Bases.
Uncategorized
48
Posts
29
Posters
1
Views
-
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird I'd use emoji to introduce the concept. For extra fun, have each emoji relate to the number.
Example: I have a new way of counting. It uses 🍩, 👁️, and 🧦.
(doughnut/circle/zero, eye/i/one, pair/two) -
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird there are only 10 numer keys on the keyboard... Imagine of there were more or fewer. Also consider a clock where we count by 12s and 60s and use : to separate.
-
@futurebird "shapes"? "squiggles"?
@kw217 @futurebird This does at least make the idea more concrete and intuitive rather than introducing special language. I think people should ideally learn the terminology for a concept *after* grasping the concept itself. Then the fancy word ("symbol", "digit" etc.) is just a label for the thing they're already familiar with, and they can learn one thing at once.
-
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird Mathematical
A number in base n is a polynomial
xn^0 + yn^1 + zn^2 + …
where x,y,z, … are whole numbers < n
-
@futurebird Mathematical
A number in base n is a polynomial
xn^0 + yn^1 + zn^2 + …
where x,y,z, … are whole numbers < n
This is great for students who have strong algebra. But that idea of using increasing powers? It's really not obvious that's what's going on when you first start.
But could one do something with... physical cubes and literal flat squares? That's Cuisenaire rods for decimal.
Are there... base 16 Cuisenaire rods? Why not? hmm....
-
@futurebird Glyphs ... Then use things other than digits.
@ColinTheMathmo @futurebird I thought about this, then thought it was too hard. But maybe it's a good signal for "you have to pay attention while I explain what a glyph is"?
-
@futurebird Roman numerals are like that because it's a finger counting system being written down, essentially a record of hand positions. (So four is traditionally IIII, not the compact for monuments IV.)
If I understand the discussion at all, which I might well not, the history-of-writing folks think positional notation and zero are effectively the same concept; it's difficult to do the one without the other. And, oddly, given the Babylonians did have it, Classical Antiquity didn't.
@graydon
Note that at least one, so presumably more, classical but not "Classical" cultures did have a zero concept and arguably notation (positional notation with an absence of knot being 0): https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.216.4548.869I think there's a whole lot of deep ideas under "many ancient peoples understood metrics mostly by ratios, and not decimalized." Of course 1/3 is more intuitive than 0.3333... and so on.
One of the few ways imperial measurements are superior is better fractioning - much more intuitive and far fewer figures needed.
-
Thing is then when we get to hex they are upset that A and F are not "digits" but ... maybe.
@futurebird @dancingtreefrog i think at that point the upset about learning something new that violates a socially constructed rule is unavoidable and possibly even harmful to shield the kids from
...i remember the first time in english class when the teacher told us the author we were studying was gay... -
I will use any damn thing like a number, watch me go.
-
@futurebird Symbol. It means “stands for”. The trouble comes because are reusing 1 and 0 together to mean something different. Somehow you need to convey that the symbol “represents” a concept, it is itself not the concept. The symbol alone carries no meaning except that which we agree to assign it.
@meltedcheese @futurebird this is good
one thing that isn't taught nearly enough (and some religious or reactionary parents might even actively obstruct such learning) is the arbitrariness of the signifier's relationship to the signified and how you need to learn to be able to untangle that to get to higher levels of thinking about anything
...this is kinda starting to feel like that previous discussion https://brain.worm.pin... -
@meltedcheese @futurebird this is good
one thing that isn't taught nearly enough (and some religious or reactionary parents might even actively obstruct such learning) is the arbitrariness of the signifier's relationship to the signified and how you need to learn to be able to untangle that to get to higher levels of thinking about anything
...this is kinda starting to feel like that previous discussion https://brain.worm.pin...@apophis @futurebird Thanks. Understanding the concept of symbol reallly does unlock a lot of reasoning.
