So, I hope it goes without saying for almost everyone, but don't do shit like this.
Uncategorized
21
Posts
8
Posters
0
Views
-
@filippo @untitaker @poleguy @dave_andersen to express myself clearer: I don't think "going through the issues of a project not maintained for 4 years to say they've been fixed in a fork elsewhere" in and of itself represents spam; it is relevant communication of clear potential value to its recipients, who opted into hearing it at one point or another. (one could debate whether a PR should have been opened first, but that's getting into "splitting hairs" territory.)
I do however consider LLM contributions themselves spam unless demonstrated otherwise against a high, clear bar
@whitequark @filippo @untitaker @dave_andersen
However the right thing to do here would be for the author to share the prompt that they gave to the AI. It was probably only three sentences.
Possibly this rule would solve a lot of our AI trouble: all AI submissions must include all prompts. (That's the 'source code' after-all.)
-
undefined cybersecurity@poliverso.org shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
@Yaku speravo di aver sentito male
-
Cristo santo Laura che cazzo stai dicendo? Baciarsi le mani, mostrare rispetto.
Come i mafiosi?
#Sanremo26
-
@ALFA e controfiocchi 😍
-
Kabir Bedi ha 80 anni.
Avercene.
#sanremo
-
@emama Tutto scorre.
-
Kabir Bedi, un ottantenne coi fiocchi...
-
Eccolo il mio Sandokan
Posso andare a nanna
#sanremo2026 #Sanremo #kabirbedi
