Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

I threw this up on Metafilter too, but why not here?

Uncategorized
139 78 159

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • I think some people were using PMs for potentially sensitive info (addresses, Venmo, etc.), and having them slightly more secure puts people at ease.

    What about standard public-key stuff, dropping a short public key in a metadata field, keeping the private key on the endpoint or in the client?
    read more

  • @scottjenson not at all critical.

    Hint: you could re-run this as a poll, for the question.

    read more

  • @evan the already improved UX looks good, to me.

    When drafting a reply to a public toot, the word 'Public' is prominent (first screenshot).

    When drafting a mention, the separation is clear (second shot).

    Without being blasé about privacy: if a person accidentally publishes in either of those contexts, it's human error.

    read more

  • @scottjenson

    And.. you probably know, but just in case:

    We have a solid spec for E2EE on the Fediverse now (https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-e2ee/mls) with and launching later this year.

    As you'd expect with end-to-end-encryption, *most* of the work is on the browser/client. The AP server changes are minimal: a new KeyPackage object to store, a new collection, & other small stuff.

    When we have working JS code, it'll be AGPL, and you could use it as a baseline for Mastodon 😎

    read more

  • @scottjenson I rarely use them due to the UX fears, encryption would be a cherry on top

    read more

  • @scottjenson And on encryption, I think you could probably launch with UX improvements only, and leave encryption as a "fast follow". E2EE might not be *critical* but it's a *super-nice-to-have* ~ especially on today's internet.

    The fact that we call them "direct messages" isn't enough; people have a natural expectation of privacy when they send DMs, and the Fediverse doesn't really honor that right now.

    The more systems we can make "secure by default" the better.

    read more

  • @scottjenson Hey Scott! I'm so glad you're tackling this issue. I have lots of trouble with DMs on Mastodon. I think you're addressing, these, but here goes:

    The biggest one is how easily they're confused with regular messages. I routinely mess this up, and make private messages public, or vice versa.

    The next is how hard it is to visualize threads - especially in the existing notification section. I often lose my place in complex discussions

    read more

  • @scottjenson I think making UX improvements to DMs is a great idea.

    One of the biggest privacy problems with Mastodon DMs now is that people accidentally make them public.

    Separating the private mention UI from the public posting UI will probably avoid a huge percentage of those user errors.

    It'd be a big win for privacy.

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    Poking at the ESP32-P4 and -C6 Dies in an ESP32-P4-M3 ModuleThe RF section of the ESP32-C6 die. (Credit: electronupdate, YouTube)With the ESP32-P4 not having any wireless functionality and instead focusing on being a small SoC, it makes sense to combine it with a second chip that handles features like WiFi and Bluetooth. This makes the Guition ESP32-P4-M3 module both a pretty good example of how the P4 will be used, and an excellent opportunity to tear into, decap and shoot photos of the dies of both the P4 and the ESP32-C6 in this particular module, courtesy of [electronupdate]. There also the blog post for those who just want to ogle the shinies.After popping the metal shield on the module, you can see the contents as in the above photo. The P4 inside is a variant with 32 MB of PSRAM integrated along with the SoC die. This results in a die shot both of this PSRAM and the P4 die, though enough of the top metal seems to remain to clearly see the latter.The Boya brand Flash chip is quite standard inside, and along with a glance at the inside of one of the crystal oscillators we get to glance at the inside of the C6 MCU. This is a much more simple chip than the P4, with the RF section quite obvious. The total die sizes are 2.7 x 2.7 mm for the C6 and 4.29 x 3.66 mm for the P4.youtube.com/embed/-Nu0tjDCbbM?…hackaday.com/2026/02/19/poking…
  • yaoi!

    Uncategorized
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    yaoi! at the disco
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2 Views
    @cwebber Woah, suddenly Poland feels like a land of open-mindness and freedom. Even the previous conservative govt didn't change much.Come seek refuge in Poland, huh...
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    0 Views
    @stefano Maybe it would be needed some additions."Excluding languages stating memory-safety. They shall not allow writing mutually memory unsafe operations like volatiles, memory mapped I/Os. Let those to be written in other languages and sanely link with it with warnings."