So You Want To Write An Open Source Discord Replacement

[catsalad@infosec.exchange]

@0xabad1dea Also needed:

- a cat mascot!

[realn2s@infosec.exchange]

@ljrk @katarjin.bsky.social @0xabad1dea
I'm with you. I didn't/don't get Slack, Discord, Matrix (and neither IRC). I understand group chats but as soon as they get busy I'm completely overwhelmed and feel left alone by the tools

[maswan@mastodon.acc.sunet.se]

@catsalad @0xabad1dea catcatchat!

[isotopp@infosec.exchange]

@enejjohhem @0xabad1dea

A system with end-to-end encryption has no access to message content on the server because that is literally the definition of E2E encryption.

That means you will never have access to past content – you weren't in the receiver list of a channel when the message was sent, and you won't retroactively get it, because the server cannot add you. You are essentially joining an empty channel or even server.

That also means that the server cannot look into message content, for example to identify and autoban spammers, work on message moderation or otherwise do what anybody would reasonably expect a server to do in terms of safety and abuse control.

It also means that the server cannot provide you with a meaningful server based search at all. Instead the client has to download the content it has keys for and then search locally. That won't happen except on desktop devices, and even there it won't work well.

You could add a server machine user to every message so that search and automoderation would have access to message content. But that means effectively you don't have, and don't need end, and don't want to end-to-end encryption.

Which you don't.

It's not a cool feature, for anybody except the most limited set of users, and these will still hate every second of the experience they are forced to have by their circumstances.

[shelldozer@oldbytes.space]

@gabboman @0xabad1dea Agreed, although a resilient pile of non-working turds is not going to cut it.

[shelldozer@oldbytes.space]

@ratsnakegames @0xabad1dea You mean the same WhatsApp that is wholly-owned by Meta?

[catsalad@infosec.exchange]

@maswan @0xabad1dea Two cats and a French cat? Heck yeah!

[ratsnakegames@mastodon.social]

@0xabad1dea @shelldozer that does not deter people from using it en masse.

[ratsnakegames@mastodon.social]

@0xabad1dea @shelldozer also, no, i mean the Whatsapp that is co-owned by Walmart, the Italian Mafia, and Migros. Duh.

[nojhan@social.antigene.org]

@0xabad1dea

For those of you coming to see if that exists, I checked https://mattermost,com and:
✅ a user interface that is Normal
✅ the ability to use languages other than English and writing systems other than Latin
✅ higher standards of user experience than how irc actually works in the real world
✅ any fucking clue how Discord works and why people use it

I guess I'll see you there.

[martin@social.mdosch.de]

@0xabad1dea@infosec.exchange
Am not a discord user myself but I hear #movim is taking steps to become an alternative. Maybe worth to check that out, no recent experince with discord or movim from my side though.

[jenesuispasgoth@pouet.chapril.org]

@gkrnours @0xabad1dea technically they also have a chat system (Tchap), which is nowhere near as advanced as what discord/slack offer.

[randomdamage@infosec.exchange]

@nojhan @0xabad1dea considering where we are and who you're replying to, maybe the source repo would be a better place to direct people?

(It's on github, but things could be worse)