and their motives are questioned. At worst, they're brigaded on GitHub, the Fediverse, or in real life.

        fancysandwiches@neuromatch.social
        fancysandwiches@neuromatch.social
        fancysandwiches@neuromatch.social
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #43

        @evan in the same way that people won't opt in to services that use their data to do things they don't care about, the developers making these services won't listen unless they are told forcefully that their presence is not welcome. I have the world's smallest violin for the people getting brigaded when they act like assholes. There are plenty of developers on Fedi doing new things and not getting brigaded. For example, I don't recall the GoToSocial devs getting brigaded for adding additional reply controls to their project, but they also weren't acting like jerks so I wouldn't expect them to be brigraded.

        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        0
        • kleisli@mastodon.social
          kleisli@mastodon.social
          kleisli@mastodon.social
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #44

          @dalias if a post is public, indexable and shareable, I think all this is explicitly allowed by the protocol.
          Usage for AI training is not, but we all know it inevitably happens when any content is publicly available. @evan

          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0
          • bkardell@toot.cafe bkardell@toot.cafe

            @evan new things like what?

            evan@cosocial.ca
            evan@cosocial.ca
            evan@cosocial.ca
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #45

            @bkardell If I knew what the new things were, they wouldn't be new.

            1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            0
            • smallcircles@social.coop
              smallcircles@social.coop
              smallcircles@social.coop
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #46

              @spraoi @gumnos @evan

              I feel the hidden question of the #poll is: Given the #technology base exists, can you just code against it at will? I.e. the tech #ethics question is asked. Where on one end of the spectrum we find the techbro / fossbro, and on the other end of the spectrum we are still learning what we should have there as an alternative to make a social web be social and keep it that way. As "social web" technology by itself offers zero guarantee of that.

              #SX #SocialWeb #ActivityPub

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              0
              • kleisli@mastodon.social
                kleisli@mastodon.social
                kleisli@mastodon.social
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #47

                @dalias so you think I am not explicitly allowed to link to a post when it is public? Or store it to be findable when it is declared as indexable? @evan

                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                0
                • lispi314@udongein.xyz
                  lispi314@udongein.xyz
                  lispi314@udongein.xyz
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #48
                  @dalias > Traditionally in Japan that was NOT ok at least socially.

                  Were Japan just weirdly early on search engines and never had web directories or was something else going on?
                  1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  0
                  • lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
                    lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
                    lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #49
                    @dalias @kleisli @evan Also depending on what it's for, it can be illegal in EU. Like if it reveals personal data, with personal != private, or it's defaming in the style of a blocklist.
                    For example shared twitter blocklists targetting personal accounts have caused trouble.
                    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    0
                    • evan@cosocial.ca evan@cosocial.ca

                      @gabboman so, maybe the person making a social web crawler is just as well-intentioned as the person making the no-mention private messages?

                      jdp23@neuromatch.social
                      jdp23@neuromatch.social
                      jdp23@neuromatch.social
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #50

                      Sometimes. I know of a couple cases where once it was pointed out that somebody had violated longstanding norms here (or as @gabboman says, the "spiirt of the social contract of fedi") , they immediately apologized and took down the data they had scraped. And guess what? Those cases didn't lead to blow ups.

                      But in the cases I'm aware of where it did blow up, they the either said something that made it clear that they had intentionally not designing for informed, affirmative consent ... or made an intentional choice to ignore (or pushed back on) the initial feedback.

                      These repeated firestorms really are an unfortunate pattern but as I've said for quite a while it's going to keep happening until fedi influencers with big megaphones change their behavior.

                      • start repeatedly emphasizing that consent and resistance to surveillance capitalism are very important norms here.

                      • share and model best practices for how to avoid unintentionally violating norms -- including asking before releasing something (because it's not always obvious what will set off a firestorm) and listening to the feedback rather than dismissing it

                      It's frustrating because it's been over two years since I wrote https://thenexusofprivacy.net/consent-for-fediverse-developers/ and @deadsuperhero did a remix of it on We Distribute at https://wedistribute.org/2024/07/fediverse-privacy-and-consent/ In fact I think you might have even been at a #FediForum session (probably in 2024) where we discussed this! And yet, there really doesn't seem to be much interest from high-profile developers in getting the word out about this.

