Maybe you don't care about the EU's digital sovereignty.
Uncategorized
2
Posts
2
Posters
2
Views
-
Maybe you don't care about the EU's digital sovereignty. But let's be serious for a moment - the chance of getting rid of MS Teams does sound exciting, right?
-
undefined aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place shared this topic
-
Maybe you don't care about the EU's digital sovereignty. But let's be serious for a moment - the chance of getting rid of MS Teams does sound exciting, right?
@kwramm only until it gets replaced with something even worse.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
This un-workshop will be hosted by Johannes Ernst and Mike Masnick.
More info and registration: https://fediforum.org/2026-03-growing-open-social-web/
3/3
-
It happened and is still happening, but given the state of the world, weaponized misinformation etc etc, is it happening fast enough?
So this half-day event will be exclusively focused on how to grow the Open Social Web to bring its benefits to more people.
If you have opinions how to do that, or are working on it, or would like to help, join us, online! Together, we are smarter than any one of us, so let's stick our heads together.
2/3
-
On March 2, we are going to try something different. Something in addition to the regular twice/year FediForum un-conference (so don't worry).
We will run an un-**workshop**, on a topic that many in the community have told us is very pressing for them:
How do we grow the Open Social Web?
When Elon bought Twitter now over three years ago, and every time X has been rocked by scandal since, many people expected a big exodus to decentralized social media platforms based on open protocols.
1/3
-
@shoofle maybe for a rather shallow definition of "imagination"
-
your soul is your moral core, the standards by which you hold and the relationship you have with them, the relationships and history you have with people, the lasting effects of memory, your traumas and reactions
-
@Alberto 😘
-
anyway my cosmology holds that souls are not a "real, physical object", but do/should be thought to exist as our term to handwave away "it seems like people act as moral, empathetic actors even when it's against their 'rational' best interest" like. there's clearly something there even if we don't know how to describe it, right? i call it a "soul"
-
this is all to say, i don't think you have to believe in All That Woo to believe in souls (patterns and qualities in humans that are not physically obvious or measurable but nevertheless exist and can be observed through social and moral interaction) and also to believe that chatbots do not have them and like. idk.
i think that chatbots have as much claim to "imagination" as humans do. but that doesn't mean they are good at stuff!
