Is ActivityPub a blatant violation of GDPR?
General Discussion
1
Posts
1
Posters
0
Views
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Good morning
This account is still alive. This morning I was thinking about my privacy. Many say that fediverse is more private. But they do not say that when post are send to servers, we do not know how each servers react.
For example this message publish 2025-12-09 will stay on different servers untilll .... I don't know. I will remove it from my server but some server keeps it 'for ever'. In 2028 maybe someone will see that message. But this account will not exists anymore.
Now I delete only message from my server. In the future I will delete my own post remotely. I don't know yet how but I will learn.
#fediverse #activitypub #question #thinking
-
liaizon@social.wake.st I pinged him, he says he can't respond yet because of the aforementioned connection negotiation issue! 🙂
-
@jdt this seems like it could use a @snarfed.org tag :)
-
Does the #Bluesky bridge thing use some kind of odd content-type when requesting profile data? I'm seeing these errors in my logs when my server tries to retrieve posts (as part of my reply retrieval functions):
[2025-12-09T00:59:33Z ERROR enigmatick::retriever] Failed to fetch object from remote. URL: https://bsky.brid.gy/convert/ap/at://did:plc:oofa3qqoiszsmajbigfqskqv/app.bsky.feed.post/3m7egmddbwk2h, Status: 502 Bad Gateway, Body: <!doctype html> <html lang=en> <title>502 Bad Gateway</title> <h1>Bad Gateway</h1> <p>Couldn't fetch https://enigmatick.social/user/jdt as ActivityStreams 2: Couldn't decode as JSON</p>If I'm reading that right, my retriever is failing because the bridge is trying to retrieve my profile and can't convert it to JSON. But I verified that my profile is provided as JSON for requests with these Accept header types:
application/json application/activity+json application/ld+json application/ld+json; profile="https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams...so I can't figure out what it's complaining about. I'll need to watch my varnish logs to see if I can capture one of the requests live from that perspective.
#ActivityPub
-
Is ActivityPub a blatant violation of GDPR?
-
They might want to publish something that's clearer then, because it certainly sounded like they wanted to abandon ActivityPub. "MisskeyHQ (misskey.io) != Misskey" isn't particularly helpful.. lots of brand name confusion there.
-
Posting for historical purposes:
#Misskey is NOT getting rid of #ActivityPub support
-
@mayel @evana @scottjenson @mastodonmigration @stefan It would only make it a little more difficult. The 'brigading' is now a two-step process for every participant.
The vector is really the 'followers-only' option. If we want to keep it, no way around sending a mandatory copy to a designated 'brigading moderator'.