                      @evan

                      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      0
                      • smallcircles@social.coop
                        smallcircles@social.coop
                        smallcircles@social.coop
                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                        #51

                        @spraoi @gumnos @evan

                        It is not a favorite term of mine too. I usually do not use it. But it is a term that is being used. Guess its explanation is similar to techbro "I can create all the tech I want", and not dealing with / caring for externalities.

                        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                        0
                        • hyblon@social.vivaldi.net
                          hyblon@social.vivaldi.net
                          hyblon@social.vivaldi.net
                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                          #52

                          @spraoi @smallcircles @gumnos @evan

                          These days (I hate to say “these days”, but I need to use it now), it seems to be fashionable to add “bro” to every group considered “harmful.” It often takes a particular demographic stereotype, usually white, straight men, who show a strong passion for a particular interest, and turns them into a caricature onto which a whole set of negative traits can be projected.

                          smallcircles@social.coop 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                          0
                          • hyblon@social.vivaldi.net hyblon@social.vivaldi.net

                            @spraoi @smallcircles @gumnos @evan

                            These days (I hate to say “these days”, but I need to use it now), it seems to be fashionable to add “bro” to every group considered “harmful.” It often takes a particular demographic stereotype, usually white, straight men, who show a strong passion for a particular interest, and turns them into a caricature onto which a whole set of negative traits can be projected.

                            smallcircles@social.coop
                            smallcircles@social.coop
                            smallcircles@social.coop
                            scritto su ultima modifica di
                            #53

                            @hyblon @spraoi @gumnos @evan

                            True, though I think initially the words built on a genuine observed diversity or lack thereof, for gender choice. Where the "techbro" refered to a stereotypical tech solutionist, Silicon Valley mindset. Then extended to FOSSbro to refer similar mindset in different context.

                            But today the words are deliberately used, in online fights, in the way you say.

                            In the past I suggested using alternatives for similar often used gendered terminology, just because a simple rename would lead to a friendlier online environment. Like rename "reply guy" to "reply sigh", and "mansplaining" to "oversplaining".

                            hyblon@social.vivaldi.net 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                            0
                            • smallcircles@social.coop smallcircles@social.coop

                              @hyblon @spraoi @gumnos @evan

                              True, though I think initially the words built on a genuine observed diversity or lack thereof, for gender choice. Where the "techbro" refered to a stereotypical tech solutionist, Silicon Valley mindset. Then extended to FOSSbro to refer similar mindset in different context.

                              But today the words are deliberately used, in online fights, in the way you say.

                              In the past I suggested using alternatives for similar often used gendered terminology, just because a simple rename would lead to a friendlier online environment. Like rename "reply guy" to "reply sigh", and "mansplaining" to "oversplaining".

                              hyblon@social.vivaldi.net
                              hyblon@social.vivaldi.net
                              hyblon@social.vivaldi.net
                              scritto su ultima modifica di
                              #54

                              @smallcircles @spraoi @gumnos @evan

                              Before we started internalizing the jargon from across the pond, we Italians had a habit of simply calling someone a “testa di cazzo,” roughly “dickhead.” It was neutral and inclusive: it could apply to anyone. We didn't need words like fascist, racist, homophobe, antivaxxer, Russian troll, or whatever else is trendy. Someone could simply be a dickhead. Nothing less, nothing more.

                              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                              0

                              Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

                              Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

                              Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

                              Registrati Accedi
                              Rispondi
                              • Risposta alla discussione
                              Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                              • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                              • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                              • Più Voti


                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 3
                              Feed RSS
                              Is it OK to write code that does new things on the Fediverse?
                              @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                              NodeBB Contributors
                              • Accedi

                              • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                              • Primo post
                                Ultimo post