I'm a bit naive, but I thought implementing snapping of parts orientation should be simple.
Uncategorized
5
Posts
2
Posters
2
Views
-
I'm a bit naive, but I thought implementing snapping of parts orientation should be simple.
It's already implemented for 90° snapping. What could go wrong in just changing this to increments of 15°? That'll nicely divide 90° by 6, 3 and 2.
Oh, and I want that no matter the order in which I combine rotations by increment of 15° I just get back to the same final orientations (including of course the main 90° orientations).
I wonder how rotation snapping is implemented in 3D modeling apps?
-
I'm a bit naive, but I thought implementing snapping of parts orientation should be simple.
It's already implemented for 90° snapping. What could go wrong in just changing this to increments of 15°? That'll nicely divide 90° by 6, 3 and 2.
Oh, and I want that no matter the order in which I combine rotations by increment of 15° I just get back to the same final orientations (including of course the main 90° orientations).
I wonder how rotation snapping is implemented in 3D modeling apps?
-
I'm a bit naive, but I thought implementing snapping of parts orientation should be simple.
It's already implemented for 90° snapping. What could go wrong in just changing this to increments of 15°? That'll nicely divide 90° by 6, 3 and 2.
Oh, and I want that no matter the order in which I combine rotations by increment of 15° I just get back to the same final orientations (including of course the main 90° orientations).
I wonder how rotation snapping is implemented in 3D modeling apps?
Taking a look at Blender, there is no rotation manipulator, the rotation axis is defined by the current view. So you can snap that rotation by increments of 15° if you want, but then if you make rotations around different axis, you won't come back to the original orientation. This is not at all what I want in the game.
-
Taking a look at Blender, there is no rotation manipulator, the rotation axis is defined by the current view. So you can snap that rotation by increments of 15° if you want, but then if you make rotations around different axis, you won't come back to the original orientation. This is not at all what I want in the game.
Taking a look at the Godot editor, it's interesting because it shows exactly my problem. If I make 4 rotations by 15° using the manipulator, I end up with an object in a quite arbitrary and non-aligned orientation.
This is not what I want in the game either.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
-
Taking a look at the Godot editor, it's interesting because it shows exactly my problem. If I make 4 rotations by 15° using the manipulator, I end up with an object in a quite arbitrary and non-aligned orientation.
This is not what I want in the game either.
@youen one non-obvious thing that might work: precompute a set of quaternions that you want to allow (eg. By a set of quantized euler angles). Then, you snap to the closest of those quaternions (cos theta distance might suffice). That swaps the problem around: you always have a strong guarantee of a small discrete set of possible poses, but now the difficult part is choosing a good set of poses.
PS: I think order independence will never work out. It's not even true for 90° I think.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@etc @eniko thanks! That's definitely one. There was I think another still from her that involved attaching the vibrator to one of those tools that go into the lock, but that was definitely the first I saw.
-
@luca 👍🏻😄
-
-
@G3rt e chi mette in dubbio che il colonialismo abbia portato morte e distruzione? Anche le conquiste di Roma non sono state una passeggiata di salute, così come quelle dei khan o dei califfi. Io però non vivo al tempo della regina Vittoria e non parlo latino. Ciò che vedo oggi in Europa sono poche decine di staterelli litigiosi, economicamente, demograficamente e militarmente insignificanti, incapaci di imporre anche solo politicamente una qualsivoglia visione.
-
Mass extinctions events
-
@jwz Given the ridiculously stupid things happening in the world now, I had this sinking feeling that it would be for real. But after reading FloofyWolf's full post, I'm fairly certain it is satirical.
(See https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2026/03/msg00018.html )
For me #Linux is the last bastion of computing freedom, now that MS and Apple appear to have become largely just #enshittified marketing/surveillance/fee-charging engines. I can certainly imagine a future where Linux (of all flavors) is under all-out assault from the tech-bros.
-
@stefano_zan 😍😍😍😍😍😍😍
-
@jwz the fuck?
I've read the first few posts in the original Ubuntu thread.
Am I mad? Or are they?
In the first few everyone just ponders how to actually do the censoring.
None asked the obvious question: ARE YOU BARKING MAD?