-
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird In German we have a useful word: Ziffer (single digit number) - as opposed to Zahl (any number)
-
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird maybe you could start by introducing the concept of character sets (ASCII probably being the most “obvious” one to start with) so that the students get familiar /comfortable with the idea that even “simple” things like numbers & letters are encoded in computer-land, which could then flow into a discussion of both bases & variables 🤔
^ I’d suggest also the Unicode emoticons / emoji block for the fun factor but then you’re into multi-byte encodings & modifiers which seems you’d probably be throwing students into the deep end waaay too soon -
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird I go with "symbols" in Yr10 when I teach it. Certainly avoid "number", because one of the big ideas is to separate the notion of "number" from its representation.
Fun if I have Arabic or Korean or Chinese students. I ask them to write up their digits. -
@futurebird @dancingtreefrog i think at that point the upset about learning something new that violates a socially constructed rule is unavoidable and possibly even harmful to shield the kids from
...i remember the first time in english class when the teacher told us the author we were studying was gay...@apophis @futurebird Hmm, never bothered me, but I went to high school in the late 1960s and studied English in university through the 1970s. I guess I'm just weird.
-
Bases. (decimal, binary etc) are best explained through examples.
"You can only write three symbols in base 3. These are: 0, 1, 2"
So you count: 0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12 ...
I think the word "symbols" is confusing, but so is "characters"? Students don't think of numbers or letters as "symbols" or characters. The card sorting puzzle helps with this. But I'm always refining the language:
How would you put this as plainly as possible?
@futurebird maybe don't use letters or numbers, use emojis for example
Base 2: 😀😭
Base 3: 😀😅😭 -
They don't have place value. And they use... subtraction. But our students are very familiar with roman numerals for some reason (I think the PE staff uses them a lot?)
I want to bring them out when it can be more obvious how strange they are.
Change the symbols and I don't even know if you could do a sorting problem with them.
@futurebird @merms @graydon I once saw a demonstration (by some maths guy on TV) of doing long division with Roman numerals. It was indeed strange.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
-
Thing is then when we get to hex they are upset that A and F are not "digits" but ... maybe.
@futurebird @dancingtreefrog I vote for digits too. And you can make an example of weird digits even before getting to base 16 if you want to try your luck at teach them about balanced ternary after showing them the classic unbalanced version (use the the upper-side down 1 for the -1 value in writing, or T if typing: «why T?» «Because the Setun never gained commercial success»).
-
@futurebird @dancingtreefrog I vote for digits too. And you can make an example of weird digits even before getting to base 16 if you want to try your luck at teach them about balanced ternary after showing them the classic unbalanced version (use the the upper-side down 1 for the -1 value in writing, or T if typing: «why T?» «Because the Setun never gained commercial success»).
@futurebird @dancingtreefrog BTW I've done this with my kids and their cousins, age 10-16. I have a writeup in Italian about it, called «Twenty twenties» (twenty different ways of writing twenty):
https://wok.oblomov.eu/mathesis/venti-venti/
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
@IzzyOnDroid @forgejo Issue filters were already implemented for a very long time. It's merely you can now specify them via the search bar as well.
-
@forgejo Issue filters! 🥳 How cool is that! Was missing it for sooo looong… Thank you so much!!!
-
@mausmalone@mastodon.social time to move back to Sublime Text and mIRC 😂
-
@forgejo Wow, great to see improvements around working without JS.
https://forgejo.org/2026-01-release-v14-0/#interact-with-ui-without-javascript
-
@stefano The best part of getting up super early, is that you can crack open your first beer by 10am 😂
-
@Gargron Now take that information and couple it with the fact that a lot of business apps are now Electron-based. The only thing worse than running out of memory because of Chromium is running out of memory because you have 3 wholly separate instances of Chromium running with no shared resources.
-
#Forgejo 14.0.0 was just released!
Issues search now has inline filters. Web file editor was replaced with CodeMirror. CSRF protection is now stateless. Forgejo actions gained new features and better trust management. Foreign keys are now supported to ensure database consistency.
Check out the blog post at https://forgejo.org/2026-01-release-v14-0/
