The European Commission lost the Chat Control 2.0 battle over access to end-to-end encrypted data.
Uncategorized
3
Posts
3
Posters
0
Views
-
The European Commission lost the Chat Control 2.0 battle over access to end-to-end encrypted data. By the summer 2026, they will be back with their next attempt: Going Dark. This time some EU member states want to include VPN services.
The Going Dark initiative, or ProtectEU as the Commission now calls it, wants to “enable law enforcement authorities to access encrypted data in a lawful manner”. This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt.
-
The European Commission lost the Chat Control 2.0 battle over access to end-to-end encrypted data. By the summer 2026, they will be back with their next attempt: Going Dark. This time some EU member states want to include VPN services.
The Going Dark initiative, or ProtectEU as the Commission now calls it, wants to “enable law enforcement authorities to access encrypted data in a lawful manner”. This is a Chat Control 3.0 attempt.
@mullvadnet Really does seem like literally no one who isn't part of the EU Commission actually wants this...
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
undefined riffraff@mastodon.social shared this topic
-
@mullvadnet Really does seem like literally no one who isn't part of the EU Commission actually wants this...
@disorderlyf @mullvadnet it was the danish government pushing this last time, not the EC motu proprio
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@Gina it's pretty good, eh? Albeit 29°C and humid at 2am wasn't much fun last night, minimum 26 at 6am. But most days, it's pretty bloody good.
-
Addestramento subliminale
@aitech - Le IA tendono a fare associazioni puramente statistiche, che possono portare a illusioni
-
@atoponce i think that would be awesome!
-
@MattHatton lol you're joking, Northern Sydney is beautiful.
-
@MattHatton what's the right side of Sydney?
-
@cowlet @scruss and yes this does lead to fuzzy areas such as amateurs playing with professional rules or in tournaments of different officiality, or at least to some varying degree of playfulness: the more personally one plays, the less of a game it is.
2/2
-
@cowlet @scruss I'm perfectly fine with professional anything not falling into the “game” category. By name already, it is being done as a profession, not to entertain the player, even if the player does enjoy the activity, and yes, even if the rules of the subject are exactly the same (which in cases are not, as you need additional implements e.g. to track time, or judges to validate moves, etc).
1/
